Dataset Information

Combination treatment of arsenic trioxide and osimertinib in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents an advanced stage of the disease and frequently shows resistance to these current treatments, including platinum chemotherapy, cetuximab plus chemotherapy, and checkpoint inhibitors. EGFR overexpression and TP53 mutation are the most frequent genetic changes in patients with HNSCC. On the basis of this genetic feature, we proposed a combinatorial treatment using the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib (AZD) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) for compassionate use. The patient obtained treatment response and progression-free survival for about six months. In vitro mechanical verifications showed that ATO and AZD combination (ATO/AZD) significantly increased intracellular ROS levels and DNA damage. Additionally, ATO/AZD decreases the expression and activity of breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) and polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), thereby impairing Rad51 recruitment to DNA double-strand lesion for repair and may ultimately cause tumor cell death. In conclusion, this study provides a concrete experience and an alternate strategy of ATO/AZD therapy for patients with R/M HNSCC.

SUBMITTER: Hsieh CY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9729903 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Combination treatment of arsenic trioxide and osimertinib in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Hsieh Ching-Yun CY Chang Wei-Chao WC Lin Ching-Chan CC Chen Jong-Hang JH Lin Chen-Yuan CY Liu Chia-Hua CH Lin Chen C Hung Mien-Chie MC

American journal of cancer research 20221115 11

Recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents an advanced stage of the disease and frequently shows resistance to these current treatments, including platinum chemotherapy, cetuximab plus chemotherapy, and checkpoint inhibitors. EGFR overexpression and <i>TP53</i> mutation are the most frequent genetic changes in patients with HNSCC. On the basis of this genetic feature, we proposed a combinatorial treatment using the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor os ...[more]

PMID: 36504903

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRecurrence and/or metastasis occurs in more than half of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and these events pose the greatest threats to long-term survival. We set out to identify genetic alterations that underlie recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.MethodsWhole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on genomic DNA extracted from fresh-frozen whole blood and patient-matched tumor pairs from 13 HNSCC patients with synchronous lymph node metastases and 10 patients with metachronous recurrent tumors. Mutational concordance within and between tumor pairs was used to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of HNSCC in individual patients and to identify potential therapeutic targets for functional evaluation.ResultsApproximately 86% and 60% of single somatic nucleotide variants (SSNVs) identified in synchronous nodal metastases and metachronous recurrent tumors, respectively, were transmitted from the primary index tumor. Genes that were mutated in more than one metastatic or recurrent tumor, but not in the respective primary tumors, include C17orf104, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, type 3 (ITPR3), and discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (DDR2). Select DDR2 mutations have been shown to confer enhanced sensitivity to SRC-family kinase (SFK) inhibitors in other malignancies. Similarly, HNSCC cell lines harboring endogenous and engineered DDR2 mutations were more sensitive to the SFK inhibitor dasatinib than those with WT DDR2.ConclusionIn this WES study of patient-matched tumor pairs in HNSCC, we found synchronous lymph node metastases to be genetically more similar to their paired index primary tumors than metachronous recurrent tumors. This study outlines a compendium of somatic mutations in primary, metastatic, and/or recurrent HNSCC cancers, with potential implications for precision medicine approaches.FundingNational Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore, and Gilead Sciences Inc.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination immunochemotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).DesignMeta-analysis and systematic review.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library and the Clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry were searched up to 14 March 2022.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe included randomised controlled trials that compared combination immunochemotherapy with conventional chemotherapy for R/M HNSCC. Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects (AEs).Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The HR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for survival analysis, while the OR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for dichotomous variables. These statistics were extracted by the reviewers and aggregated using a fixed-effects model to synthesise the data.ResultsA total of 1214 relevant papers were obtained after the initial search, and five papers that met the inclusion criteria were included; these studies included a total of 1856 patients with R/M HNSCC. Meta-analysis showed that the OS and PFS of patients with R/M HNSCC in the combination immunochemotherapy group were significantly longer than those in the conventional chemotherapy group (HR=0.84; 95% CI 0.76, 0.94; p=0.002; HR=0.67; 95% CI 0.61, 0.75; p<0.0001), and the ORR was significantly higher (OR=1.90; 95% CI 1.54, 2.34; p<0.00001). The analysis of AEs showed that there was no significant difference in the overall incidence rate of AEs between two groups (OR=0.80; 95% CI 0.18, 3.58; p=0.77), but the rate of grade III and IV AEs was significantly higher in patients in the combination immunochemotherapy group (OR=1.39; 95% CI 1.12, 1.73; p=0.003).ConclusionsCombination immunochemotherapy prolonged OS and PFS in patients with R/M HNSCC and improved the ORR; while this approach did not increase the overall incidence of AEs in patients, it increased the rate of grade III and IV AEs.Prospero registration numberCRD42022344166.

Project description:BackgroundTreatment options for patients with platinum-refractory, recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/m HNSCC) are limited and prognosis is poor. The recent CheckMate 141 clinical trial demonstrated that nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody, was efficacious in extending the median overall survival (OS) in this patient population compared with standard therapies. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether nivolumab is a cost-effective treatment in this patient population and examined various subgroups to determine for which, if any, the treatment is more cost-effective.Materials and methodsWe implemented a state transition model for HNSCC with a patient cohort who had tumor progression 6 months after the last dose of platinum-containing chemotherapy and compared the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab with docetaxel. Treatment effect estimates and adverse event rates were obtained from CheckMate 141. Costs, utilities, and other model inputs were gathered from published sources. We used a Canadian perspective, a 5-year time horizon, and a 1.5% discount rate for the analysis.ResultsNivolumab extended mean OS by 4 months compared with docetaxel and resulted in fewer treatment-related adverse events, producing an incremental effectiveness of 0.13 quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The incremental cost of treatment with nivolumab was $18,823. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, nivolumab was not a cost-effective treatment option for r/m HNSCC, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $144,744/QALY. Nivolumab would be cost-effective if its price was reduced by 20%. Our subgroup analysis seemed to indicate that nivolumab might be cost-effective for tumors with expression of programmed death-ligand 1 >5%.ConclusionWe conclude that although nivolumab offers clinical benefit for the treatment of r/m HNSCC over current regimens, it is not cost-effective based on its list price. We have also established a value-based price estimate for nivolumab to be cost-effective in this patient population. Further study is required to draw a definitive conclusion on biomarkers for cost-effectiveness.Implications for practiceIn health care settings in which cost considerations are a constraint on choice of therapy, patient selection should be carefully considered to maintain efficiency in the system. Until a biomarker for response to therapy is identified for nivolumab, this medication is unlikely to be cost-effective for most patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Dataset Information

Combination treatment of arsenic trioxide and osimertinib in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Publications

Combination treatment of arsenic trioxide and osimertinib in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets