Dataset Information

Effect of Dioptric Blur on Pattern-Reversal and Motion-Onset VEPs as Used in Clinical Research.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To describe the effect of dioptric blur on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) induced by motion onset (MO-VEPs).

Methods

The effect of dioptric blur up to 4 D on MO-VEPs was tested on 12 subjects using central, peripheral, and full-field stimulation with a low-contrast structure of concentric circles with spatial frequency <1 c/°. The results were compared to VEPs evoked by 15' and 60' checkerboard pattern-reversal (PR-VEPs). The relationship between peak time and interpeak amplitude of the dominant components was related to the level of dioptric blur using linear regression.

Results

The MO-VEPs did not show a significant peak prolongation (P > 0.28) or amplitude attenuation (P > 0.14) with the blur, whereas for the PR-VEPs we observed a significant decrease in amplitude (P < 0.001) and increase in peak time (P < 0.001) for both checkerboard sizes.

Conclusions

For MO-VEPs induced by radial motion of low contrast and low spatial frequency pattern, the change in retinal blur does not affect the peak time or the interpeak amplitude of the dominant N2 component.

Translational relevance

The resistance to retinal blur that we demonstrated for MO-VEP provides a diagnostic opportunity to test the integrity of the visual system and reveal a retrobulbar impairment even in uncorrected refractive errors.

SUBMITTER: Kordek D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9733653 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of Dioptric Blur on Pattern-Reversal and Motion-Onset VEPs as Used in Clinical Research.

Kordek David D Voda Petr P Young Laura K LK Kremlacek Jan J

Translational vision science & technology 20221201 12

<h4>Purpose</h4>To describe the effect of dioptric blur on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) induced by motion onset (MO-VEPs).<h4>Methods</h4>The effect of dioptric blur up to 4 D on MO-VEPs was tested on 12 subjects using central, peripheral, and full-field stimulation with a low-contrast structure of concentric circles with spatial frequency <1 c/°. The results were compared to VEPs evoked by 15' and 60' checkerboard pattern-reversal (PR-VEPs). The relationship between peak time and interpeak a ...[more]

PMID: 36472879

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAnatomical and physiological differences between the central and peripheral visual systems are well documented. Recent findings have suggested that vision in the periphery is not just a scaled version of foveal vision, but rather is relatively poor at representing spatial and temporal phase and other visual features. Shapiro, Lu, Huang, Knight, and Ennis (2010) have recently examined a motion stimulus (the "curveball illusion") in which the shift from foveal to peripheral viewing results in a dramatic spatial/temporal discontinuity. Here, we apply a similar analysis to a range of other spatial/temporal configurations that create perceptual conflict between foveal and peripheral vision.Methodology/principal findingsTo elucidate how the differences between foveal and peripheral vision affect super-threshold vision, we created a series of complex visual displays that contain opposing sources of motion information. The displays (referred to as the peripheral escalator illusion, peripheral acceleration and deceleration illusions, rotating reversals illusion, and disappearing squares illusion) create dramatically different perceptions when viewed foveally versus peripherally. We compute the first-order and second-order directional motion energy available in the displays using a three-dimensional Fourier analysis in the (x, y, t) space. The peripheral escalator, acceleration and deceleration illusions and rotating reversals illusion all show a similar trend: in the fovea, the first-order motion energy and second-order motion energy can be perceptually separated from each other; in the periphery, the perception seems to correspond to a combination of the multiple sources of motion information. The disappearing squares illusion shows that the ability to assemble the features of Kanisza squares becomes slower in the periphery.Conclusions/significanceThe results lead us to hypothesize "feature blur" in the periphery (i.e., the peripheral visual system combines features that the foveal visual system can separate). Feature blur is of general importance because humans are frequently bringing the information in the periphery to the fovea and vice versa.

Dataset Information

Effect of Dioptric Blur on Pattern-Reversal and Motion-Onset VEPs as Used in Clinical Research.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Translational relevance

Publications

Effect of Dioptric Blur on Pattern-Reversal and Motion-Onset VEPs as Used in Clinical Research.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets