Dynamic chest radiography in the workup of lung cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: FitzMaurice TS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9745521 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Dynamic chest radiography in the workup of lung cancer.
FitzMaurice Thomas S TS Nazareth Dilip S DS Walshaw Martin J MJ
Journal of thoracic disease 20221101 11
Similar Datasets
Project description:Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a real-time sequential high-resolution digital X-ray imaging system of the thorax in motion over the respiratory cycle, utilising pulsed image exposure and a larger field of view than fluoroscopy coupled with a low radiation dose, where post-acquisition image processing by computer algorithm automatically characterises the motion of thoracic structures. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and found 29 relevant publications describing its use in humans including the assessment of diaphragm and chest wall motion, measurement of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion, and the assessment of airway narrowing. Work is ongoing in several other areas including assessment of diaphragmatic paralysis. We assess the findings, methodology and limitations of DCR, and we discuss the current and future roles of this promising medical imaging technology.Critical relevance statement Dynamic chest radiography provides a wealth of clinical information, but further research is required to identify its clinical niche.
| S-EPMC10277270 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel and supplementary examination in respiratory diseases. The investigation of other chest diseases using DCR has been explored, identifying a certain correlation of the pulmonary function test (PFT). However, there is a lack of research using DCR parameters to quantitatively evaluate chest disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of DCR for diaphragm paralysis (DP).MethodsThis retrospective study recruited 118 participants, which include 18 patients with DP, 48 healthy volunteers, and 52 patients with respiratory disease. Comparison of DCR parameters relationships among 3 groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the value of the DCR parameters to diagnose DP.ResultsThe differences of excursion of diaphragm (ED) in normal (nb) and forced breathing (fb), ED(fb)-ED(nb), and the parameters of projected lung area (PLA) in inspiratory (ins) and expiratory phase (exp), PLA.exp(fb), PLA.ins(fb)-PLA.ins(nb), and PLA.exp(fb)-PLA.exp(nb) among the 3 groups were statistically significant. The highest area under the curve (AUC) of right-side parameter was the ED(fb)-ED(nb), for which the AUC was 0.8950 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7618-1.000], whereas that of the left-side parameter was ED(fb), for which the AUC was 0.9176 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8524-0.9829].ConclusionsThe parameters of DCR have good diagnostic value for DP. The highest diagnostic efficiency for DP on the right side is the ED(fb)-ED(nb), with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 78.6%, whereas on the left side is ED(fb), with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88.2%.
| S-EPMC11320492 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Dynamic digital radiography (DDR) is a high-resolution radiographic imaging technique using pulsed X-ray emission to acquire a multiframe cine-loop of the target anatomical area. The first DDR technology was orthostatic chest acquisitions, but new portable equipment that can be positioned at the patient's bedside was recently released, significantly expanding its potential applications, particularly in chest examination. It provides anatomical and functional information on the motion of different anatomical structures, such as the lungs, pleura, rib cage, and trachea. Native images can be further analyzed with dedicated post-processing software to extract quantitative parameters, including diaphragm motility, automatically projected lung area and area changing rate, a colorimetric map of the signal value change related to respiration and motility, and lung perfusion. The dynamic diagnostic information along with the significant advantages of this technique in terms of portability, versatility, and cost-effectiveness represents a potential game changer for radiological diagnosis and monitoring at the patient's bedside. DDR has several applications in daily clinical practice, and in this narrative review, we will focus on chest imaging, which is the main application explored to date in the literature. However, studies are still needed to understand deeply the clinical impact of this method.
| S-EPMC10885043 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10797365 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10797375 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10636484 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo plan a surgical approach and predict the operative time or bleeding volume, it is important to determine the presence of pleural adhesions before surgery. Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a new modality that can dynamically capture X-rays, and we assessed the utility of DCR for detecting pleural adhesions preoperatively.MethodsThe subjects of this study were those who underwent DCR before surgery from January 2020 to May 2022. The preoperative evaluation was performed by three imaging analysis modes, and pleural adhesion was defined as the that spreading to more than 20% of the thoracic cavity and/or taking more than 5 minutes to dissect.ResultsOf the 120 total patients, DCR was performed properly for 119 (99.2%). Accurate preoperative evaluations of pleural adhesions were confirmed in 101 patients (84.9%), with a sensitivity of 64.5%, specificity of 91.0%, positive predictive value of 74.1%, and negative predictive value of 88.0%.ConclusionsDCR was very easy to perform in all preoperative patients with all manner of thoracic disease. We demonstrated the utility of DCR, showing its high specificity and negative predictive value. DCR has the potential to become a common preoperative examination for detecting pleural adhesions with further improvements in software programs.
| S-EPMC10089839 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeAccurate preoperative assessment of tumor invasion/adhesion is crucial for planning appropriate operative procedures. Recent advances in digital radiography allow a motion analysis of lung tumors with dynamic chest radiography (DCR) with total exposure dose comparable to that of conventional chest radiography. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of preoperative evaluation of pleural invasion/adhesion of lung tumors with DCR through a virtual clinical imaging study, using a four-dimensional (4D) extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) computational phantom.MethodsAn XCAT phantom of an adult man (50th percentile in height and weight) with simulated respiratory and cardiac motions was generated to use as a virtual patient. To simulate lung tumors with and without pleural invasion, a 30-mm diameter tumor sphere was inserted into each lobe of the phantom. The virtual patient during respiration was virtually projected using an x-ray simulator in posteroanterior (PA) and oblique directions, and sequential bone suppression (BS) images were created. The measurement points (tumor, rib, and diaphragm) were automatically tracked on simulated images by a template matching technique. We calculated five quantitative metrics related to the movement distance and directions of the targeted tumor and evaluated whether DCR could distinguish between tumors with and without pleural invasion/adhesion.ResultsPrecise tracking of the targeted tumor was achieved on the simulated BS images without undue influence of rib shadows. There was a significant difference in all five quantitative metrics between the lung tumors with and without pleural invasion both on the oblique and PA projection views (P < 0.05). Quantitative metrics related to the movement distance were effective for tumors in the middle and lower lobes, while, those related to the movement directions were effective for tumors close to the frontal chest wall on the oblique projection view. The oblique views were useful for the evaluation of the space between the chest wall and a moving tumor.ConclusionDCR could help distinguish between tumors with and without pleural invasion/adhesion based on the two-dimensional movement distance and direction using oblique and PA projection views. With anticipated improved image: processing to evaluate the respiratory displacement of lung tumors in the upper lobe or behind the heart, DCR holds promise for clinical assessment of tumor invasion/adhesion in the parietal pleura.
| S-EPMC8587535 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAccurate prediction of postoperative pulmonary function is important for ensuring the safety of patients undergoing radical resection for lung cancer. Dynamic perfusion digital radiography is an excellent and easy imaging method for detecting blood flow in the lung compared with the less-convenient conventional lung perfusion scintigraphy. As such, the present study aimed to confirm whether dynamic perfusion digital radiography can be evaluated in comparison with pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting early postoperative pulmonary function and complications.MethodsDynamic perfusion digital radiography and spirometry were performed before and 1 and 3 months after radical resection for lung cancer. Correlation coefficients between blood flow ratios calculated using dynamic perfusion digital radiography and pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy were then confirmed in the same cases. In all patients who underwent dynamic perfusion digital radiography, the correlation predicted values calculated from the blood flow ratio, and measured values were examined. Furthermore, ppo%FEV1 or ppo%DLco values, which indicated the risk for perioperative complications, were examined.ResultsA total of 52 participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Blood flow ratios measured using pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and dynamic perfusion digital radiography showed excellent correlation and acceptable predictive accuracy. Correlation coefficients between predicted FEV1 values obtained from dynamic perfusion digital radiography or pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and actual measured values were similar. All patients who underwent dynamic perfusion digital radiography showed excellent correlation between predicted values and those measured using spirometry. A significant difference in ppo%DLco was observed for respiratory complications but not cardiovascular complications.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that dynamic perfusion digital radiography can be a suitable alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy given its ability for predicting postoperative values and the risk for postoperative respiratory complications. Furthermore, it seemed to be an excellent modality because of its advantages, such as simplicity, low cost, and ease in obtaining in-depth respiratory functional information.Trial registrationRegistered at UMIN on October 25, 2017. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000033957 Registration number: UMIN000029716.
| S-EPMC7874664 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Organ donation guidelines recommend a "clear" conventional bedside chest radiograph before lung transplantation despite only moderate accuracy for cardiopulmonary abnormalities. Purpose:To evaluate the influence of donor image interpretation on lung transplantation outcome in recipients by following early and late complications, one-year survival, and to correlate imaging findings and blood gas analysis with lung transplantation outcome in recipients. Material and Methods:In 35 lung donors from a single institution clinical reports and study reviews of imaging findings of the mandatory bedside chest radiographs and blood gas analyses were compared with clinical outcome in 38 recipients. Hospitalization time, peri- and postoperative complications, early complications (primary graft dysfunction, infection), 30-day and one-year survival, and forced expiratory volume in 1?s percentage of predicted normal value (FEV1%) at one-year follow-up were analyzed. Results:Findings in clinical reports and study reviews differed substantially, e.g. regarding reported decompensation, edema, infection, and atelectasis. No correlation was shown between imaging findings in clinical report or study review and blood gas analyses in the lung donors compared to postoperative outcome in recipients. Conclusion:The interpretation of the mandatory chest radiograph in its present form does not influence one-year outcome in lung transplantation. Larger imaging studies or a change in clinical routine including computed tomography may provide evidence for future guidelines.
| S-EPMC6024291 | biostudies-literature