Dataset Information

Telemedicine interventions in six conflict-affected countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has escalated the use of telemedicine in both high and low resource settings however its use has preceded this, particularly in conflict-affected settings. Several countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean (EMR) region are affected by complex, protracted crises. Though telemedicine has been used in such settings, there has been no comprehensive assessment of what interventions are used, their efficacy, barriers, or current research gaps.

Main body

A systematic search of ten academic databases and 3 grey literature sources from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2020 was completed, identifying telemedicine interventions in select EMR conflict-affected settings and relevant enablers and barriers to their implementation. Included articles reported on telemedicine use in six conflict-affected EMR countries (or territories) graded as WHO Health Emergencies: Afghanistan, Gaza, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen. Data were extracted and narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes. Of 3419 articles identified, twenty-one peer-reviewed and three grey literature sources met the inclusion criteria. We analysed these by context, intervention, and evaluation.

Context

eight related to Afghanistan, eight to Syria and seven to Iraq with one each in Yemen and Gaza. Most were implemented by humanitarian or academic organisations with projects mostly initiated in the United States or Europe and mostly by physicians. The in-country links were mostly health professionals rather than patients seeking specialist inputs for specialities not locally available.

Interventions

these included both SAF (store and forward) and RT (real-time) with a range of specialities represented including radiology, histopathology, dermatology, mental health, and intensive care.

Evaluation

most papers were observational or descriptive with few describing quality measures of interventions.

Conclusions

Telemedicine interventions are feasible in conflict-affected settings in EMR using low-cost, accessible technologies. However, few implemented interventions reported on evaluation strategies or had these built in. The ad hoc nature of some of the interventions, which relied on volunteers without sustained financial or academic investment, could pose challenges to quality and sustainability. There was little exploration of confidentiality, ethical standards, data storage or local healthcare worker and patient acceptability.

SUBMITTER: Parkes P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9748883 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Telemedicine interventions in six conflict-affected countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review.

Parkes Pylin P Pillay Timesh D TD Bdaiwi Yamama Y Simpson Remi R Almoshmosh Nadim N Murad Lina L Abbara Aula A

Conflict and health 20221214 1

<h4>Background</h4>The COVID-19 pandemic has escalated the use of telemedicine in both high and low resource settings however its use has preceded this, particularly in conflict-affected settings. Several countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean (EMR) region are affected by complex, protracted crises. Though telemedicine has been used in such settings, there has been no comprehensive assessment of what interventions are used, their efficacy, barriers, or current research gaps.<h4>Main body</h4 ...[more]

PMID: 36517869

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) faces major social, economic, and demographic challenges, with nearly half of its countries affected by conflicts that severely disrupt health systems. This study compared antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and surveillance efforts in conflict-affected, fragile, and non-conflict countries, further subdivided by income.MethodsData on bacteriologically confirmed bloodstream infections (BC-BSIs) from 2017 to 2021 were extracted from the WHO GLASS database. Countries were classified as conflict-affected, fragile, or non-conflict (subdivided by income) using World Bank criteria. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) were calculated, and group comparisons were performed using unpaired t-tests with Welch's correction. Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.ResultsConflict-affected countries reported significantly fewer surveillance sites than non-conflict countries (MD: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.361 to 0.836, P < 0.001) and fewer BC-BSIs per million population (MD: 31.00, 95% CI: 17.210 to 44.790, P < 0.001). In conflict zones, Acinetobacter spp. and S. aureus represented a higher proportion of BSIs compared to non-conflict countries (Acinetobacter spp. MD: -11.86, 95% CI: - 27.130 to 3.399, P = 0.099; S. aureus MD: - 10.68, 95% CI: - 30.030 to 8.680, P = 0.203). Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter spp. exceeded 65% across the groups, peaking in fragile zones (83.38%). Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli (3GCREC) prevalence ranged from 47.99% to 76.34%, peaking in conflict zones (76.34%). Carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREC) prevalence ranged from 2.31% to 15.95%, highest in non-conflict low-middle income countries (15.95%). Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae (3GCRKP) exceeded 50% in all groups, peaking in conflict zones (80.42%). The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) ranged from 14.49% to 45.70%, peaking in conflict zones and non-conflict low-middle income countries (45.70%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) exceeded 30%, peaking in conflict zones (70.09%).ConclusionsConflict-affected countries have weaker AMR surveillance and lower BC-BSI detection but a higher burden of resistant pathogens, notably carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and MRSA. Tailored strategies are essential to restore infrastructure, strengthen surveillance, and mitigate the long-term impact of AMR in these zones.

Project description:Systematic reviews can offer policymakers and stakeholders concise, transparent, and relevant evidence pertaining to pressing policy priorities to help inform the decision-making process. The production and the use of systematic reviews are specifically limited in the Eastern Mediterranean region. The extent to which published systematic reviews address policy priorities in the region is still unknown. This situational analysis exercise aims at assessing the extent to which published systematic reviews address policy priorities identified by policymakers and stakeholders in Eastern Mediterranean region countries. It also provides an overview about the state of systematic review production in the region and identifies knowledge gaps.We conducted a systematic search of the Health System Evidence database to identify published systematic reviews on policy-relevant priorities pertaining to the following themes: human resources for health, health financing, the role of the non-state sector, and access to medicine. Priorities were identified from two priority-setting exercises conducted in the region. We described the distribution of these systematic reviews across themes, sub-themes, authors' affiliations, and countries where included primary studies were conducted.Out of the 1,045 systematic reviews identified in Health System Evidence on selected themes, a total of 200 systematic reviews (19.1%) addressed the priorities from the Eastern Mediterranean region. The theme with the largest number of systematic reviews included was human resources for health (115) followed by health financing (33), access to medicine (27), and role of the non-state sector (25). Authors based in the region produced only three systematic reviews addressing regional priorities (1.5%). Furthermore, no systematic review focused on the Eastern Mediterranean region. Primary studies from the region had limited contribution to systematic reviews; 17 systematic reviews (8.5%) included primary studies conducted in the region.There are still gaps in the production of systematic reviews addressing policymakers' and stakeholders' priorities in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Efforts should be directed towards better aligning systematic review production with policy needs and priorities. Study findings can inform the agendas of researchers, research institutions, and international funding agencies of priority areas where systematic reviews are required.

Project description:BackgroundDuring rapidly evolving outbreaks, health services and essential medical care are interrupted as facilities have become overwhelmed responding to COVID-19. In the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), more than half of countries are affected by emergencies, hospitals face complex challenges as they respond to humanitarian crises, maintain essential services, and fight the pandemic. While hospitals in the EMR have adapted to combat COVID-19, evidence-based and context-specific recommendations are needed to guide policymakers and hospital managers on best practices to strengthen hospitals' readiness, limit the impact of the pandemic, and create lasting hospital sector improvements towards recovery and resilience.AimGuided by the WHO/EMR's "Hospital readiness checklist for COVID-19", this study presents the experiences of EMR hospitals in combatting COVID-19 across the 22 EMR countries, including their challenges and interventions across the checklist domains, to inform improvements to pandemic preparedness, response, policy, and practice.MethodsTo collect in-depth and comprehensive information on hospital experiences, qualitative and descriptive quantitative data was collected between May-October 2020. To increase breadth of responses, this comprehensive qualitative study triangulated findings from a regional literature review with the findings of an open-ended online survey (n = 139), and virtual in-depth key informant interviews with 46 policymakers and hospital managers from 18 out of 22 EMR countries. Purposeful sampling supported by snowballing was used and continued until reaching data saturation, measures were taken to increase the trustworthiness of the results. Led by the checklist domains, qualitative data was thematically analyzed using MAXQDA.FindingsHospitals faced continuously changing challenges and needed to adapt to maintain operations and provide essential services. This thematic analysis revealed major themes for the challenges and interventions utilized by hospitals for each of hospital readiness domains: Preparedness, Leadership, Operational support, logistics, supply management, Communications and Information, Human Resources, Continuity of Essential Services and Surge Capacity, Rapid Identification and Diagnosis, Isolation and Case Management, and Infection, Prevention and Control.ConclusionHospitals are the backbone of COVID-19 response, and their resilience is essential for achieving universal health coverage. Multi-pronged (across each of the hospitals readiness domains) and multi-level policies are required to strengthen hospitals resilience and prepare health systems for future outbreaks and shocks.

Dataset Information

Telemedicine interventions in six conflict-affected countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review.

Background

Main body

Context

Interventions

Evaluation

Conclusions

Publications

Telemedicine interventions in six conflict-affected countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets