Dataset Information

COVOX: Providing oxygen during the COVID-19 health emergency.

ABSTRACT: We introduce an autonomous oxygen concentrator that was designed in Peru to fight the oxygen shortage produced worldwide as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxygen concentrators represent a suitable and favorable option for administering this gas at the patient's bedside in developing countries, especially when cylinders and tubed systems are unavailable or when access to them is restricted by lack of accessories, inadequate power supply, or shortage of qualified personnel. Our system uses a pressure swing adsorption technique to provide oxygen to patients at a flow rate of up to 15 l/min ± 1,5 l/min and a concentration of 93 % ± 3 %, offering robustness, safety and functionality. The quality measurements obtained from the validation process demonstrate repeatability and accuracy. The complete design files are provided in the source file repository to facilitate oxygen concentrator production in low and middle income countries, where access to oxygen is still a major problem even after the pandemic. Oxygen is part of the World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines and is perhaps the only medicine that has no substitute. This device can provide a reliable supply of oxygen for critically ill patients and improve their chances of survival.

SUBMITTER: Rubio J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9763216 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

COVOX: Providing oxygen during the COVID-19 health emergency.

Rubio Joaquina J Rojas Christiam C Sanchez Midori M Gómez-Alzate Daniela D Córdova Mauricio M Montoya Verónica V Castaneda Benjamin B Chang Javier J Pérez-Buitrago Sandra S

HardwareX 20221220

We introduce an autonomous oxygen concentrator that was designed in Peru to fight the oxygen shortage produced worldwide as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxygen concentrators represent a suitable and favorable option for administering this gas at the patient's bedside in developing countries, especially when cylinders and tubed systems are unavailable or when access to them is restricted by lack of accessories, inadequate power supply, or shortage of qualified personnel. Our system use ...[more]

PMID: 36568708

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTelehealth services expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE).ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in availability of telehealth services at outpatient mental health treatment facilities (MHTFs) throughout the US during and after the COVID-19 PHE.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cohort study, callers posing as prospective clients contacted a random sample of 1404 MHTFs drawn from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Behavioral Health Treatment Locator from December 2022 to March 2023 (wave 1 [W1]; during PHE). From September to November 2023 (wave 2 [W2]; after PHE), callers recontacted W1 participants. Analyses were conducted in January 2024.Main outcomes and measuresCallers inquired whether MHTFs offered telehealth (yes vs no), and, if yes, whether they offered (1) audio-only telehealth (vs audio and video); (2) telehealth for therapy, medication management, and/or diagnostic services; and (3) telehealth for comorbid alcohol use disorder (AUD). Sustainers (offered telehealth in both waves), late adopters (did not offer telehealth in W1 but did in W2), nonadopters (did not offer telehealth in W1 or W2), and discontinuers (offered telehealth in W1 but not W2) were all compared.ResultsDuring W2, 1001 MHTFs (86.1%) were successfully recontacted. A total of 713 (71.2%) were located in a metropolitan county, 151 (15.1%) were publicly operated, and 935 (93.4%) accepted Medicaid as payment. The percentage offering telehealth declined from 799 (81.6%) to 765 (79.0%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00; P < .05). Among MHTFs offering telehealth, a smaller percentage in W2 offered audio-only telehealth (369 [49.3%] vs 244 [34.1%]; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.64; P < .001) and telehealth for comorbid AUD (559 [76.3%] vs 457 [66.5%]; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001) compared with W1. In W2, MHTFs were more likely to report telehealth was only available under certain conditions for therapy (141 facilities [18.0%] vs 276 [36.4%]; OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.10-3.26; P < .001) and medication management (216 facilities [28.0%] vs 304 [41.3%]; OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.48-2.21; P < .001). A total of 684 MHTFs (72.0%) constituted sustainers, 94 (9.9%) were discontinuers, 106 (11.2%) were nonadopters, and 66 (7.0%) were late adopters. Compared with sustainers, discontinuers were less likely to be private for-profit (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68) or private not-for-profit (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48) after adjustment for facility and area characteristics.Conclusions and relevanceBased on this longitudinal cohort study of 1001 MHTFs, telehealth availability has declined since the PHE end with respect to scope and modality of services, suggesting targeted policies may be necessary to sustain telehealth access.

Project description:BackgroundThe emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) forced many eye care providers to implement telehealth services while in-person visits were reserved for essential and/or emergency eye care.ObjectiveThis study documents how an optometry group successfully implemented telehealth to care for patients during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.DesignRetrospective, comparative case series.MethodsRecords were reviewed for patients seen in an academic optometry clinic from 23 March through 7 April 2020, the period of the Massachusetts stay-at-home advisory issued in response to COVID-19. Patients who completed telehealth visits were compared with those who received in-person care. Services delivered by telehealth included a check of symptoms, medication refills, health education, and assurance of future follow up. The study took into account the reason for each visit, as well as the rate of scheduled and completed follow-up appointments. Patient satisfaction with in-person care was evaluated by Press Ganey patient experience surveys.ResultsOut of 855 patients scheduled, 421 patients completed telehealth encounters (49%), and 46 patients completed in-clinic visits (5.4%). A further 272 patients canceled appointments (32%), 123 patients were unable to be contacted (14%), and 8 patients declined care offered by telehealth (0.94%). Most patients who were cared for by telehealth returned to see optometrists (88%). By contrast, most patients who required in-person visits during this period were subsequently seen by ophthalmologists (58%, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction remained high for in-person visits that took place during the COVID-19-related emergency, with improvements noted in patient satisfaction regarding 'information about delays' (47 % versus 100%, p = 0.007) and 'concern for questions or worries' (76% versus 100%, p = 0.037) compared with the same period 1 year prior.ConclusionOptometrists rapidly embraced telehealth to deliver eye care to their patients during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Most eye issues were able to be addressed through telehealth; urgent eye problems were triaged and referred to the optometry clinic, when appropriate.

Project description:ImportanceThe COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) caused substantial changes in hospital operations. The net effect of these changes on hospital financial performance is unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in hospital financial performance before and during the COVID-19 PHE.Design, setting, and participantsThis longitudinal within-hospital cohort analysis from 2017 to 2021 used national RAND hospital data merged with American Community Survey data. A total of 4223 short-term acute care or critical access hospitals in the US with financial data spanning 2017 to 2021 were evaluated.ExposureFinancial performance during the first 2 years of the PHE.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcome was PHE financial distress calculated based on net operating income (operating revenue minus operating expenses). Within-hospital changes in net operating income over time were evaluated with and without COVID-19 relief funding. From henceforth, 2020/2021 means the weighted average financial performance for both calendar year 2020 and 2021. Hospitals were characterized as having new financial distress if (1) their average 2020/2021 net operating income was negative and (2) the average 2020/2021 net operating income was less than that hospital's pre-2020 net operating income. Predictors of new financial distress were evaluated using logistic regression and predictors of COVID-19 relief using 2-part models.ResultsIn this sample of 4423 hospitals, 3529 (80.0%) received PHE funds during 2020/2021. A total of 846 (19.1%) were located in a census tract with more than 20% Hispanic residents. Of the total number of hospitals, 720 (16.3%) of hospitals had PHE financial distress, whereas 2047 (46.3%) had PHE financial distress after excluding COVID-19 relief funding from net operating income. The majority of hospitals (n = 3337; 74.8%) had a positive net operating income across 2020/2021, with 785 (17.8%) hospitals moving from a negative pre-2020 to a positive 2020/2021 net operating income. In adjusted analyses, hospitals treating a higher proportion of Hispanic populations were more likely to have PHE distress (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .02). Median (IQR) operating margins from 2020/2021 were at an all-time high of 6.5% (0.2%-13.3%) compared with pre-2020 operating margins of 2.8% (-2.8% to 9.3%).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of US hospitals, the large majority had positive financial performance during 2020/2021, partly due to COVID-19 relief funds. However, hospitals serving Hispanic populations had substantially worsened financial performance during 2020/2021, even after accounting for COVID-19 relief. That COVID-19 relief funding aided in operating margins reaching all-time highs indicates funding amounts may have been larger than was necessary for many hospitals. With COVID-19 relief funding ending yet COVID-19 related continuing to affect hospital expenses, ongoing monitoring of hospital financial performance is vital to ensure patients retain access to care.

Dataset Information

COVOX: Providing oxygen during the COVID-19 health emergency.

Publications

COVOX: Providing oxygen during the COVID-19 health emergency.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets