Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of switching from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is little evidence of the effectiveness of switching from the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) bosentan and ambrisentan to a novel ERA, macitentan, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patients with PAH switching from other ERAs to macitentan.

Methods

We retrieved the relevant literature published before January 2022 for the meta-analysis from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Efficacy included changes in the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, hemodynamics, echocardiography and survival.

Results

Nine studies, consisting of 408 PAH patients, that met the inclusion criteria were included. The switch from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan effectively increased the 6MWD by 20.71 m (95% CI: 10.35-31.07, P < 0.00001, I ² = 0%). Six months after conversion, the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was found to improve from 19.0 ± 4.0 to 21.0 ± 5.0 mm in adults and from 16.00 ± 5.0 to 18.25 ± 4.8 mm in children. Ordinal logistic regression showed that the WHO-FC significantly improved by 0.412 (95% CI: 0.187-0.908, P = 0.028). The switch did not show significant improvement in NT-proBNP levels. In addition, the switch was well tolerated.

Conclusion

The switch from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan significantly increased the 6MWD in PAH patients, improved the WHO-FC, and exerted safety benefits. The effects of the switch on NT-proBNP levels, hemodynamics, and echocardiography still need to be further confirmed.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021292554].

SUBMITTER: Li J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9767980 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of switching from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Jie J Yang Zu-Yuan ZY Wang Shang S Yuan Ping P Zhao Qin-Hua QH Gong Su-Gang SG Qiu Hong-Ling HL Luo Ci-Jun CJ Li Hui-Ting HT Zhang Rui R Wu Wen-Hui WH Liu Jin-Ming JM Wang Lan L Liu Shan-Shan SS Jiang Rong R

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 20221207

<h4>Background</h4>There is little evidence of the effectiveness of switching from the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) bosentan and ambrisentan to a novel ERA, macitentan, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patients with PAH switching from other ERAs to macitentan.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrieved the relevant literature published before January 2022 for the meta-analysis ...[more]

PMID: 36568539

Similar Datasets

Project description:Even though pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains an incurable disease, the combination of PAH-specific therapies allowed evolving from symptom-based strategies to others aiming to move patients to low-risk conditions. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonists emerged as specific-PAH drugs that can be used in combination with other specific therapies. This work aimed to perform a prospective clinical assessment of patients with PAH that switched from bosentan to macitentan (POTENT), due to inadequate response. POTENT is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, uncontrolled study including PAH patients from our ongoing SAUDIPH registry. It enrolled 50 PAH patients divided as follows: idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (I/HPAH); n = 24; PAH associated with congenital heart disease, n = 19; PAH associated with connective tissue diseases, n = 5; and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and/or pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis (PVOD/PCH), n = 2. At baseline, most patients were in World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC) II/III (52.0%). After switching to macitentan, patients were more likely to be in WHO FC I/II (78%) and 22% of the overall cohort moved to a lower risk condition, with three low risk stratification parameters. Mean 6-min walking distance increased about 34 m after 12 months, with a significant mean change over time (12.63 ± 11.69 at month 3 vs. 40.75 ± 12.57 at month 12, p = 0.002). Most haemodynamic parameters decreased over time, with corresponding negative mean changes (p < 0.001). The safety of macitentan was confirmed by the absence of anaemia and liver injury; clinical worsening was observed only in a small group of patients. In general, macitentan might be a valid alternative to bosentan in PAH stable patients on combination therapy with insufficient clinical response, and presenting intermediate and high-risk parameters. We anticipate that studying this strategy in PAH subgroups would further clarify its potential and limitations.

Project description:BackgroundThree oral drugs (ambrisentan, bosentan, and sildenafil) have been widely used to treat patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). 1) There are no studies that directly compare the safety and efficacy of these three drugs. Existing studies could not meet the physician's need to select the most beneficial drugs for patients. 2) Principal component analysis is mainly used for scale analysis and has not been reported in clinical field. 3) When the results of the indirect meta-analysis were not satisfactory, no new solutions have been proposed in existing meta-analysis studies.MethodsThe overall process of this study is divided into 4 steps 1) literature search and data extraction; 2) principal component analysis; 3) common reference-based indirect comparison meta-analysis; 4) formal adjusted indirect comparison.ResultsNine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) experiments and eight long-term experiments were selected. The main influencing factors are mortality, 6-min walk distance (6MW), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), cardiac index (CI) by principal component analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity among the indirect meta-analysis of three drugs. But in the formal adjusted indirect comparison 1) the level of PAP of sildenafil group (60.5 ± 22.35, 220) was higher than that of the other three groups, placebo (53.5 ± 17.63, 507) (p < 0.001), ambrisentan (49.5 ± 15.08, 130) (p < 0.001), and bosentan (54.6 ± 118.41, 311) (p < 0.001); 2) the level of CI of sildenafil group (54 ± 18, 311) was higher than that of the other three groups, placebo (2.7 ± 1.09, 518) (p < 0.001), ambrisentan (2.5 ± 0.75, 130) (p < 0.001), and bosentan (2.5 ± 1.06, 333) (p < 0.001). In addition, sildenafil significantly improved the survival rate comparing with ambrisentan and bosentan.ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that sildenafil might be more suitable for long-term treatment of PAH patients than ambrisentan and bosentan. In order to enable clinicians to draw conclusions more quickly and directly in the data-rich literature, we suggest the use of principal component analysis combined with formal adjusted indirect comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of drugs.

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of ambrisentan has been previously evaluated in Chinese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan in a subgroup of connective tissue disease (CTD) patients with PAH.MethodsIn this open-label, single-arm study, patients received ambrisentan 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks, followed by 12-week dose titration period (dose up to 10 mg). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in exercise capacity (measured by 6-min walk test [6MWT]), N-terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels, WHO Functional Class (FC) and Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI) scores from baseline to weeks 12 and 24. Safety endpoints included time to clinical worsening and incidence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsIn total, 71 Chinese patients with CTD-PAH were included in this analysis. Ambrisentan treatment significantly improved exercise capacity (6MWT) from baseline (mean: 366.4 m) to week 12 (63.8 m, p < 0.001) and week 24 (73.2 m, p < 0.001). A significant reduction in NT-proBNP levels was observed from baseline (mean: 1837.5 ng/L) to week 12 (- 1156.8 ng/L, p < 0.001) and week 24 (- 1095.5 ng/L, p < 0.001). BDI scores decreased significantly at week 12 (- 0.6, p < 0.001) and week 24 (- 0.4, p = 0.002) from baseline (mean: 2.7). The WHO FC improved in 29 (40.8%) and 34 (47.9%) patients at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 52 (73.2%) patients. One patient (1.4%) experienced clinical worsening at week 24.ConclusionAmbrisentan showed significant improvement in exercise capacity and no clinical worsening in the majority of Chinese patients with CTD-PAH in the 24-week treatment period. The AEs observed in the CTD-PAH subgroup were consistent with the known safety profile of ambrisentan in the overall Chinese PAH population.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov Identifier, https://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT01808313 Registration date (first time): February 28, 2013.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough several new drugs have been approved in recent years, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a rapidly progressive disease with a poor prognosis. Ambrisentan, a selective endothelin type A antagonist, has been approved for treatment of PAH. This open label study assessed the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan in Chinese subjects with PAH.MethodsEligible patients with PAH (World Health Organisation [WHO] functional class [FC] II orIII) were enrolled and received Ambrisentan (5 mg) once daily for a 12-week preliminary evaluation period, and a 12-week dose-adjustment period (dose titration to 10 mgallowed). Endpoints included: change from baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6-MWD), N-Terminal Pro B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro-BNP), WHO FC, Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI), clinical worsening of PAH and incidences of adverse events (AE).ResultsOne hundred thirty-three subjects (85 % women, mean age: 36 years) with PAH (WHOFC II or III) were enrolled and received ambrisentan (5 mg) once daily for a 12-week preliminary evaluation period, and a 12-week dose-adjustment period. Mean (SD) duration of drug exposure was 161.7 (27.13) days. Ambrisentan (average daily dose of 6.27 mg) significantly improved exercise capacity (6MWD) from baseline (mean: 377.1 m [m]) at week 12 (+53.6 m, p < 0.001) (primary endpoint). Improvement in exercise capacity was noted as early as week 4, and was sustained up to week 24 (+ 64.4 m, p < 0.001). NT-pro-BNP plasma levels decreased significantly (p < 0.001) at week 12 (-861.4 ng/L) and week 24 (-806 ng/L) from baseline (mean: 1600.7 ng/L). The WHO FC showed improvements for 44 subjects at week 12 and 51 subjects at week 24. BDI scores decreased significantly at week 12 (-0.3, p < 0.001) and week 24 (-0.2, p = 0.003) from baseline (mean: 2.5). Four patients died during the study (sudden cardiac death [n = 2], cerebral haemorrhage [n = 1], cardiac failure [n = 1]). Drug related adverse events occurred in 34.3 % of subjects; peripheral oedema (11.2 %) and flushing (8.2 %) occurred most frequently.ConclusionAmbrisentan (5 and 10 mg, orally) significantly improved the exercise capacity in Chinese PAH subjects with a safety profile similar to that observed in global studies.Trial registrationNCT No. (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT01808313 ; Registration date (first time): February 28, 2013.

Project description:IntroductionEvaluating overall survival in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can often be confounded by bias introduced by treatment switching. SERAPHIN was a large RCT that evaluated the effects of long-term treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. In an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a non-significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality up to study closure was reported with macitentan 10 mg versus placebo. As patients could switch treatment when experiencing symptoms of disease progression, this analysis attempts to adjust for the confounding effects on overall survival.MethodsThe inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) and rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) models were used to estimate the treatment effect on overall mortality had there been no treatment switching in SERAPHIN. Time to all-cause death was evaluated up to study closure. Treatment switching was defined as patients in the placebo group switching to open-label macitentan 10 mg, and patients in the macitentan 10 mg group prematurely discontinuing macitentan.ResultsBy study closure, 73.2% (183/250) of patients in the placebo group had switched to macitentan 10 mg. Among these patients, exposure time to macitentan 10 mg represented 28.2% of total study treatment exposure (cumulative exposure 134.6 patient-years). At study closure, 24.8% (60/242) of patients in the macitentan 10 mg group were not receiving open-label macitentan; mean time not receiving macitentan was 44.3 weeks. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival using the IPCW and RPSFT methods were lower (HR 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.81; p = 0.009, and HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04, 2.83, respectively) than the ITT unadjusted HR (0.80, 95% CI 0.51, 1.24).ConclusionThese results from the current analyses indicate that in SERAPHIN, the standard ITT analysis was confounded by treatment switching resulting in an underestimation of the benefit of macitentan 10 mg on overall survival. By adjusting for switching, the IPCW and RPSFT models estimated a 58% and 67% reduction in risk of mortality, respectively, with macitentan 10 mg versus placebo.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00660179.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of switching from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Systematic review registration

Publications

Efficacy and safety of switching from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets