Structures of adenosine receptor A2BR bound to endogenous and synthetic agonists.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Cai H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9794776 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Structures of adenosine receptor A<sub>2B</sub>R bound to endogenous and synthetic agonists.
Cai Hongmin H Xu Youwei Y Guo Shimeng S He Xinheng X Sun Jun J Li Xin X Li Changyao C Yin Wanchao W Cheng Xi X Jiang Hualiang H Xu H Eric HE Xie Xin X Jiang Yi Y
Cell discovery 20221228 1
Similar Datasets
Project description:The adenosine A3 receptor (A3AR), a key member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, is a promising therapeutic target for inflammatory and cancerous conditions. The selective A3AR agonists, CF101 and CF102, are clinically significant, yet their recognition mechanisms remained elusive. Here we report the cryogenic electron microscopy structures of the full-length human A3AR bound to CF101 and CF102 with heterotrimeric Gi protein in complex at 3.3-3.2 Å resolution. These agonists reside in the orthosteric pocket, forming conserved interactions via their adenine moieties, while their 3-iodobenzyl groups exhibit distinct orientations. Functional assays reveal the critical role of extracellular loop 3 in A3AR's ligand selectivity and receptor activation. Key mutations, including His3.37, Ser5.42, and Ser6.52, in a unique sub-pocket of A3AR, significantly impact receptor activation. Comparative analysis with the inactive A2AAR structure highlights a conserved receptor activation mechanism. Our findings provide comprehensive insights into the molecular recognition and signaling of A3AR, paving the way for designing subtype-selective adenosine receptor ligands.
| S-EPMC11021478 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Liver receptor homolog 1 (NR5A2, LRH-1) is an orphan nuclear hormone receptor that regulates diverse biological processes, including metabolism, proliferation, and the resolution of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Although preclinical and cellular studies demonstrate that LRH-1 has great potential as a therapeutic target for metabolic diseases and cancer, development of LRH-1 modulators has been difficult. Recently, systematic modifications to one of the few known chemical scaffolds capable of activating LRH-1 failed to improve efficacy substantially. Moreover, mechanisms through which LRH-1 is activated by synthetic ligands are entirely unknown. Here, we use x-ray crystallography and other structural methods to explore conformational changes and receptor-ligand interactions associated with LRH-1 activation by a set of related agonists. Unlike phospholipid LRH-1 ligands, these agonists bind deep in the pocket and do not interact with residues near the mouth nor do they expand the pocket like phospholipids. Unexpectedly, two closely related agonists with similar efficacies (GSK8470 and RJW100) exhibit completely different binding modes. The dramatic repositioning is influenced by a differential ability to establish stable face-to-face π-π-stacking with the LRH-1 residue His-390, as well as by a novel polar interaction mediated by the RJW100 hydroxyl group. The differing binding modes result in distinct mechanisms of action for the two agonists. Finally, we identify a network of conserved water molecules near the ligand-binding site that are important for activation by both agonists. This work reveals a previously unappreciated complexity associated with LRH-1 agonist development and offers insights into rational design strategies.
| S-EPMC5207232 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Blockade of the adenosine A2B receptor (A2BAR) represents a potential novel strategy for the immunotherapy of cancer. In the present study, we designed, synthesized, and characterized irreversible A2BAR antagonists based on an 8-p-sulfophenylxanthine scaffold. Irreversible binding was confirmed in radioligand binding and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer(BRET)-based Gα15 protein activation assays by performing ligand wash-out and kinetic experiments. p-(1-Propylxanthin-8-yl)benzene sulfonyl fluoride (6a, PSB-21500) was the most potent and selective irreversible A2BAR antagonist of the present series with an apparent Ki value of 10.6 nM at the human A2BAR and >38-fold selectivity versus the other AR subtypes. The corresponding 3-cyclopropyl-substituted xanthine derivative 6c (PSB-21502) was similarly potent, but was non-selective versus A1- and A2AARs. Attachment of a reactive sulfonyl fluoride group to an elongated xanthine 8-substituent (12, Ki 7.37 nM) resulted in a potent, selective, reversibly binding antagonist. Based on previous docking studies, the lysine residue K2697.32 was proposed to react with the covalent antagonists. However, the mutant K269L behaved similarly to the wildtype A2BAR, indicating that 6a and related irreversible A2BAR antagonists do not interact with K2697.32. The new irreversible A2BAR antagonists will be useful tools and have the potential to be further developed as therapeutic drugs.
| S-EPMC9231011 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms regulate many important signaling pathways. Here, we report that PKC activation by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) enhanced A2B adenosine receptor (AR)-mediated, but not β2-adrenergic receptor-mediated, cAMP accumulation, in H9C2 cardiomyocyte-like and HEK293 cells. In addition to enhancement, PKC (PMA-treatment) also activated A2BAR with low Emax (H9C2 and NIH3T3 cells endogenously expressing A2BAR), or with high Emax (A2BAR-overexpressing HEK293 cells) to induce cAMP accumulation. A2BAR activation induced by PKC was inhibited by A2BAR and PKC inhibitors but enhanced by A2BAR overexpression. Gαi isoforms and PKCγ isoform were found to be involved in both enhancement of A2BAR function and A2BAR activation. Thus, we establish PKC as an endogenous modulator and activator of A2BAR, involving Giα and PKCγ. Depending on signaling pathway, PKC could activate and enhance, or alternatively inhibit A2BAR activity. These findings are relevant to common functions of A2BAR and PKC, e.g. cardioprotection and cancer progression/treatment.
| S-EPMC10316653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RationaleOne hallmark of tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) is the promotion of cancer progression by stimulating angiogenesis. This study was performed to evaluate the role of adenosine receptors in TEX-induced angiogenesis.MethodsTEX produced by UMSCC47 head and neck cancer cell line were isolated by mini size exclusion chromatography (mini-SEC). Enzymatic activity of ectonucleotidases CD39/CD73 carried by TEX was measured by HPLC. Adenosine content of TEX was measured by UPLC-MS/MS. Primary human macrophages were co-incubated with TEX or exosomes derived from the plasma of head and neck cancer patients and their marker expression profile was analyzed by flow cytometry. The macrophage secretome was analyzed by angiogenesis arrays. The in vitro angiogenic potential of TEX was evaluated in endothelial growth studies. Results were validated in vivo using basement membrane extract plug assays in A1R-/-, A2AR-/- and A2BR-/- rats. Vascularization was analyzed by hemoglobin quantification and immunohistology with vessel and macrophage markers.ResultsTEX carried enzymatically active CD39/CD73 and adenosine. TEX promoted A2BR-mediated polarization of macrophages toward an M2-like phenotype (p < 0.05) and enhanced their secretion of angiogenic factors. Growth of endothelial cells was stimulated directly by TEX and indirectly via macrophage-reprogramming dependent on A2BR signaling (p < 0.01). In vivo, TEX stimulated the formation of defined vascular structures and macrophage infiltration. This response was absent in A2BR-/- rats (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis report provides the first evidence for adenosine production by TEX to promote angiogenesis via A2BR. A2BR antagonism emerges as a potential strategy to block TEX-induced angiogenesis.
| S-EPMC7529853 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A series of adenosine and 2'-deoxyadenosine pairs modified with a 1,12-dicarba-closo-dodecaborane cluster or alternatively with a phenyl group at the same position was synthesized, and their affinity was determined at A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). While AR affinity differences were noted, a general tendency to preferentially bind A3 AR over other ARs was observed for most tested ligands. In particular, 5'-ethylcarbamoyl-N6-(3-phenylpropyl)adenosine (18), N6-(3-phenylpropyl)-2-chloroadenosine (24) and N6-(3-phenylpropyl)adenosine (40) showed nanomolar A3 affinity (Ki 4.5, 6.4 and 7.5 nM, respectively). Among the boron cluster-containing compounds, the highest A3 affinity (Ki 206 nM) was for adenosine derivative 41 modified at C2. In the matched molecular pairs, analogs bearing boron clusters were found to show lower binding affinity for adenosine receptors than the corresponding phenyl analogs. Nevertheless, interestingly, several boron cluster modified adenosine ligands showed significantly higher A3 receptor selectivity than the corresponding phenyl analogs: 7vs. 8, 15vs. 16, 17vs. 18.
| S-EPMC8448983 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Adenosine is known to exert most of its physiological functions by acting as local modulator at four receptor subtypes named A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) (ARs). Principally as a result of the difficulty in identifying potent and selective agonists, the A(2B) AR is the least extensively characterised of the adenosine receptors family. Despite these limitations, growing understanding of the physiological meaning of this target indicates promising therapeutic perspectives for specific ligands. As A(2B) AR signalling seems to be associated with pre/postconditioning cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, selective agonists may represent a new therapeutic group for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. Herein we present an overview of the recent advancements in identifying potent and selective A(2B) AR agonists reported in scientific and patent literature. These compounds can be classified into adenosine-like and nonadenosine ligands. Nucleoside-based agonists are the result of modifying adenosine by substitution at the N (6)-, C(2)-positions of the purine heterocycle and/or at the 5'-position of the ribose moiety or combinations of these substitutions. Compounds 1-deoxy-1-{6-[N'-(furan-2-carbonyl)-hydrazino]-9H-purin-9-yl}-N-ethyl-beta-D-ribofuranuronamide (19, hA(1) K (i) = 1050 nM, hA(2A) K (i) = 1550 nM, hA(2B) EC(50) = 82 nM, hA(3) K (i) > 5 muM) and its 2-chloro analogue 23 (hA(1) K (i) = 3500 nM, hA(2A) K (i) = 4950 nM, hA(2B) EC(50) = 210 nM, hA(3) K (i) > 5 muM) were confirmed to be potent and selective full agonists in a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) functional assay in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing hA(2B) AR. Nonribose ligands are represented by conveniently substituted dicarbonitrilepyridines, among which 2-[6-amino-3,5-dicyano-4-[4-(cyclopropylmethoxy)phenyl]pyridin-2-ylsulfanyl]acetamide (BAY-60-6583, hA(1), hA(2A), hA(3) EC(50) > 10 muM; hA(2B) EC(50) = 3 nM) is currently under preclinical-phase investigation for treating coronary artery disorders and atherosclerosis.
| S-EPMC2583210 | biostudies-other
Project description:Adenosine receptors and β-adrenoceptors are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that activate intracellular G proteins on binding the agonists adenosine or noradrenaline, respectively. GPCRs have similar structures consisting of seven transmembrane helices that contain well-conserved sequence motifs, indicating that they are probably activated by a common mechanism. Recent structures of β-adrenoceptors highlight residues in transmembrane region 5 that initially bind specifically to agonists rather than to antagonists, indicating that these residues have an important role in agonist-induced activation of receptors. Here we present two crystal structures of the thermostabilized human adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R-GL31) bound to its endogenous agonist adenosine and the synthetic agonist NECA. The structures represent an intermediate conformation between the inactive and active states, because they share all the features of GPCRs that are thought to be in a fully activated state, except that the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix 6 partially occludes the G-protein-binding site. The adenine substituent of the agonists binds in a similar fashion to the chemically related region of the inverse agonist ZM241385 (ref. 8). Both agonists contain a ribose group, not found in ZM241385, which extends deep into the ligand-binding pocket where it makes polar interactions with conserved residues in H7 (Ser 277(7.42) and His 278(7.43); superscripts refer to Ballesteros-Weinstein numbering) and non-polar interactions with residues in H3. In contrast, the inverse agonist ZM241385 does not interact with any of these residues and comparison with the agonist-bound structures indicates that ZM241385 sterically prevents the conformational change in H5 and therefore it acts as an inverse agonist. Comparison of the agonist-bound structures of A(2A)R with the agonist-bound structures of β-adrenoceptors indicates that the contraction of the ligand-binding pocket caused by the inward motion of helices 3, 5 and 7 may be a common feature in the activation of all GPCRs.
| S-EPMC3146096 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We used the GEnSeMBLE Monte Carlo method to predict ensemble of the 20 best packings (helix rotations and tilts) based on the neutral total energy (E) from a vast number (10 trillion) of potential packings for each of the four subtypes of the adenosine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are involved in many cytoprotective functions. We then used the DarwinDock Monte Carlo methods to predict the binding pose for the human A(3) adenosine receptor (hAA(3)R) for subtype selective agonists and antagonists. We found that all four A(3) agonists stabilize the 15th lowest conformation of apo-hAA(3)R while also binding strongly to the 1st and 3rd. In contrast the four A(3) antagonists stabilize the 2nd or 3rd lowest conformation. These results show that different ligands can stabilize different GPCR conformations, which will likely affect function, complicating the design of functionally unique ligands. Interestingly all agonists lead to a trans χ1 angle for W6.48 that experiments on other GPCRs associate with G-protein activation while all 20 apo-AA(3)R conformations have a W6.48 gauche+ χ1 angle associated experimentally with inactive GPCRs for other systems. Thus docking calculations have identified critical ligand-GPCR structures involved with activation. We found that the predicted binding site for selective agonist Cl-IB-MECA to the predicted structure of hAA(3)R shows favorable interactions to three subtype variable residues, I253(6.58), V169(EL2), and Q167(EL2), while the predicted structure for hAA(2A)R shows weakened to the corresponding amino acids: T256(6.58), E169(EL2), and L167(EL2), explaining the observed subtype selectivity.
| S-EPMC3092833 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Activation of the A3 adenosine receptor (AR) is associated with cerebroprotective, cardioprotective, and anticancer effects. Among potent and selective A3 AR agonists are novel methanocarba adenosine analogues in which the conformation of a pseudo-ribose moiety is locked in the North (N) hemisphere of the pseudorotational cycle. 5'-Uronamide (N)-methanocarba nucleosides, such as MRS1898 and MRS2346, are examples of full agonists of the human A3 AR. An improved convergent approach from easily accessible 2,3-O-isopropylidene-d-erythrose (2b), and the combination of a strategic intramolecular cyclopropanation step plus the acid-catalyzed isomerization of an isopropylidene group, provided a suitable pseudosugar precursor (23) for the synthesis of MRS1898, MRS2346, and related analogues. This new synthetic route uses readily available building blocks and opens the way for the preparation of a variety of targets on a reasonable scale.
| S-EPMC11749803 | biostudies-literature