Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Physiological adaptations and myocellular stress in short-term, high-frequency blood flow restriction training: A scoping review.


ABSTRACT:

Background

High frequency (1-2 times per day) low-intensity blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been recommended as a prescription approach for short durations of time to maximize relevant physiological adaptations. However, some studies demonstrate negative physiological changes after short periods of high-frequency BFR training, including prolonged strength decline and muscle fiber atrophy.

Objectives

To provide a comprehensive overview of short-term, high-frequency blood flow restriction training, including main adaptations, myocellular stress, limitations in the literature, and future perspectives.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed®, and Web of Science) was performed from the earliest record to April 23, 2022. Two independent reviewers selected experimental studies that analyzed physical training protocols (aerobic or resistance) of high weekly frequency (>4 days/week) and short durations (≤3 weeks).

Results

In total, 22 studies were included in this review. The samples were composed exclusively of young predominantly male individuals. Muscle strength and hypertrophy were the main outcomes analyzed in the studies. In general, studies have demonstrated increases in strength and muscle size after short term (1-3 weeks), high-frequency low-intensity BFR training, non-failure, but not after control conditions (non-BFR; equalized training volume). Under failure conditions, some studies have demonstrated strength decline and muscle fiber atrophy after BFR conditions, accompanying increases in muscle damage markers. Significant limitations exist in the current HF-BFR literature due to large heterogeneities in methodologies.

Conclusion

The synthesis presented indicates that short-term, high-frequency BFR training programs can generate significant neuromuscular adaptations. However, in resistance training to failure, strength declines and muscle fiber atrophy were reported. Currently, there are no studies analyzing low-frequency vs. high-frequency in short-term BFR training. Comparisons between resistance exercises of similar intensities (e.g., combined effort) are lacking, limiting conclusions on whether the effect is a product of proximity to failure or a specific effect of BFR.

SUBMITTER: de Queiros VS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9803189 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Physiological adaptations and myocellular stress in short-term, high-frequency blood flow restriction training: A scoping review.

de Queiros Victor Sabino VS   Rolnick Nicholas N   de Alcântara Varela Phelipe Wilde PW   Cabral Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinôco BGAT   Silva Dantas Paulo Moreira PM  

PloS one 20221230 12


<h4>Background</h4>High frequency (1-2 times per day) low-intensity blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been recommended as a prescription approach for short durations of time to maximize relevant physiological adaptations. However, some studies demonstrate negative physiological changes after short periods of high-frequency BFR training, including prolonged strength decline and muscle fiber atrophy.<h4>Objectives</h4>To provide a comprehensive overview of short-term, high-frequency blood  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6746941 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8850930 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9083008 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5491153 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7369875 | biostudies-literature
2023-12-17 | PXD047890 |
| S-EPMC7520222 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11528959 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7326162 | biostudies-literature
2015-05-08 | E-GEOD-68646 | biostudies-arrayexpress