Blood loss after total en bloc spondylectomy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: De la Garza Ramos R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9808100 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Blood loss after total <i>en bloc</i> spondylectomy.
De la Garza Ramos Rafael R Ryvlin Jessica J Yassari Reza R
Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) 20221201 4
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundTotal en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a widely accepted surgical technique for primary spinal bone tumours but is frequently accompanied by substantial peri-operative blood loss. Prior studies have reported estimated blood loss (EBL) can reach up to 3,200 mL. The aim of this study is to estimate the blood loss during TES procedures performed in the last ten years at our tertiary referral centre and compare EBL with actual blood loss (ABL).MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all cases managed surgically with TES referred to our centre between 2005 and 2015. We recorded the oncological characteristics of each tumour and surgical management in terms of resection margins, operative duration and instrumentation. Data relating to peri-operative blood loss was also recorded including an estimation of total blood loss, the use of cell salvage where applicable and transfusion rates.ResultsA total of 21 patients were found to meet our inclusion criteria. There were 11 men and 10 women, with a median age of 40 years. The mean total ABL was 3,310 mL. Total operation time ranged from 6.53 to 19.7 h. Compared to ABL, in 59% of cases EBL had been underestimated by an average of 78% by volume. The EBL of the remaining 41% cases had been overestimated by 43%. This was not statistically significant (P=0.373). Cell salvage was used in 62% patients with a mean blood loss of 2,845 mL (884-4,939 mL) and transfusion of 3.8 units (0-12 units) versus 4,069 mL (297-8,335 mL) and 9.3 units (0-18 units) in those not managed with cell salvage. There was no significant difference in ABL between the cell salvage and non-cell salvage groups.ConclusionsWe report one of the largest case series in TES for primary bone tumours. EBL is not a reliable predictor for ABL. A large blood loss should be anticipated and use of cell salvage is recommended.
| S-EPMC9547703 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To compare total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for single spinal metastasis, we undertook a single center retrospective study. We identified patients who had undergone TES or SABR for a single spinal metastasis between 2000 and 2019. Medical records and images were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, and oncologic outcomes. Patients who received TES were matched to those who received SABR to compare local control and survival. A total of 89 patients were identified, of whom 20 and 69 received TES and SABR, respectively. A total of 38 matched patients were analyzed (19 TES and 19 SABR). The median follow-up period was 54.4 (TES) and 26.1 months (SABR) for matched patients. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 66.7% and 72.2% in the TES and 38.9% and 50.7% in the SABR group, respectively. At the final follow-up of the matched cohorts, no significant differences were noted in OS (p = 0.554), PFS (p = 0.345) or local progression (p = 0.133). The rate of major complications was higher in the TES than in the SABR group (21.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.660). These findings suggest that SABR leads to fewer complications compared to TES, while TES exhibits better mid-term control of metastatic tumors.
| S-EPMC10705804 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo obtain a better understanding of the structures around L5 vertebra and provide some anatomical evidence of the feasibility of total en-bloc spondylectomy (TES) on L5 in a posterior-only approach.Methods12 simulated TESs on L5 by a posterior-only approach were conducted on human cadavers. The distance between the traction point of L4 nerve root and the dural sac (Da), the anterior-posterior diameter of the vertebral body,(Va), the distance between the start point of L4 nerve root and the traction point of L5 nerve root (Dh) and the height of the vertebral body (Vh) were measured. Paired t-test and liner regression were performed to determine the difference and correlation between Da and Va, and between Dh and Vh. The risk of nerve roots or blood vessels damages, and the obstruction caused by iliac wings were evaluated.ResultsLiner correlations were found between Da and Va, and between Dh and Vh. The regression equations were Da = 0.6673Va + 11.28 and Dh = 1.009Vh + 1.003. There are statistical significant differences between Dh and Vh, and between Da and Va in those whose Va < 34.96 mm. Nerve roots or blood vessels damages and the obstruction caused by iliac wing were able to be avoided.ConclusionsIf the patient has an anterior-posterior diameter of L5 vertebral body shorter than 34.96 mm, it is possible that the vertebral body can be taken out during TES in a posterior-only approach. Prevention of nerve roots or blood vessels damages, and the obstruction caused by iliac wings are difficulties of this procedure yet not insurmountable. TES on L5 by a posterior-only approach might a possible alternative in treating diseases like L5 vertebral body tumors.
| S-EPMC6260441 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTotal en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is an important surgical treatment for spinal tumors that can achieve en bloc resection of the affected vertebral body by using the T-saw. However, the conventional TES process and the surgical instruments currently in use have some inconveniences, which may lead to longer operative times and a higher incidence of complications. To address these obstacles, we developed a modified TES technique using a homemade intervertebral hook blade. The objectives of this study were to describe our modified total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) using a homemade intervertebral hook blade and to assess its clinical effects in patients with spinal tumors.MethodsTwenty-three consecutive patients with spinal tumors were included from September 2018 to November 2021. Eleven patients underwent a modified TES using an intervertebral hook blade, and 12 patients underwent a conventional TES using a wire saw. Details of the modified technique for TES were depicted, and the intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and improvement in pain symptom and neurological function measured by visual analog score (VAS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score of all patients was reviewed and analyzed. Nonparametric analysis of covariates (ANCOVA) was performed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients treated with modified TES and conventional TES.ResultsThe modified TES significantly reduced operative time (F = 7.935, p = 0.010) and achieved favorable improvement of neurological function (F = 0.570, p = 0.459) and relief of pain (F = 3.196, p = 0.088) compared with the conventional TES group. The mean intraoperative blood loss in the modified TES group (2381.82 ml) was lower than that in the conventional TES group (3558.33 ml), although the difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.677, p = 0.420).ConclusionsModified TES using the intervertebral hook blade can effectively reduce the operation time and intraoperative bleeding, and meanwhile ensure the improvement of neurological function and relief of pain symptoms, suggesting that this modified technique is feasible, safe, and effective for spinal tumors.
| S-EPMC10235171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveMulti-segmental total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) gradually became more commonly used by clinicians. However, the choice of surgical strategy is unclear. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical performance of different prosthesis types and fixation ranges in multisegmental TES.MethodsIn this study, a validated finite element model of T12-L2 post-spondylectomy operations were carried out. The prostheses of these models used either 3D-printed artificial vertebrae or titanium mesh cages. The fixed range was two or three segment levels. Range of motion, stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system, intervertebral disc pressure, and facet joint surface force of four postoperative models and intact model in flexion and extension, as well as lateral bending and rotation were analyzed and compared.ResultsThe type of prosthesis used in the anterior column reconstruction mainly affected the stress of the adjacent endplate and the prosthesis itself. The posterior fixation range had a greater influence on the overall range of motion (ROM), the ROM of the adjacent segment, the stress of the screw-rod system, and adjacent facet joint surface force. For the model of the same prosthesis, the increase of fixed length resulted in an obvious reduction of ROM. The maximal decrease was 70.23% during extension, and the minimal decrease was 30.19% during rotation.ConclusionIn three-segment TES, the surgical strategy of using 3D-printed artificial prosthesis for anterior column support and pedicle screws for posterior fixation at both two upper and lower levels respectively can reduce the stress on internal fixation system, endplates, and adjacent intervertebral discs, resulting in a reduced risk of internal fixation failure, and ASD development.
| S-EPMC11456706 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) effectively treats spinal tumors. The surgery requires a vertebral body replacement (VBR), for which several solutions were developed, whereas the biomechanical differences between these devices still need to be completely understood. This study aimed to compare a femur graft, a polyetheretherketone implant (PEEK-IMP-C), a titan mesh cage (MESH-C), and a polymethylmethacrylate replacement (PMMA-C) using a finite element model of the lumbar spine after a TES of L3. Several biomechanical parameters (rotational stiffness, segmental range of motion (ROM), and von Mises stress) were assessed to compare the VBRs. All models provided adequate initial stability by increasing the rotational stiffness and decreasing the ROM between L2 and L4. The PMMA-C had the highest stiffness for flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (215%, 216%, and 170% of intact model), and it had the lowest segmental ROM in the instrumented segment (0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.7°, respectively). Maximum endplate stress was similar for PMMA-C and PEEK-IMP-C but lower for both compared to MESH-C across all loading directions. These results suggest that PMMA-C had similar or better primary spinal stability than other VBRs, which may be related to the larger contact surface and the potential to adapt to the patient's anatomy.
| S-EPMC10618450 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs.ResultsThe overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively.ConclusionUsing 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.
| S-EPMC11224740 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Three dimensional (3D)-printing technology facilitates complex spine surgery with unique advantages in artificial vertebral body design and manufacturing. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate how a 3D-printed spinal implant is utilized in the management of multi-level spinal tumors and integrates with comprehensive oncologic treatment. Eight spinal or paraspinal tumor patients requiring spinal reconstruction after total en bloc spondylectomy were selected as candidates for 3D-printed titanium artificial vertebral body implants. All patients underwent surgery on three or more vertebral segments or complex spinal junction segments. The clinical, oncological, and surgical characteristics of patients were collected. Of the eight candidates, seven suffered from pain and/or limb disorder. Six underwent successful 3D-printed spinal implantation, while two failed due to implant mismatching and were converted to conventional reconstruction. Of the six patients undergoing 3D-printed spinal implant surgery: (i) Five had recurrent tumors; (ii) three underwent neoadjuvant therapy; (iii) the median surgery time was 414 min; (iv) the median blood loss was 2150 ml; (v) the median blood transfusion was 2000 ml; (vi) the median length of hospital stay was 9 days; (vii) four patients received adjuvant therapy after surgery; and (viii) all patients experienced no pain, moved freely, and had no local recurrence at a median of 11.5 months post-operative follow-up. Spinal reconstruction with a 3D-printed titanium artificial vertebral body allows for total en bloc resection of complex multi-level spinal tumors. Combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, these patients had excellent postoperative outcomes, long-term normal spinal function, and associated low local recurrence probability.
| S-EPMC9468956 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOver the years, en bloc spondylectomy has proven its efficacy in controlling spinal tumors and improving survival rates. However, there are few reports of large series that critically evaluate the results of multilevel en bloc spondylectomies for spinal neoplasms.Questions/purposesUsing data from a large spine tumor center, we answered the following questions: (1) Does multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy result in acceptable function, survival rates, and local control in spinal neoplasms? (2) Is reconstruction after this procedure feasible? (3) What complications are associated with this procedure? (4) is it possible to achieve adequate surgical margins with this procedure?MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 38 patients undergoing multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy by a single surgeon (AL) from 1994 to 2011. Indications for this procedure were primary spinal sarcomas, solitary metastases, and aggressive primary benign tumors involving multiple segments of the thoracic or lumbar spine. Patients had to be medically fit and have no visceral metastases. Analysis was by chart and radiographic review. Margin quality was classified into intralesional, marginal, and wide. Radiographs, MR images, and CT scans were studied for local recurrence. Graft healing and instrumentation failures at subsequent followup were assessed. Complications were divided into major or minor and further classified as intraoperative and early and late postoperative. We evaluated the oncologic status using cumulative disease-specific and metastases-free survival analysis. Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 39 months; range, 24-124 months).ResultsOf the 38 patients, 34 (89%) were alive and walking without support at final followup. Thirty-one (81%) had no evidence of disease. Two patients died postoperatively and another two died of systemic disease (without local recurrence). Only three patients (8%) had a local recurrence. There were 14 major complications and 22 minor complications in 25 patients (65%). Only one patient required revision of implants secondary to mechanical failure. Two cases of cage subsidence were noted but had no clinical significance. Wide margins were achieved in nine patients (23%), marginal in 25 (66%), and intralesional in four (11%).ConclusionsIn patients with multisegmental spinal tumors, oncologic resections were achieved by multilevel en bloc spondylectomy and led to an acceptable survival rate with reasonable local control. Multilevel en bloc surgery was associated with a high complication rate; however, most patients recovered from their complications. Although the surgical procedure is challenging, our encouraging mid-term results clearly favor and validate this technique.Level of evidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
| S-EPMC4317411 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionTomita En-bloc spondylectomy of L5 is one of the most challenging techniques in radical oncological spine surgery. A 42-year-old female was referred with lower back pain and L5 radiculopathy with a background of right shoulder liposarcoma excision. CT-PET confirmed a solitary L5 oligometastasis. MRI showed thecal sac indentation hence wasn't suitable for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) alone. The seeding nature of sarcoma prevents the indication of separation surgery hence excisional surgery is considered for radical curative treatment. This case report demonstrates dual-staged modified TES including the utilisation of novel techniques to allow for maximum radical oncological control in the era of SABR and lesser invasive surgery.MethodsFirst-stage: Carbonfibre pedicle screws planned from L2 to S2AI-Pelvis, aligned, to her patient-specific rods. Radiofrequency ablation of L5 pedicles prior to osteotomy was performed to prevent sarcoma cell seeding. Microscope-assisted thecal sac tumour separation and L5 nerve root dissection was performed. Novel surgical navigation of the ultrasonic bone-cutter assisted inferior L4 and superior S1 endplate osteotomies. Second-stage: Vascular-assisted retroperitoneal approach at L4-S1 was undertaken protecting the great vessels. Completion of osteotomies at L4 and S1 to En-bloc L5: (L4 inferior endplate, L4/5 disc, L5 body, L5/S1 disc and S1 superior endplate). Anterior reconstruction used an expandable PEEK cage obviating the need for a third posterior stage. Reinforced with a patient-specific carbon plate L4-S1 promontory.ResultsPatient rehabilitated well and was discharged after 42 days. Cyberknife of 30Gy in 5 fractions was delivered two months post-op. Despite left foot drop, she's walking independently 9 months post-op.ConclusionThese are challenging cases require a truly multi-disciplinary team approach. We share this technique for a dual stage TES and metal-free construct with post adjuvant SABR to achieve maximum local control in spinal oligometastatic disease. This case promotes our modified TES technique in the era of SABR and separation surgery in carefully selected cases.
| S-EPMC10033756 | biostudies-literature