Dataset Information

Toxicity Rank Order (TRO) As a New Approach for Toxicity Prediction by QSAR Models.

ABSTRACT: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models are commonly used for risk assessment of emerging contaminants. The objective of this study was to use a toxicity rank order (TRO) as an integrating parameter to improve the toxicity prediction by QSAR models. TRO for each contaminant was calculated from collected toxicity data including acute toxicity concentration and no observed effect concentration. TRO values associated with toxicity mechanisms were used to classify pollutants into three modes of action consisting of narcosis, transition and reactivity. The selection principle of parameters for QSAR models was established and verified. It showed a reasonable prediction of toxicities caused by organophosphates and benzene derivatives, especially. Compared with traditional procedures, incorporating TRO showed an improved correlation coefficient of QSAR models by approximately 10%. Our study indicated that the proposed procedure can be used for screening modeling parameter data and improve the toxicity prediction by QSAR models, and this could facilitate prediction and evaluation of environmental contaminant toxicity.

SUBMITTER: Chen Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9819504 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Toxicity Rank Order (TRO) As a New Approach for Toxicity Prediction by QSAR Models.

Chen Yuting Y Dong Yuying Y Li Le L Jiao Jian J Liu Sitong S Zou Xuejun X

International journal of environmental research and public health 20221230 1

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models are commonly used for risk assessment of emerging contaminants. The objective of this study was to use a toxicity rank order (TRO) as an integrating parameter to improve the toxicity prediction by QSAR models. TRO for each contaminant was calculated from collected toxicity data including acute toxicity concentration and no observed effect concentration. TRO values associated with toxicity mechanisms were used to classify pollutants into ...[more]

PMID: 36613021

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFast, memory-efficient, and reliable algorithms for estimating genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for multiple traits and environments are needed to make timely decisions in breeding. Multivariate genomic prediction exploits genetic correlations between traits and environments to increase accuracy of GEBV compared to univariate methods. These genetic correlations are estimated simultaneously with GEBV, because they are specific to year, environment, and management. However, estimating genetic parameters is computationally demanding with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian samplers, and canonical transformations or orthogonalizations cannot be used for unbalanced experimental designs.MethodsWe propose a multivariate randomized Gauss-Seidel algorithm for simultaneous estimation of model effects and genetic parameters. Two previously proposed methods for estimating genetic parameters were combined with a Gauss-Seidel (GS) solver, and were called Tilde-Hat-GS (THGS) and Pseudo-Expectation-GS (PEGS). Balanced and unbalanced experimental designs were simulated to compare runtime, bias and accuracy of GEBV, and bias and standard errors of estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations of THGS, PEGS, and REML. Models with 10 to 400 response variables, 1279 to 42,034 genetic markers, and 5990 to 1.85 million observations were fitted.ResultsRuntime of PEGS and THGS was a fraction of REML. Accuracies of GEBV were slightly lower than those from REML, but higher than those from the univariate approach, hence THGS and PEGS exploited genetic correlations. For 500 to 600 observations per response variable, biases of estimates of genetic parameters of THGS and PEGS were small, but standard errors of estimates of genetic correlations were higher than for REML. Bias and standard errors decreased as sample size increased. For balanced designs, GEBV and estimates of genetic correlations from THGS were unbiased when only an intercept and eigenvectors of genotype scores were fitted.ConclusionsTHGS and PEGS are fast and memory-efficient algorithms for multivariate genomic prediction for balanced and unbalanced experimental designs. They are scalable for increasing numbers of environments and genetic markers. Accuracy of GEBV was comparable to REML. Estimates of genetic parameters had little bias, but their standard errors were larger than for REML. More studies are needed to evaluate the proposed methods for datasets that contain selection.

Project description:Chagas disease is a parasitosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. Cruzain, the major cysteine protease from T. cruzi, is an excellent therapeutic target in the search for antichagasic drugs. It is important in the role of cell invasion, replication, differentiation, and metabolism of the parasite. In this work, we developed and assessed multiple quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for a set of 61 cruzain inhibitors. These models include two-dimensional (2D) QSAR, three-dimensional (3D) QSAR, such as comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA), and Hologram QSAR (HQSAR). In total, we generated 10 major and 114 minor model variations. Molecular docking was used to successfully align the molecules. All CoMFA and CoMSIA models, which incorporate multiple fields, demonstrated robustness in our analysis. Steric fields exhibited satisfactory convergence in the contour maps, while the electrostatic field converged into a single small region. The HQSAR model taking into consideration only Atoms and Connectivity, with fragment sizes ranging from two to five atoms, was considered the best of the HQSAR variations, despite exhibiting a higher level of deviance. In total, 78 model variations meet the minimum requirements to be considered acceptable. We found that using as few as five descriptors it is possible to obtain robust results with 2D-QSAR. Models such as Random Forest, Tree Ensemble, Linear Regression, and HQSAR are recommended for working with large data sets, while the 3D-QSAR models are intended to study the geometry of the ligands, to optimize them into new and better performing antichagasics. Virtual Screening of a set of hydrazones, guided by the top-performing models, identified promising candidates for experimental validation. Among them, dv007 and dv015 exhibited consistently high predicted pIC50 values (7.26 and 7.24, respectively), making them compelling candidates for further drug development.

Project description:The ability of accurate predictions of biological response (biological activity/property/toxicity) of a given chemical makes the quantitative structure-activity/property/toxicity relationship (QSAR/QSPR/QSTR) models unique among the in silico tools. In addition, experimental data of selected species can also be used as an independent variable along with other structural as well as physicochemical variables to predict the response for different species formulating quantitative activity-activity relationship (QAAR)/quantitative structure-activity-activity relationship (QSAAR) approach. Irrespective of the models' type, the developed model's quality, and reliability need to be checked through multiple classical stringent validation metrics. Among the validation metrics, error-based metrics are more significant as the basic idea of a good predictive model is to improve the predictions' quality by lowering the predicted residuals for new query compounds. Following the concept, we have checked the predictive quality of the QSAR and QSAAR models employing kernel-weighted local polynomial regression (KwLPR) approach over the traditional linear and non-linear regression-based approaches tools such as multiple linear regression (MLR) and k nearest neighbors (kNN). Five datasets which were previously modeled using linear and non-linear regression method were considered to implement the KwPLR approach, followed by comparison of their validation metrics outcomes. For all five cases, the KwLPR based models reported better results over the traditional approaches. The present study's focus is not to develop a better or improved QSAR/QSAAR model over the previous ones, but to demonstrate the advantage, prediction power, and reliability of the KwLPR algorithm and establishing it as a novel, powerful cheminformatic tool. To facilitate the use of the KwLPR algorithm for QSAR/QSPR/QSTR/QSAAR modeling, the authors provide an in-house developed KwLPR.RMD script under the open-source R programming language.

Project description:Human health risk assessment for environmental chemical exposure is limited by a vast majority of chemicals with little or no experimental in vivo toxicity data. Data gap filling techniques, such as quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models based on chemical structure information, can predict hazard in the absence of experimental data. Risk assessment requires identification of a quantitative point-of-departure (POD) value, the point on the dose-response curve that marks the beginning of a low-dose extrapolation. This study presents two sets of QSAR models to predict POD values (PODQSAR) for repeat dose toxicity. For training and validation, a publicly available in vivo toxicity dataset for 3592 chemicals was compiled using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxicity Value database (ToxValDB). The first set of QSAR models predict point-estimates of POD values (PODQSAR) using structural and physicochemical descriptors for repeat dose study types and species combinations. A random forest QSAR model using study type and species as descriptors showed the best performance, with an external test set root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.71 log10-mg/kg/day and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.53. The second set of QSAR models predict the 95% confidence intervals for PODQSAR using a constructed POD distribution with a mean equal to the median POD value and a standard deviation of 0.5 log10-mg/kg/day, based on previously published typical study-to-study variability that may lead to uncertainty in model predictions. Bootstrap resampling of the pre-generated POD distribution was used to derive point-estimates and 95% confidence intervals for each POD prediction. Enrichment analysis to evaluate the accuracy of PODQSAR showed that 80% of the 5% most potent chemicals were found in the top 20% of the most potent chemical predictions, suggesting that the repeat dose POD QSAR models presented here may help inform screening level human health risk assessments in the absence of other data.

Dataset Information

Toxicity Rank Order (TRO) As a New Approach for Toxicity Prediction by QSAR Models.

Publications

Toxicity Rank Order (TRO) As a New Approach for Toxicity Prediction by QSAR Models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets