Leukocyte-Rich vs. Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Gupta A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9856144 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Leukocyte-Rich vs. Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.
Gupta Ashim A Jeyaraman Madhan M Potty Anish G AG
Biomedicines 20230106 1
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a well-established form of OA and accounts for nearly 4/5 of global OA burden […]. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Osteoarthritis (OA) is a tremendously widespread joint ailment, typically affecting large weight-bearing joints and influencing over 30 million individuals in the United States, with the anticipated number of patients to reach 67 million by 2030 [...].
| S-EPMC9599679 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo use T1ρ and T2 magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the effect of leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP) injections on knee cartilage health and to correlate structural changes with patient-reported outcome measurements.MethodsTen patients with symptomatic unilateral mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 1-2) underwent T1ρ and T2 magnetic resonance imaging of both the symptomatic and contralateral knee before injection and 6 months after injection with LP-PRP. Patient-reported outcome questionnaires (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee) that evaluate the domains of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports function, and quality of life were completed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after injection. T1ρ and T2 relaxation times, which are correlated with the proteoglycan and collagen concentration of cartilage, were measured in compartments with and without chondral lesions.ResultsTen patients were prospectively enrolled (9 female, 1 male) with a mean age of 52.9 years (range, 42-68) years and mean body mass index of 23.2 ± 1.9. Significant increases in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for all subscales and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were observed 3 months after injection and the improvements were sustained at 12 months. T1ρ and T2 values of compartments with chondral lesions were observed to significantly decrease by 6.0% (P = .036) and 7.1% (P = .017) 6 months after LP-PRP injection, respectively. No significant associations between T1ρ and T2 relaxation times and improvement in patient-reported outcomes were observed.ConclusionsPatients undergoing LP-PRP injections for the treatment of mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis had increased proteoglycan and collagen deposition in the cartilage of affected compartments by 6 months after injection. Patient-reported outcomes scores improved 3 months after injection and were sustained through 1 year after injection, but these improvements were not associated with the changes in proteoglycan and collagen deposition in knee cartilage.Level of evidenceLevel II, prospective cohort study.
| S-EPMC10300591 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injections in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (KOA). An autologous blood product containing a high percentage of various growth factors (GFs), cytokines and modulating factors as PRP has shown promising results in achieving this goal. Methods: One hundred and fifty-three patients (72 males, mean age 59.06 ± 8.78, range 40−81 years old) from January 2018 to January 2020 received three consecutive PRP injections and completed the follow ups. Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Knee society score (KSS) and Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were evaluated before PRP injection (T0), one month (T1), three months (T2) and six months (T3) after the treatment. All patients underwent baseline and at 6 months MRI and X-ray evaluation. Results: A statistically significant VAS, KSS and WOMAC reduction emerged in the comparison between evaluations (p < 0.05), MRI demonstrated non-statistically significant improvement in cartilage thickness for both tibial plate and femoral plate (p = 0.46 and p = 0.33 respectively), and no radiographic changes could be seen in any patients. Conclusions: PRP injection represents a valid conservative treatment to reduce pain, improve quality of life and functional scores even at midterm of 6 months follow-up.
| S-EPMC9099616 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAn umbrella review of meta-analyses was conducted to evaluate the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in arthroscopic surgeries of rotator cuff injury. The effectiveness of leukocyte-poor PRP and leukocyte-rich PRP in the treatment of rotator cuff surgery was also compared.MethodsWeb of Science, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2024. Literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction were performed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Jadad decision algorithm was used to ascertain which meta-analysis represented the best evidence.ResultsA total of 11 meta-analyses with evidence level ranging from level 1 to 2 were included in this umbrella review. Leukocyte-poor PRP was effective in reducing rotator cuff retear rates, alleviating pain, and increasing Constant scores compared with non-PRP treatments. However, it did not show improvement on the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) compared with the non-PRP treatment group. Meanwhile, the leukocyte-rich PRP group improved the SST but showed no different results when compared with the non-PRP treatment group.ConclusionCompared with no use of PRP, leukocyte-poor PRP was able to alleviate postoperative pain, reduce the retear rate, and improve the postoperative Constant score. Leukocyte-rich PRP could effectively enhance postoperative SST outcomes, leading to improvement of patient satisfaction and quality of life. Future researches should prioritize long-term follow-up studies and evaluate the durability of these results.
| S-EPMC11502652 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We describe a new technique of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infiltration for the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. PRP intra-articular infiltration is a promising treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but it still has some limitations in high-degree osteoarthritis. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis is based on clinical and radiographic findings, and patients with grade III or IV knee tibiofemoral osteoarthritis based on the Ahlbäck scale are considered candidates for this technique. The technique consists of performing intraosseous infiltration of PRP into the subchondral bone, which acts on this tissue and consequently on cartilage-bone communication. Although the intraosseous injection hinders the conventional knee intra-articular infiltration, it allows an extension of the range of action of the PRP, which acts directly on the subchondral bone, which is involved in the progression of osteoarthritis. Thus this technique involves a new administration of PRP that can delay knee arthroplasty; moreover, it can be applied for not only severe osteoarthritis but also other pathologies in which the subchondral bone is critical in the etiology, such as necrosis and osteochondral lesions.
| S-EPMC4314556 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disease, particularly affecting the knees. This condition is often managed through various treatments, including intra-articular injections such as corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP has shown promising outcomes in recent studies although it does lack strong endorsement in some clinical guidelines due to inconsistent results and lack of standardized results. This study was conducted to assess patient awareness and the frequency of PRP offered for the treatment of knee OA, compared to CS and HA. In a cross-sectional study, 46 knee OA patients were surveyed regarding their knowledge and experiences of CS, HA, and PRP injections. The questionnaires were administered between September 2022 and February 2023. Additionally, the study evaluated the severity of patients knee OA, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and gathered demographic information from the participants. CS injections were offered to 93.5%, and 100% of participants had previously heard of this type of injection. HA injections were offered to 37%, and 65.9% of participants had heard of them. PRP was offered to 2%, and 6.5% had ever heard of it. This study underscores the limited awareness and utilization of PRP among knee OA patients. Patients and physicians need to be more informed of all of the treatment options available for knee OA, especially orthobiologics such as PRP. Future research in larger, diverse populations is needed.
| S-EPMC10798754 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pressure ulcer (PU) is a common type of chronic wound that is difficult to treat. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is rich in cytokines and growth factors, and it can be divided into two categories according to its leukocyte content: leukocyte-poor PRP (P-PRP) and leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP). PRP has been applied in a variety of wound treatments, due to its strong ability to promote repair. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of PRP on PU and elucidate the role of leukocytes in the treatment process. Sprague-Dawley rats were used to establish PU models of ischemia-reperfusion injury by applying magnets externally. L-PRP, P-PRP, and saline were injected into the dermal wounds. Wound healing analysis and sampling were performed on days 3, 7, 11, and 15 after treatment. Histological examinations, real-time PCR, immunohistochemical examinations, and biomechanical assay were carried out on the wound samples. The PRP groups exhibited greater wound inflammatory response than the control group in the early stage but the response reduced rapidly as the wound healed. On days 7, 11, and 15, the PRP groups also yielded better wound healing rates and histological outcomes than the control group, with superior biomechanical properties observed on day 15. Among both PRP groups, the L-PRP group attained a higher wound healing rate than the P-PRP group on day 7, with greater significant early inflammatory responses, and more prominent angiogenesis. Therefore, PRP is proven to accelerate the healing of PU, with L-PRP being more effective in regulating inflammation and promoting angiogenesis than P-PRP.
| S-EPMC10321391 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection compared with hyaluronic acid (HA) injection for patients undergoing knee osteoarthritis.MethodsWe systematically searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on January 23, 2020 to identify relevant studies issued in English languages. The outcomes evaluating the efficacy of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatment were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (WOMAC pain, function, stiffness, and total scores) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lequesne Index score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, EQ-VAS scores, and KOOS scores. The pooled data were analyzed by Stata 12.0.ResultsA total of 20 RCTs were enrolled in the present meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection reduced pain more effectively than hyaluronic acid (HA) injection at 6-month and 12-month follow-up evaluated by WOMAC pain scores and VAS scores. EQ-VAS in the patients treated with PRP injection was lower than that in patients with HA injection at 12 months. Moreover, the patients with PRP injection had a better function recovery than those with HA injection at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up, as evaluated by WOMAC function scores. WOMAC total scores showed significant difference at 6-month and 12-month follow-up. The IKDC scores indicated PRP injection was significantly more effective than HA injection at 3 months and 6 months. However, the Lequesne Index scores, KOOS scores, and adverse events did not show any significant difference between groups.ConclusionIntra-articular PRP injection appeared to be more efficacious than HA injection for the treatment of KOA in terms of short-term functional recovery. Moreover, PRP injection was superior to HA injection in terms of long-term pain relief and function improvement. In addition, PRP injection did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to HA injection.
| S-EPMC7488405 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6349675 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: In the last decade, regenerative therapies have become one of the leading disease modifying options for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Still, there is a lack of trials with a direct comparison of different biological treatments. Our aim was to directly compare clinical outcomes of knee injections of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC), Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP), or Hyaluronic acid (HA) in the OA treatment. Methods: Patients with knee pain and osteoarthritis KL grade II to IV were randomized to receive a BMAC, PRP, and HA injection in the knee. VAS, WOMAC, KOOS, and IKDC scores were used to establish baseline values at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. All side effects were reported. Results: A total of 175 patients with a knee osteoarthritis KL grade II-IV were randomized; 111 were treated with BMAC injection, 30 with HA injection, and 34 patients with PRP injection. There were no differences between these groups when considering KL grade, BMI, age, or gender. There were no serious side effects. The mean VAS scores after 3, 7, 14, and 21 days showed significant differences between groups with a drop of VAS in all groups but with a difference in the BMAC group in comparison to other groups (p < 0.001). There were high statistically significant differences between baseline scores and those after 12 months (p < 0.001) in WOMAC, KOOS, KOOS pain, and IKDC scores, and in addition, there were differences between these scores in the BMAC group in comparison with other groups, except for the PRP group in WOMAC and the partial IKDC score. There were no differences between the HA and PRP groups, although PRP showed a higher level of clinical improvement. Conclusions: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate, Leukocyte rich Platelet Rich Plasma, and Hyaluronic acid injections are safe therapeutic options for knee OA and provide positive clinical outcomes after 12 months in comparison with findings preceding the intervention. BMAC could be better in terms of clinical improvements in the treatment of knee OA than PRP and HA up to 12 months. PRP provides better outcomes than HA during the observation period, but these results are not statistically significant. More randomized controlled trials and high quality comparative studies are needed for direct correlative conclusions.
| S-EPMC8623697 | biostudies-literature