Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Continued non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.


ABSTRACT:

Background

One-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC).

Aims

We aimed to investigate whether continued non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy compared with continued vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy during TAVI is equally safe and effective.  Methods: Consecutive patients on OAC with either NOAC or VKA undergoing transfemoral TAVI at five European centres were enrolled. The primary outcome measure was a composite of major/life-threatening bleeding, stroke, and all-cause mortality at 30 days.

Results

In total, 584 patients underwent TAVI under continued OAC with 294 (50.3%) patients receiving VKA and 290 (49.7%) patients receiving NOAC. At 30 days, the composite primary outcome had occurred in 51 (17.3%) versus 36 (12.4%) patients with continued VKA and with continued NOAC, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-1.07; p=0.092). Rates of major/life-threatening bleeding (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.52-1.47; p=0.606) and stroke (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.29-3.59; p=0.974) were not different between groups. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, continued NOAC, compared with continued VKA, was associated with a lower risk for all-cause 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37-0.98; p=0.043). The analysis of the propensity score-matched cohort revealed similar results.

Conclusions

Continued NOAC compared with continued VKA during TAVI led to comparable outcomes with regard to the composite outcome measure indicating that continued OAC with both drugs is feasible. These hypothesis-generating results need to be confirmed by a dedicated randomised controlled trial.

SUBMITTER: Mangner N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9909456 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Continued non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Mangner Norman N   Brinkert Miriam M   Keller Lukas S LS   Moriyama Noriaki N   Hagemeyer Daniel D   Haussig Stephan S   Crusius Lisa L   Kobza Richard R   Abdel-Wahab Mohamed M   Laine Mika M   Stortecky Stefan S   Pilgrim Thomas T   Nietlispach Fabian F   Ruschitzka Frank F   Thiele Holger H   Toggweiler Stefan S   Linke Axel A  

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 20230206 13


<h4>Background</h4>One-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC).<h4>Aims</h4>We aimed to investigate whether continued non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy compared with continued vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy during TAVI is equally safe and effective.  Methods: Consecutive patients on OAC with either NOAC or VKA undergoing transfemoral TAVI at five European centres were enro  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9019885 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9950606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11267358 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8600552 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7890286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9390526 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6242924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11751777 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4987420 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5639230 | biostudies-literature