Dataset Information

Effects of Tumor Localization, Age, and Stage on the Outcomes of Gastric and Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas.

ABSTRACT: Signet ring cell adenocarcinomas (SRCCs) are a rare histological adenocarcinoma subtype, classically thought to have a worse prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The majority of these cancers occur in the stomach, colon, and rectum. Their rarity means that most epidemiological studies into their pathology are often underpowered, and interpretations from these reports are mixed. In this study, we use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database to examine the effects of tumor localization, age, and stage on gastric and colorectal cancer outcomes. For early onset localized and regional gastric cancers, SRCCs have the same overall risk of mortality compared to conventional adenocarcinomas. Over the age of 50 years, SRCCs have worse outcomes across all stages. Gastric SRCCs are 2-3-fold more likely in younger patients, and more heavily favor the distal stomach. Like conventional adenocarcinomas, proximal gastric SRCCs have decreased survival. Across all ages, stages, and locations, colorectal SRCCs have worse outcomes. SRCCs favor the right colon, but outcomes are significantly worse for the left colon and rectal cancers. Relative to adenocarcinomas, colorectal SRCCs have the worst outcomes in younger patients. Overall, these results provide insights into SRCC disease patterns that cannot be surmised outside of population-level data.

SUBMITTER: Benesch MGK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9913295 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of Tumor Localization, Age, and Stage on the Outcomes of Gastric and Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas.

Benesch Matthew G K MGK Mathieson Alexander A O'Brien Shalana B L SBL

Cancers 20230124 3

Signet ring cell adenocarcinomas (SRCCs) are a rare histological adenocarcinoma subtype, classically thought to have a worse prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The majority of these cancers occur in the stomach, colon, and rectum. Their rarity means that most epidemiological studies into their pathology are often underpowered, and interpretations from these reports are mixed. In this study, we use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database to examine the ef ...[more]

PMID: 36765680

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSurgery alone is standard-of-care for stage I gastric adenocarcinoma; however, clinicians can offer preoperative therapy for clinical stage I disease with signet ring cell histology, given its presumed aggressive biology. We aimed to assess the validity of this practice.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was reviewed for patients with clinical stage I signet ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment with surgery alone, perioperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant therapy, or adjuvant therapy. Analysis was stratified by preoperative clinical/pathologic stage. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).ResultsOf 1018 patients, median age was 60 years (±14); 53% received surgery alone (n = 542), 5% received perioperative chemotherapy (n = 47), 12% received neoadjuvant therapy (n = 125), and 30% received adjuvant therapy (n = 304). For clinical stage I disease, surgery alone was associated with an improved 5-year OS rate (71%) versus perioperative chemotherapy (58%), neoadjuvant therapy (38%), or adjuvant therapy (52%) [overall p < 0.01]. For pathologic stage I, surgery alone had equivalent or improved survival compared with perioperative, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant therapy (5-year OS: 78% vs. 89% [p = 0.77] vs. 64% [p = 0.04] vs. 84% [p = 0.99]). Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS compared with pretreatment for those patients upstaged (37%) to pathologic stage II/III (55% vs. 36% and 34% vs. 7%; all p < 0.01).ConclusionsThis stage-specific study demonstrates improved survival with surgery alone for clinical stage I signet ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma. Despite 37% of clinical stage I patients being upstaged to pathologic stage II/III, adjuvant therapy offers a favorable rescue strategy, with improved outcomes compared with those treated preoperatively. Surgery alone also affords similar or improved survival for pathologic stage I disease versus multimodality therapy. This study challenges the bias to overtreat stage I signet ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma.

Project description:BackgroundA national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme was launched in 2002 in Germany. A comprehensive evaluation of the programme effectiveness using real-world data is still lacking. In addition, there are regional reports on increasing colorectal cancer incidence in younger populations. Therefore, we aimed to describe and compare the overall, age- and stage-specific incidence trends for colorectal, colon and rectal cancer.MethodsWe used data from seven population-based cancer registries in Germany. We report absolute and relative changes in incidence rates between the early screening phase (2003-2005) and the most recent time period available (2015-2017), as well as annual percent changes. We analysed incidences according to tumour site (colorectum, colon, and rectum) and to six age groups (young adults: 15-34, 35-39, 40-49, screening-entitled/older adults: 50-54, 55-69 and 70 + years old).ResultsIn our sample of 271,011 colorectal adenocarcinomas, about two-thirds were located in the colon and 95% of them occurred in the age group 50+ (50-54: 5%, 55-69: 32.8%, 70+: 57.2%). For the time period 2003-2005 the age-specific incidence rates of individuals in the age group 55-69 were about 76/100,00 for colon and 54/100,000 for rectal cancer (age group 70 + colon: 179/100,000; rectum: 84/100,000). The incidence rates in young adults were less than 13% of that of individuals in the age group 55-69 (< 5% of individuals aged 70+; <33% of individuals aged 50-54). Over time, incidence decreased in individuals at the age of 55+, for all subsites considered as well as for early and late stage cancers (with few exceptions), while incidence of young adult CRC (both early and late stage) increased steepest in the youngest age groups. For late stage rectal cancer, a shift was observed in all age groups from UICC stage IV to stage III being the most frequent stage.ConclusionsSix years after the introduction of the national colonoscopy screening program, late stage CRC incidence began to decline substantially in the screening-eligible age groups (55-69, 70+). It is likely that this decline and the increase in early stage CRC observed in younger age groups can be attributed to the program. Long lasting public awareness campaigns for CRC screening might have led to opportunistic screening in younger adults. Whether these benefits outweigh the possible harm of screening in younger age groups remains unclear.

Dataset Information

Effects of Tumor Localization, Age, and Stage on the Outcomes of Gastric and Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas.

Publications

Effects of Tumor Localization, Age, and Stage on the Outcomes of Gastric and Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets