Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduce mortality risk during post-acute COVID-19 phase.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wan EYF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9943556 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduce mortality risk during post-acute COVID-19 phase.
Wan Eric Yuk Fai EYF Wang Boyuan B Mathur Sukriti S Chan Cheyenne I Ying CIY Yan Vincent Ka Chun VKC Lai Francisco Tsz Tsun FTT Chui Celine Sze Ling CSL Li Xue X Wong Carlos King Ho CKH Li Philip Hei PH Lau Chak Sing CS Wong Ian Chi Kei ICK Chan Esther Wai Yin EWY
The Journal of infection 20230222 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:Limited studies compared the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir against a control group on post-COVID-19 conditions. Our study examined the association of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir with post-acute mortality and hospitalizations among outpatients using real-world outpatient records of COVID-19 designated clinics in Hong Kong. This is an observational study using a target trial emulation framework, involving nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus no antiviral treatment (Trial 1) and molnupiravir versus no antiviral treatment (Trial 2). Outcomes included post-acute mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and hospitalization due to 13 selected sequelae. Relative effectiveness was assessed by comparing the cumulative incidence between two groups, reported as relative risk (RR), along with risk differences (RD) during day 0-30, 31-180, and 181-360. After screening, 140,477 and 96,030 patients were included in Trial 1 and 2, respectively. Compared with no treatment, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-treated patients exhibited a significantly lower risk of post-acute mortality (31-180 days: RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96; RD, 0.20%; 181-360 days: RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.82; RD, 0.32%) and all-cause hospitalization (31-180 days: RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88; RD, 1.11%; 181-360 days: RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.89; RD, 1.18%). Patients receiving molnupiravir had a lower risk of 30-day mortality, but no significant beneficial effect was observed for the post-acute outcomes. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in reducing post-COVID-19 outcomes among outpatients. While we observed the short-term effectiveness of molnupiravir in reducing mortality, no protective effect on long-term post-COVID-19 outcomes was observed.
| S-EPMC11881657 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged to cause pandemic respiratory disease in the past 2 years, leading to significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. At the beginning of the pandemic, only nonspecific treatments were available, but recently two oral antivirals have received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Molnupiravir targets the viral polymerase and causes lethal mutations within the virus during replication. Nirmatrelvir targets SARS-CoV-2's main protease, and it is combined with ritonavir to delay its metabolism and allow nirmatrelvir to inhibit proteolytic cleavage of viral polyproteins during replication, preventing efficient virus production. Both drugs inhibit in vitro viral replication of all variants tested to date. Each is taken orally twice daily for 5 days. When started in the first 5 days of illness in persons at risk for complications due to COVID-19, molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir significantly decreased severe outcomes (hospitalizations and death) with adjusted relative risk reductions of 30% and 88%, respectively, for the two treatments. Molnupiravir should not be used in children or pregnant persons due to concerns about potential toxicity, and reliable contraception should be used in persons of childbearing potential. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may cause significant drug-to-drug interactions that limit its use in persons taking certain medications metabolized by certain cytochrome P450 enzymes. Both treatment regimens are important additions to the management of early COVID-19 in at-risk patients in the outpatient setting.
| S-EPMC9380556 | biostudies-literature
Project description:While previous research examined coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antiviral-vaccine interactions through exploratory subgroup analysis, none specifically designed for examining this interaction or its impact on post-acute outcomes. This study examined the interaction between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and complete COVID-19 vaccination on reducing the risk of post-acute outcomes among COVID-19 patients. We followed COVID-19 patients hospitalized between 11 March 2022 and 10 October 2023, until 31 October 2023 in Hong Kong. Exposure groups were based on nirmatrelvir-ritonavir usage and vaccination status (fully or not fully vaccinated). Post-acute death and all-cause rehospitalization were the study outcomes. Propensity score weighting was applied to balance covariates among exposure groups, including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and concomitant treatments. Multiplicative and additive interactions between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and vaccination status were assessed. A total of 50,438 COVID-19 patients were included in this study and arranged into four exposure groups. Significant additive interaction on post-acute rehospitalization was observed (relative excess risk, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.19; p-value, 0.018; attributable proportion, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.12; p-value, 0.017; synergy index, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.55; p-value, 0.032). The interaction on post-acute mortality was marginally significant. In the subgroup analysis, the interaction effect is more pronounced in older adults, female, and CoronaVac recipients. In conclusion, our study demonstrated an additive interaction between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and complete vaccination on post-acute outcomes, suggesting greater long-term benefits of the antiviral for fully vaccinated individuals compared to not fully vaccinated patients.
| S-EPMC11539398 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10594174 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8900806 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The clinical characteristics of the rebound phenomenon after antiviral therapy in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) are largely unknown. There are few data comparing the rebound phenomenon after molnupiravir therapy to that after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir therapy. We investigated the incidence and risk factors associated with COVID-19 rebound after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir therapy during the Omicron era. This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir. We conducted weekly questionnaires of symptom scores from day 0 to day 28, with an additional day when patients experienced reappearing symptoms. We defined COVID-19 rebound as when patients experienced a 50% increase in symptom scores compared to the lowest symptom score between days 0 and 14. Among the 150 patients, 93 (62%) and 57 (38%) received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir therapy and molnupiravir, respectively. Of these, 11 patients (7.3%; 95% CI, 3.1-11.5) experienced COVID-19 rebound. The median duration from antiviral therapy to rebound was 12 days. Patients with clinical rebound had a higher symptom score at antiviral therapy initiation than those without (median, 5 vs 4; P = .02). There was no significant difference in the clinical rebounds associated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir therapy (5.4% vs 10.5%; P = .39). Approximately one-tenth of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received antiviral therapy experienced rebound phenomena after treatment. Regardless of antiviral therapy type, high initial symptom scores were associated with a more frequent rebound phenomenon.
| S-EPMC10545339 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWhether hospitalized patients benefit from COVID-19 oral antivirals is uncertain.ObjectiveTo examine the real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the Omicron outbreak.DesignTarget trial emulation study.SettingElectronic health databases in Hong Kong.ParticipantsThe molnupiravir emulated trial included hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged 18 years or older between 26 February and 18 July 2022 (n = 16 495). The nirmatrelvir-ritonavir emulated trial included hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged 18 years or older between 16 March and 18 July 2022 (n = 7119).InterventionInitiation of molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 5 days of hospitalization with COVID-19 versus no initiation of molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.MeasurementsEffectiveness against all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or use of ventilatory support within 28 days.ResultsThe use of oral antivirals in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality (molnupiravir: hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93]; nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: HR, 0.77 [CI, 0.66 to 0.90]) but no significant risk reduction in terms of ICU admission (molnupiravir: HR, 1.02 [CI, 0.76 to 1.36]; nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: HR, 1.08 [CI, 0.58 to 2.02]) or the need for ventilatory support (molnupiravir: HR, 1.07 [CI, 0.89 to 1.30]; nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.70 to 1.52]). There was no significant interaction between drug treatment and the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received, thereby supporting the effectiveness of oral antivirals regardless of vaccination status. No significant interaction between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment and age, sex, or Charlson Comorbidity Index was observed, whereas molnupiravir tended to be more effective in older people.LimitationThe outcome of ICU admission or need for ventilatory support may not capture all severe COVID-19 cases; unmeasured confounders, such as obesity and health behaviors, may exist.ConclusionMolnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduced all-cause mortality in both vaccinated and unvaccinated hospitalized patients. No significant reduction in ICU admission or the need for ventilatory support was observed.Primary funding sourceHealth and Medical Research Fund Research on COVID-19, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Research Grants Council, Collaborative Research Fund; and Health Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| S-EPMC10052319 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundUsing a retrospective cohort study design, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were highly vulnerable.MethodsThe impact of each drug was determined via comparisons with age-matched control groups of patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 who did not receive oral antiviral therapy.ResultsAdministration of molnupiravir significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; P < .001) and death (OR, 0.31; P < .001) among these patients based on data adjusted for age, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination status, and time elapsed since the most recent vaccination. The reductions in risk were most profound among elderly patients (≥75 years old) and among those with high levels of drug adherence. Administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir also resulted in significant reductions in the risk of hospitalization (OR, 0.31; P < .001) and death (OR, 0.28; P < .001). Similar to molnupiravir, the impact of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was more substantial among elderly patients and in those with high levels of drug adherence.ConclusionsCollectively, these real-world findings suggest that although the risks of hospitalization and death due to COVID-19 have been reduced, antivirals can provide additional benefits to members of highly vulnerable patient populations.
| S-EPMC10733724 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceOlder patients living in nursing homes are at very high risk of mortality after getting COVID-19.ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes following oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 among nonhospitalized older patients living in nursing homes.Design, setting, and participantsThis is a territory-wide, retrospective cohort study conducted between February 16 and March 31, 2022, with the last follow-up date on April 25, 2022. Participants were patients with COVID-19 living in nursing homes in Hong Kong. Data analysis was performed from May to June 2022.ExposuresMolnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, or no oral antiviral treatment.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was hospitalization for COVID-19, and the secondary outcome was risk of inpatient disease progression (ie, admission to intensive care unit, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, and/or death).ResultsOf 14 617 patients (mean [SD] age, 84.8 [10.2] years; 8222 women [56.2%]), 8939 (61.2%) did not use oral antivirals, 5195 (35.5%) used molnupiravir, and 483 (3.3%) used nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Compared with patients who did not use oral antivirals, those who used molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were more likely to be female and less likely to have comorbid illnesses and hospitalization in the past year. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 30 (30-30) days, 6223 patients (42.6%) were hospitalized and 2307 patients (15.8%) experienced inpatient disease progression. After propensity score weighting, both molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization (molnupiravir, weighted hazard ratio [wHR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57; P < .001; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, wHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.65; P < .001) and inpatient disease progression (molnupiravir, wHR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.23-0.51; P < .001; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, wHR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.44; P < .001). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was comparable to molnupiravir in achieving better clinical outcomes (hospitalization, wHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75-1.33; P = .99; inpatient disease progression, wHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.20-1.20; P = .12).Conclusions and relevanceIn this retrospective cohort study, the use of oral antivirals to treat COVID-19 was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization and inpatient disease progression among patients living in nursing homes. The findings of this study of nursing home residents could be reasonably extrapolated to other frail older patients living in the community.
| S-EPMC10140804 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend using nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment, but its potential drug interactions and contraindications limit its applicability in certain categories of patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in managing COVID-19 among hospitalized patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and did not require baseline supplemental oxygen from February 2022 to January 2023. We compared the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir with a focus on disease progression.ResultsThe study included 401 high-risk, hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. No significant difference was found in disease progression, the composite outcome of disease progression (4.0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.782), and O2 supplementation via nasal prong (21.8% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.115) between the patients treated with molnupiravir and those treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. This finding was similar after 1:1 propensity-score matching. In the multivariate analysis, molnupiravir treatment was not significantly associated with progression to severe disease.ConclusionIn conclusion, our findings suggest that similar to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, molnupiravir has a distinct potential role in COVID-19 treatment, transcending its current perceived status as only a secondary option.
| S-EPMC10876432 | biostudies-literature