Dataset Information

Comparison between Phenobarbitone and Levetiracetam as the initial anticonvulsant in preterm neonatal seizures - a pilot randomized control trial in developing country setup.

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous Levetiracetam and Phenobarbitone in the treatment of seizures in preterm neonates. It was an open-labeled, parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, India. Total 48 preterm neonates (28-36⁺⁶ weeks) with clinical seizures were randomized to receive either Levetiracetam (LEV; 40 mg/kg, then 20 mg/kg) or Phenobarbitone (PB; 15 mg/kg, then 10 mg/kg) intravenously as first loading dose in ratio 1:1; second loading was given for persistent seizure. Efficacy was denoted by cessation of clinical seizures with first or second doses of the allotted antiepileptic, and remaining seizure-free for the next 24 h. The demographic characteristics of preterm neonates and seizure types were comparable between both groups. Clinical seizure was controlled in 19 (79%) neonates in LEV group and 17 (70%) neonates in PB group, RR 1.12 (95% CI: 0.80 to 1.55), p = 0.504. There was increased respiratory support in PB group 9 (38%) vs. 3 (13%) in LEV group, RR 3.0 (95% CI: 0.92 to 9.74), p = 0.06. Conclusion: Levetiracetam and Phenobarbitone were equally efficacious for clinical neonatal seizure control, but increased respiratory support was found with Phenobarbitone use. What is Known: • Preterm neonates are at higher risk of neonatal seizure and Phenobarbitone is commonly used as the first line antiepileptic drugs in treating them. What is New: • Levetiracetam found equally efficacious as Phenobarbitone for cessation of clinical seizures in preterm neonates, with less adverse effect.

SUBMITTER: Gyandeep G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9950002 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison between Phenobarbitone and Levetiracetam as the initial anticonvulsant in preterm neonatal seizures - a pilot randomized control trial in developing country setup.

Gyandeep Gummalla G Behura Sushree Smita SS Sahu Sanjay Kumar SK Panda Santosh Kumar SK

European journal of pediatrics 20230224 5

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous Levetiracetam and Phenobarbitone in the treatment of seizures in preterm neonates. It was an open-labeled, parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, India. Total 48 preterm neonates (28-36<sup>+6</sup> weeks) with clinical seizures were randomized to receive either Levetiracetam (LEV; 40 mg/kg, then 20 mg/kg) or Phenobarbitone (PB; 15 mg/kg, then 10 mg/kg) intravenously as first lo ...[more]

PMID: 36823477

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Neonatal seizures are a common neurological emergency in newborns. Phenobarbital (PB) is the first-line antiepileptic drug (AED). However, PB has some side effects, such as hypotension and respiratory depression, and it can accelerate neuronal apoptosis in the immature brain. Levetiracetam (LEV), a new antiepileptic drug, has been used as a second-line drug for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Compared with PB, LEV has many advantages, including a low incidence of side effects and better neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, there are only a few systematic reviews of LEV for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEV for neonatal seizures and to compare the efficacy, side effects, and neurological outcomes between LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures. Methods: The keywords LEV, PB, and neonatal seizure were searched in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases with a last update in July 2021 to collect high-quality studies. We collected studies studying the efficacy or safety of LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were extracted and outcome measures, including efficacy, side effect rate, neurological score, and mortality rate, were analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Ten articles were finally included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in efficacy between LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures. Compared with PB, the incidence of side effects of LEV was lower. The incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression in the LEV group was significantly lower than that in the PB group. In terms of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, there was no significant difference in the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) scores between LEV and PB. Conclusion: PB is still the first-line AED recommended by the WHO for the treatment of neonatal seizures. The new AEDs LEV may not have better efficacy than PB. At the same time, LEV is associated with better neurodevelopment outcomes and a lower risk of adverse effects. In addition, continuous EEG monitoring should be used to diagnose neonatal seizures to evaluate the severity of the seizures, remission, and drug efficacy. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021279029.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough levetiracetam and phenytoin are widely used antiseizure medications (ASM) in neonates, their efficacy on seizure freedom is unclear. We evaluated electroencephalographic (EEG) seizure freedom following sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital.MethodsWe recruited neonates born ≥35 weeks and aged <72 h who had continued electrographic seizures despite phenobarbital, from three Indian hospitals, between 20 June 2020 and 31 July 2022. The neonates were treated with intravenous levetiracetam (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, second line) followed by phenytoin (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, third line) if seizures persisted. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom, defined as an absence of seizures on EEG for at least 60 min within 40 min from the start of infusion.FindingsOf the 206 neonates with continued seizures despite phenobarbital, 152 received levetiracetam with EEG. Of these one EEG was missing, 47 (31.1%) were in status epilepticus, and primary outcome data were available in 145. Seizure freedom occurred in 20 (13.8%; 95% CI 8.6%-20.5%) after levetiracetam; 16 (80.0%) responded to the first dose and 4 (20.0%) to the second dose. Of the 125 neonates with persisting seizures after levetiracetam, 114 received phenytoin under EEG monitoring. Of these, the primary outcome data were available in 104. Seizure freedom occurred in 59 (56.7%; 95% CI 46.7%-66.4%) neonates; 54 (91.5%) responded to the first dose and 5 (8.5%) to the second dose.InterpretationWith the conventional doses, levetiracetam was associated with immediate EEG seizure cessation in only 14% of phenobarbital unresponsive neonatal seizures. Additional treatment with phenytoin along with levetiracetam attained seizure freedom in further 57%. Safety and efficacy of higher doses of levetiracetam should be evaluated in well-designed randomised controlled trials.FundingNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research and Innovation for Global Health Transformation (NIHR200144).

Project description:ObjectiveIn the absence of controlled trials, treatment of neonatal seizures has changed minimally despite poor drug efficacy. We tested bumetanide added to phenobarbital to treat neonatal seizures in the first trial to include a standard-therapy control group.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation design was employed. Neonates with postmenstrual age 33 to 44 weeks at risk of or with seizures were eligible. Subjects with electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed seizures after ≥20 and <40mg/kg phenobarbital were randomized to receive additional phenobarbital with either placebo (control) or 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3mg/kg bumetanide (treatment). Continuous EEG monitoring data from ≥2 hours before to ≥48 hours after study drug administration (SDA) were analyzed for seizures.ResultsSubjects were randomized to treatment (n = 27) and control (n = 16) groups. Pharmacokinetics were highly variable among subjects and altered by hypothermia. The only statistically significant adverse event was diuresis in treated subjects (48% vs 13%, p = 0.02). One treated (4%) and 3 control subjects died (19%, p = 0.14). Among survivors, 2 of 26 treated subjects (8%) and 0 of 13 control subjects had hearing impairment, as did 1 nonrandomized subject. Total seizure burden varied widely, with much higher seizure burden in treatment versus control groups (median = 3.1 vs 1.2 min/h, p = 0.006). There was significantly greater reduction in seizure burden 0 to 4 hours and 2 to 4 hours post-SDA (both p < 0.01) compared with 2-hour baseline in treatment versus control groups with adjustment for seizure burden.InterpretationAlthough definitive proof of efficacy awaits an appropriately powered phase 3 trial, this randomized, controlled, multicenter trial demonstrated an additional reduction in seizure burden attributable to bumetanide over phenobarbital without increased serious adverse effects. Future trials of bumetanide and other drugs should include a control group and balance seizure severity. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:327-340.

Project description:Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has supported oxygen delivery and carbon dioxide removal in neonatal severe respiratory failure for more than 4 decades. The definition and diagnosis of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was made according to the criteria first established by a Montreux Conference in 2017. By far, there has been no ECMO efficiency studies in neonatal ARDS. We aimed to compare the outcomes of neonates with severe ARDS supported with and without ECMO. Design: Retrospective pair-matched study. Setting: In the present retrospective pair-matched study, the outcomes of severe ARDS with ECMO support and without ECMO support were analyzed and compared. Propensity score matching was conducted. The study subjects were selected from a China Neonatal ECMO (CNECMO) study. In total, five hospitals were included in the CNECMO study. The patients were matched with demographic and clinical data. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-time, ICU stay, hospitalization costs and cranial MRI results. Patients: 145 neonates with severe ARDS (Oxygenation Index, OI ≥16) from 5 hospitals. Interventions: No interventions. Measurements and Main Results: We collected the data of 145 neonates with severe ARDS (Oxygenation Index, OI≥16) from 5 hospitals. Among them, 42 neonates received venoarterial (VA) ECMO support, and the remaining 103 neonates were treated with conventional mechanical ventilation. The mortality of ECMO-supported neonates was not significantly different compared with the ESLO neonatal respiratory-supported from 2012 to 2018 (23.8 vs. 32.5%, p = 0.230). After matching with the propensity score we got 31 pairs. The ECMO-supported neonates had a lower in-hospital mortality (6 of 31, 19.4%) vs. non ECMO-supported patients (18 of 31, 58.1%) (p = 0.002). Hospitalization costs of survivors in ECMO-supported neonates were significantly higher than that of non-ECMO-supported neonates (p < 0.001). There was no difference of ventilator-times (p = 0.206), ICU stay (p = 0.879) and cranial MRI (p = 0.899) between the survivors of ECMO-supported and non-ECMO-supported neonates with ARDS. Conclusions: By far, there has been no ECMO efficiency studies in neonatal ARDS. This study found that ECMO-support have superior outcomes compared with non-ECMO-support in neonates with severe ARDS.

Project description:ContextLocal recurrence is a formidable risk consideration in employing breast conservation for breast cancer. However pathological complete regression (PCR) from chemotherapy has been associated with improved rates of recurrence. Lower PCR rates have been reported from earlier studies and our approach seeks to obtain higher PCR rates utilizing a two pronged approach of surgery and chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo determine success rates in attaining pathologically complete regression for breast conservation in non-metastatic breast cancer cases in a developing country and their clinical outcome.Patients and methodsPatients diagnosed with early stage breast cancers had sequential anthracycline/taxane based neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy administered at three weekly intervals. Following an initial excision, re-excisions were done following three courses of doxorubicin based chemotherapy. Subsequent re-excisions in cases with failed complete pathological regression were repeated following additional three doxorubicin based chemotherapy cycles or at sequel third taxane based cycle. Endpoint was pathologically complete regression as determined on permanent sections.ResultsPatients ages ranged between 27 and 67 years, mean age 43years, SD 10.34 years, N = 20 Initial breast tumour sizes ranged between 0.5 and 9 cm, mean 4.05 cm, SD 2.38. There were three T4, four T3 tumours, seven T2 and six T1 tumours. Clinical axillary lymphadenopathy with pathological involvement was present in 11 cases. Histological diagnosis showed 13 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (65.0%), 2 cases of ductal carcinoma insitu (10.0%), 1 papillary carcinoma (5.0%), 3 cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (15.0%) and non-specific type 1 (5.0%). Immunohistochemistry assessment available in 15 cases was positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors in 10 cases. Two cases (10.0%) exhibited 20% positivity for human epidermal growth factor receptor. Pathological complete regression (PCR) defined as no invasive or insitu tumour residuals in the excised tumour bed, was achieved in the 18 cases assessed. (100%) This was consistent with clinical complete response obtained. It was not determined in 2 cases though clinical complete response was obtained. PCR was determined in ten cases (50.0%) at the first reexcision, second reexcision in 4 cases (20.0%) and third reexcision in 4 cases (20.0%). Mean no of re-excisions 1.67 cm, SD 0.84. Six sequential anthracycline/taxane cycles were administered in 17 cases while three cases received anthracycline based chemotherapy only. Median duration of followup from diagnosis was 48 months ranging between 8 months and 144 months. There were two demises at 48 months and 36 months follow up.ConclusionExtended chemotherapy sessions alongside re-excisions were successful in achieving much enhanced rates of pathologically complete remissions at 100% in this yet early report, thus improving breast conservation rates even for T3 and T4 tumours. Our study reports higher PCR rates.

Dataset Information

Comparison between Phenobarbitone and Levetiracetam as the initial anticonvulsant in preterm neonatal seizures - a pilot randomized control trial in developing country setup.

Publications

Comparison between Phenobarbitone and Levetiracetam as the initial anticonvulsant in preterm neonatal seizures - a pilot randomized control trial in developing country setup.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets