Dataset Information

Do Amino Acid Antiporters Have Asymmetric Substrate Specificity?

ABSTRACT: Amino acid antiporters mediate the 1:1 exchange of groups of amino acids. Whether substrate specificity can be different for the inward and outward facing conformation has not been investigated systematically, although examples of asymmetric transport have been reported. Here we used LC-MS to detect the movement of ¹²C- and ¹³C-labelled amino acid mixtures across the plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing a variety of amino acid antiporters. Differences of substrate specificity between transporter paralogs were readily observed using this method. Our results suggest that antiporters are largely symmetric, equalizing the pools of their substrate amino acids. Exceptions are the antiporters y⁺LAT1 and y⁺LAT2 where neutral amino acids are co-transported with Na⁺ ions, favouring their import. For the antiporters ASCT1 and ASCT2 glycine acted as a selective influx substrate, while proline was a selective influx substrate of ASCT1. These data show that antiporters can display non-canonical modes of transport.

SUBMITTER: Gauthier-Coles G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9953452 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Do Amino Acid Antiporters Have Asymmetric Substrate Specificity?

Gauthier-Coles Gregory G Fairweather Stephen J SJ Bröer Angelika A Bröer Stefan S

Biomolecules 20230206 2

Amino acid antiporters mediate the 1:1 exchange of groups of amino acids. Whether substrate specificity can be different for the inward and outward facing conformation has not been investigated systematically, although examples of asymmetric transport have been reported. Here we used LC-MS to detect the movement of 12C- and 13C-labelled amino acid mixtures across the plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing a variety of amino acid antiporters. Differences ...[more]

PMID: 36830670

Similar Datasets

Project description:Influenza A viruses possess two glycoprotein spikes on the virion surface: hemagglutinin (HA), which binds to oligosaccharides containing terminal sialic acid, and neuraminidase (NA), which removes terminal sialic acid from oligosaccharides. Hence, the interplay between these receptor-binding and receptor-destroying functions assumes major importance in viral replication. In contrast to the well-characterized role of HA in host range restriction of influenza viruses, there is only limited information on the role of NA substrate specificity in viral replication among different animal species. We therefore investigated the substrate specificities of NA for linkages between N-acetyl sialic acid and galactose (NeuAcalpha2-3Gal and NeuAcalpha2-6Gal) and for different molecular species of sialic acids (N-acetyl and N-glycolyl sialic acids) in influenza A viruses isolated from human, avian, and pig hosts. Substrate specificity assays showed that all viruses had similar specificities for NeuAcalpha2-3Gal, while the activities for NeuAcalpha2-6Gal ranged from marginal, as represented by avian and early N2 human viruses, to high (although only one-third the activity for NeuAcalpha2-3Gal), as represented by swine and more recent N2 human viruses. Using site-specific mutagenesis, we identified in the earliest human virus with a detectable increase in NeuAcalpha2-6Gal specificity a change at position 275 (from isoleucine to valine) that enhanced the specificity for this substrate. Valine at position 275 was maintained in all later human viruses as well as swine viruses. A similar examination of N-glycolylneuraminic acid (NeuGc) specificity showed that avian viruses and most human viruses had low to moderate activity for this substrate, with the exception of most human viruses isolated between 1967 and 1969, whose NeuGc specificity was as high as that of swine viruses. The amino acid at position 431 was found to determine the level of NeuGc specificity of NA: lysine conferred high NeuGc specificity, while proline, glutamine, and glutamic acid were associated with lower NeuGc specificity. Both residues 275 and 431 lie close to the enzymatic active site but are not directly involved in the reaction mechanism. This finding suggests that the adaptation of NA to different substrates occurs by a mechanism of amino acid substitutions that subtly alter the conformation of NA in and around the active site to facilitate the binding of different species of sialic acid.

Dataset Information

Do Amino Acid Antiporters Have Asymmetric Substrate Specificity?

Publications

Do Amino Acid Antiporters Have Asymmetric Substrate Specificity?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets