Dataset Information

Understanding the Functional Components of Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

ABSTRACT: Increasing use of technology in medical education has caused concerns to medical teachers pertaining to the quality of digital learning environments. Thus, this review aimed to unearth the functional components of effective technology-enhanced learning environment in the undergraduate medical education context. The revised Arksey and O'Malley protocol was utilized that include identification of research question and relevant studies, selection of studies, data charting and collection, and collating, summarizing, and reporting results after consultation. We discovered nine components with 25 subcomponents of 74 functional elements found to be present in effective online learning environments. The nine components include cognitive enhancement, content curation, digital capability, technological usability, pedagogical practices, learner characteristics, learning facilitator, social representations, and institutional support. There is an interplay between these components, influencing each other in online learning platforms. A technology-enhanced learning in medical education (TELEMEd) model is proposed which can be used as a framework for evaluating online learning environment in medical education.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01747-6.

SUBMITTER: Naeem NI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9972326 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Understanding the Functional Components of Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Naeem Noor-I-Kiran NI Yusoff Muhamad Saiful Bahri MSB Hadie Siti Nurma Hanim SNH Ismail Irwan Mahazir IM Iqbal Haris H

Medical science educator 20230228 2

Increasing use of technology in medical education has caused concerns to medical teachers pertaining to the quality of digital learning environments. Thus, this review aimed to unearth the functional components of effective technology-enhanced learning environment in the undergraduate medical education context. The revised Arksey and O'Malley protocol was utilized that include identification of research question and relevant studies, selection of studies, data charting and collection, and collat ...[more]

PMID: 37251205

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundResidents need to be trained across the boundaries of their own specialty to prepare them for collaborative practice. Intraprofessional learning (i.e. between individuals of different disciplines within the same profession) has received little attention in the postgraduate medical education literature, in contrast to the extensive literature on interprofessional learning between individuals of different professions. To address this gap, we performed a scoping review to investigate what and how residents learn from workplace-related intraprofessional activities, and what factors influence learning.MethodsThe PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct a scoping review of empirical studies on intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education published between 1 January 2000 to 16 April 2020 in Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and Web of Science. This study applied 'best fit' framework-based synthesis to map the existing evidence, using the presage-process-product (3P) model developed by Tynjälä (2013).ResultsFour thousand three hundred thirty records were screened, and 37 articles were included. This review identified influencing (presage) factors that derived from the sociocultural environment, learner and learning context. Studies described that complexity of care can both facilitate and hinder learning. Furthermore, intraprofessional learning is threatened by professional stereotyping and negative perceptions, and awareness of learning opportunities and explicit reflection are critical in intraprofessional workplace learning. Studies described a range of informal and formal intraprofessional activities (process) under the headings of collaboration in clinical practice, rotations or placements, formal educational sessions and simulated workplace training. In general, learners responded well and their attitudes and perceptions improved, learners reported increased knowledge and skills and positive behavioural changes (product). Learning outcomes were reported in the domains of patient-centred care, collaborative attitudes and respect, mutual knowledge and understanding, collaborative decision making, communication, leadership, teamwork and reflexivity.ConclusionsThis review gives insight into the high learning potential of intraprofessional activities. Many of the included studies relied on self-reported perceptions of change, therefore, future research should focus on generating more robust evidence including objectively examined outcome measures. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the factors that influence intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education. Finally, we provide recommendations for enhancing intraprofessional learning in clinical practice.

Project description:ObjectivesOver the last two decades, the number of scoping reviews in core medical education journals has increased by 4200%. Despite this growth, research on scoping reviews provides limited information about their nature, including how they are conducted or why medical educators undertake this knowledge synthesis type. This gap makes it difficult to know where the field stands and may hamper attempts to improve the conduct, reporting and utility of scoping reviews. Thus, this review characterises the nature of medical education scoping reviews to identify areas for improvement and highlight future research opportunities.MethodThe authors searched PubMed for scoping reviews published between 1/1999 and 4/2020 in 14 medical education journals. The authors extracted and summarised key bibliometric data, the rationales given for conducting a scoping review, the research questions and key reporting elements as described in the PRISMA-ScR. Rationales and research questions were mapped to Arksey and O'Malley's reasons for conducting a scoping review.ResultsOne hundred and one scoping reviews were included. On average, 10.1 scoping reviews (SD = 13.1, median = 4) were published annually with the most reviews published in 2019 (n = 42). Authors described multiple reasons for undertaking scoping reviews; the most prevalent being to summarise and disseminate research findings (n = 77). In 11 reviews, the rationales for the scoping review and the research questions aligned. No review addressed all elements of the PRISMA-ScR, with few authors publishing a protocol (n = 2) or including stakeholders (n = 20). Authors identified shortcomings of scoping reviews, including lack of critical appraisal.ConclusionsScoping reviews are increasingly conducted in medical education and published by most core journals. Scoping reviews aim to map the depth and breadth of emerging topics; as such, they have the potential to play a critical role in the practice, policy and research of medical education. However, these results suggest improvements are needed for this role to be fully realised.

Dataset Information

Understanding the Functional Components of Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Supplementary information

Publications

Understanding the Functional Components of Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets