Dataset Information

Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus immunotherapy versus paclitaxel plus immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This study aimed to compare the feasibility of nab-paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy (nabTP) versus paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy (TP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a neoadjuvant modality for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Between April 2019 and March 2022, we identified ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with both nabTP (n = 213) and TP (n = 98) at our institution and Henan Cancer Hospital. The patients in the ICIs-nabTP and ICIs-TP groups were pair-matched (1:1) for tumor location, sex, smoking, drinking, clinical T and N stage. The primary endpoint was the hazard of 30-day major postoperative complications. Second, logistic models were applied to estimate the risk factors for pathological complete response (pCR) rate.

Results

All patients underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection. A statistically significant increase in the risk of developing major pulmonary (odds ratio [OR], 1.182; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.530-2.635; p = 0.683), anastomotic (OR, 1.881; 95% CI: 0.607-5.830; p = 0.267), cardiac (OR, 1.000; 95% CI: 0.426-2.349; p = 1.000) complications after neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus nabTP was not observed. The median interval to surgery was 39 days in the ICIs-nabTP group versus 44 days in the ICIs-TP group (p = 0.119). There was no 30-day mortality in each group. However, there was a slight difference in the 30-day readmission rate (p = 0.043) and the incidence of hydropneumothorax (p = 0.027) between the two groups. The pCR rates of the ICIs-nabTP and ICIs-TP group were 36.7 and 21.4%, respectively (p = 0.018).

Conclusions

It appears to be feasible to add immunotherapy to nabTP regimen for locally advanced ESCC. Compared with TP, nabTP plus ICIs can achieve a better pCR rate in ESCC.

SUBMITTER: Yang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9981310 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus immunotherapy versus paclitaxel plus immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Yang Yafan Y Li Haomiao H Chen Xiankai X Qin Jianjun J Li Yong Y Shen Yaxing Y Zhang Ruixiang R Kang Xiaozheng X Wang Zhen Z Zheng Qingfeng Q Luo Peng P Li Yin Y He Jie J

Thoracic cancer 20230214 7

<h4>Background</h4>This study aimed to compare the feasibility of nab-paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy (nabTP) versus paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy (TP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a neoadjuvant modality for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).<h4>Methods</h4>Between April 2019 and March 2022, we identified ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with both nabTP (n = 213) and TP (n = 98) at our institution and Henan C ...[more]

PMID: 36788648

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDefinitive chemoradiation is the preferred treatment for cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC), per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, in treatment failures, salvage surgery poses significant technical challenges. If non-responders could be identified, prior to chemoradiation, these patients may benefit from primary esophagectomy. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is widely used and recognized as an effective treatment method in various cancers including esophageal cancer. Therefore, we propose to screen for treatment response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy to select patients who are radiosensitive and potential candidates for laryngeal preservation. While non-responders are likely to be insensitive to chemoradiation would be offered radical esophagectomy.MethodsA total of 36 patients with histopathologically-confirmed locally advanced CEC have been enrolled in our study. All participants will receive 2 cycles of induction therapy, which was tislelizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Patients will be classified into 3 groups according to their response to induction therapy: a remarkable response (RR) group, limited partial response (LPR) group, and poor response (POR) group. Stratified patients will receive the following follow-up treatments: those in the RR group will receive dCRT, and those in the LPR and POR groups will undergo radical surgery. Then, participants in the RR group will be administrated with tislelizumab alone for 1 year. The choice of postoperative treatment for patients in the LPR and POR groups will depend on the patient's condition, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study is the 2-year event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), regression-free survival (RFS), objective response rate (ORR), and 5-year overall survival (OS). At the same time, we will assess the patient's quality of life (QoL).ConclusionsScreening CEC patients after immune-induction therapy combined with chemotherapy using different treatment strategies might lead to improvements in their QoL and OS time. No relevant double-endpoint studies have been reported until now. Our study is the first multicenter, prospective, exploratory study to seek the optimal treatment for locally advanced CEC patients. The results may offer high-level evidence for future CEC treatment.Trial registrationChictr.Org identifier: ChiCTR2200057732.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy have been applied to the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal regimen needs to be further explored, particularly for older patients, and the mechanisms by which the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy modulates the evolution of ESCC are unknown.MethodsIn this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with resectable (stage II/III/IV without metastasis) ESCC were enrolled and received nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel for two cycles and oral S-1 for 2 weeks, combined with intravenous toripalimab for two cycles before surgery. Combination postoperative adjuvant therapy was administered. The primary outcome was the major pathological response (MPR). Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), improvement in Stooler's dysphagia score and degree of daily living ability (dADL). Biopsies and plasma pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy were performed using whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and proximity extension assay technology (PEA) for 92 proteins.FindingsFrom November 2019 to July 2021, 60 patients were enrolled. After neoadjuvant therapy, R0 resection was achieved in 55 (98.21%) patients. MPR was identified in 27 patients (49.09%), and 16 patients (29.09%) achieved pCR. Patients with PR, SD and PD were 37 (61.67%), 21 (35.00%) and 2 (3.33%), respectively. The overall staging, Stooler dysphagia scores and dADL were significantly decreased after treatment. 11 patients (18.3%) experienced grade ≥3 AEs. Compared to PD-L1-Low patients, PD-L1-High patients had a significantly higher ratio of PR. During therapy, the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) were significantly decreased in patients with PR. Differential clonal evolution within tumors was demonstrated by analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity. Transcriptome analyses revealed that the infiltration of CD4+ T lymphocytes at baseline was associated with clinical outcome. During therapy, CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells were increased in all patients; however, exhausted cells, nTregs and iTregs were significantly increased in patients with non-MPR. Protein analyses revealed that the levels of IFN-γ, Gal.1 and LAMP3 can predict the clinical benefit. In addition, the expression of CD83, TNFRSF4, TNFSF14, VEGFR2, ADA, ARG1, and HO-1 was associated with serious AEs. More importantly, the integration of CD4+ T cells with plasma protein of IFN-γ, Gal.1 or LAMP3 could further distinguish responders from non-responders.InterpretationIn this study, neoadjuvant therapy with toripalimab, nab-paclitaxel and S-1 was less toxic and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with resectable ESCC. Changes in the genome, transcriptome, PD-L1 expression and serum proteins were comprehensively analyzed and correlated with clinical outcomes, which provides insight into the mechanism of action of toripalimab combined with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 in patients with ESCC.FundingThis study was funded by Major projects of the ministry of science and technology of the 13th five-year plan of China [grant number: 2018ZX09201013].

Dataset Information

Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus immunotherapy versus paclitaxel plus immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus immunotherapy versus paclitaxel plus immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets