Dataset Information

Final efficacy and biomarker analysis of the sorafenib arm of the BATTLE (Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination) trial

ABSTRACT: Purpose: To determine the 8-week disease control rate (DCR) of sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the BATTLE trial. Methods: Patients with pre-treated NSCLC consented to baseline biopsies for pre-specified biomarkers assessment and biomarker discovery. Sorafenib was given at 400 mg orally twice daily until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Outcomes by pre-specified biomarkers were analyzed and a Sorafenib sensitivity signature developed using high-throughput gene expression profiles of NSCLC cell lines and baseline biopsies. Results: 105 patients were eligible and 98 patients were evaluable. Median age was 62 (range 34-81) years, 51% of patients were male, 75% were former/current smokers, and 89% had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. Median prior chemotherapies for stage IV NSCLC were two. Median follow-up was 9.4 (range: 1.3-32.2) months. Overall, 8-week DCR was 58.2%. Patients with EGFR mutations had significantly lower 8-week DCR compared to patients with wild-type tumors (23.1% vs. 64.2%, P=0.0119), and patients with K-RAS mutations had the highest 8-week DCR (67%). Most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events include hand-foot syndrome (59.6%), fatigue (42.3%), rash (40.4%), diarrhea (38.5%), and weight loss (38.5%). Sorafenib sensitivity signature developed in cell lines was associated with an improved outcome. Conclusion: Patients with wild-type EGFR, including those with K-RAS mutation, may benefit from sorafenib as opposed to patients with EGFR mutation. We identify a gene expression signature associated with an improved outcome in patients with wild-type EGFR treated with sorafenib. BATTLE-2 trial is ongoing to validate those results. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00411671. Gene expression profiles were measured in 37 core biopsies from patients with refractory non-small cell lung cancer treated with sorafenib in the Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial. We report a Sorafenib sensitivity gene expression signature trained in vitro (separate GEO submission), and tested in baseline biopsies collected in the BATTLE trial.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Saintigny Pierre

PROVIDER: S-ECPF-GEOD-31428 | biostudies-other |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: To determine the 8-week disease control rate (DCR) of sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the BATTLE trial. Methods: Patients with pre-treated NSCLC consented to baseline biopsies for pre-specified biomarkers assessment and biomarker discovery. Sorafenib was given at 400 mg orally twice daily until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Outcomes by pre-specified biomarkers were analyzed and a Sorafenib sensitivity signature developed using high-throughput gene expression profiles of NSCLC cell lines and baseline biopsies. Results: 105 patients were eligible and 98 patients were evaluable. Median age was 62 (range 34-81) years, 51% of patients were male, 75% were former/current smokers, and 89% had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. Median prior chemotherapies for stage IV NSCLC were two. Median follow-up was 9.4 (range: 1.3-32.2) months. Overall, 8-week DCR was 58.2%. Patients with EGFR mutations had significantly lower 8-week DCR compared to patients with wild-type tumors (23.1% vs. 64.2%, P=0.0119), and patients with K-RAS mutations had the highest 8-week DCR (67%). Most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events include hand-foot syndrome (59.6%), fatigue (42.3%), rash (40.4%), diarrhea (38.5%), and weight loss (38.5%). Sorafenib sensitivity signature developed in cell lines was associated with an improved outcome. Conclusion: Patients with wild-type EGFR, including those with K-RAS mutation, may benefit from sorafenib as opposed to patients with EGFR mutation. We identify a gene expression signature associated with an improved outcome in patients with wild-type EGFR treated with sorafenib. BATTLE-2 trial is ongoing to validate those results. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00411671. Gene expression profiles were measured in 37 core biopsies from patients with refractory non-small cell lung cancer treated with sorafenib in the Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial. We report a Sorafenib sensitivity gene expression signature trained in vitro (separate GEO submission), and tested in baseline biopsies collected in the BATTLE trial.

Project description:PurposeBy applying the principles of real-time biopsy, biomarker-based, adaptively randomized studies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) established by the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial, we conducted BATTLE-2 (BATTLE-2 Program: A Biomarker-Integrated Targeted Therapy Study in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), an umbrella study to evaluate the effects of targeted therapies focusing on KRAS-mutated cancers.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced NSCLC (excluding sensitizing EGFR mutations and ALK gene fusions) refractory to more than one prior therapy were randomly assigned, stratified by KRAS status, to four arms: (1) erlotinib, (2) erlotinib plus MK-2206, (3) MK-2206 plus AZD6244, or (4) sorafenib. Tumor gene expression profiling-targeted next-generation sequencing was performed to evaluate predictive and prognostic biomarkers.ResultsTwo hundred patients, 27% with KRAS-mutated (KRAS mut+) tumors, were adaptively randomly assigned to erlotinib (n = 22), erlotinib plus MK-2206 (n = 42), MK-2206 plus AZD6244 (n = 75), or sorafenib (n = 61). In all, 186 patients were evaluable, and the primary end point of an 8-week disease control rate (DCR) was 48% (arm 1, 32%; arm 2, 50%; arm 3, 53%; and arm 4, 46%). For KRAS mut+ patients, DCR was 20%, 25%, 62%, and 44% whereas for KRAS wild-type patients, DCR was 36%, 57%, 49%, and 47% for arms 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.0 months, not different by KRAS status, 1.8 months for arm 1, and 2.5 months for arms 2 versus arms 3 and 4 in KRAS mut+ patients (P = .04). Median overall survival was 6.5 months, 9.0 and 5.1 months for arms 1 and 2 versus arms 3 and 4 in KRAS wild-type patients (P = .03). Median overall survival was 7.5 months in mesenchymal versus 5 months in epithelial tumors (P = .02).ConclusionDespite improved progression-free survival on therapy that did not contain erlotinib for KRAS mut+ patients and improved prognosis for mesenchymal tumors, better biomarker-driven treatment strategies are still needed.

Project description:The validity of preclinical studies of candidate therapeutic agents has been questioned given their limited ability to predict their fate in clinical development, including due to design flaws and reporting bias. In this study, we examined this issue in depth by conducting a meta-analysis of animal studies investigating the efficacy of the clinically approved kinase inhibitor, sorafenib. MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases were searched for all animal experiments testing tumor volume response to sorafenib monotherapy in any cancer published until April 20, 2012. We estimated effect sizes from experiments assessing changes in tumor volume and conducted subgroup analyses based on prespecified experimental design elements associated with internal, construct, and external validity. The meta-analysis included 97 experiments involving 1,761 animals. We excluded 94 experiments due to inadequate reporting of data. Design elements aimed at reducing internal validity threats were implemented only sporadically, with 66% reporting animal attrition and none reporting blinded outcome assessment or concealed allocation. Anticancer activity against various malignancies was typically tested in only a small number of model systems. Effect sizes were significantly smaller when sorafenib was tested against either a different active agent or combination arm. Trim and fill suggested a 37% overestimation of effect sizes across all malignancies due to publication bias. We detected a moderate dose-response in one clinically approved indication, hepatocellular carcinoma, but not in another approved malignancy, renal cell carcinoma, or when data were pooled across all malignancies tested. In support of other reports, we found that few preclinical cancer studies addressed important internal, construct, and external validity threats, limiting their clinical generalizability. Our findings reinforce the need to improve guidelines for the design and reporting of preclinical cancer studies. Cancer Res; 76(16); 4627-36. ©2016 AACR.

Dataset Information

Final efficacy and biomarker analysis of the sorafenib arm of the BATTLE (Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination) trial

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure