Dataset Information

Structure of the quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli modelled on that of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens.

ABSTRACT: The structure of methanol dehydrogenase (MDH) at 0.194 nm (1.94 A) has been used to provide a model structure for part of a membrane quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase (GDH). The basic superbarrel structure is retained, along with the tryptophan-docking motifs. The active-site regions are similar, but there are important differences, the most important being that GDH lacks the novel disulphide ring structure formed from adjacent cysteines in MDH; in GDH the equivalent region is occupied by His-262. Because of the overall similarities in the active-site region, the mechanism of action of GDH is likely to be similar to that of MDH. The differences in co-ordination to the cation and bonding to the pyrrolo-quinoline quinone (PQQ) in the active site may explain the relative ease of dissociation of the prosthetic group from the holo-GDH. There are considerable differences in the external loops, particularly those involved in formation of the shallow funnel leading to the active site, the configuration of which influences substrate specificity. The proposed model is consistent in many respects with previous proposals for the active-site structure based on the effects of chemical modification on binding of PQQ and enzymic activity.

SUBMITTER: Cozier GE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1136167 | biostudies-other | 1995 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:In order to provide information about the gene expression response that occurs when cells experience a change in carbon source, succinate limited chemostat cultures of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 were grown to and maintained at an OD of ~0.63, transferred to flasks and methanol was added. Cells were harvested for RNA extraction at time: 0 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr and 6 hr post transition. At 30 min, a no methanol addition sample was extracted as a carbon starvation control. These data were used in conjunction with flux, enzymatic and metabolite measurements to assess the changes in central metabolism during this transition. Abstract from manuscript: When organisms experience environmental change, how does their metabolic network reset and adapt to the new condition? This study focused on the mechanisms of metabolic adaptation occurring during the transition from succinate to methanol growth by the methylotrophic bacterium Methylobacterium extorquens, analyzing changes in carbon flux, gene expression, metabolites and enzymatic activities over time. Initially, cells experienced metabolic imbalance with excretion of metabolites, changes in nucleotide levels and cessation of cell growth. Though assimilatory pathways were induced rapidly, a transient block in carbon flow to biomass synthesis occurred, and enzymatic assays suggested methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase as one control point. This “downstream priming” mechanism ensures that significant carbon flux through these pathways does not occur until they are fully induced, precluding the buildup of toxic intermediates. Most metabolites that are required for growth on both carbon sources did not change significantly, even though transcripts and enzymatic activities required for their production changed radically, underscoring the concept of metabolic setpoints. Gene expression in succinate limited chemostat cultures was compared to gene expression in cells transferred to flasks before and after methanol addition. As a control, a time = 0 sample (RNA prepared from cells harvested directly from the chemostat) was compared to a time = 0 sample immediately obtained after the cells were transferred to flasks, before methanol was added in order to identify changes due to flask transfer. A carbon starvation control was also done comparing expression from time = 0 (chemostat cells) to cells transferred to flasks for 30 min with no carbon source added. Two biological replicates each with two techinal replicates (dye swap) were analyzed for time = 0 (chemostat) vs 10 min, 30 min, 1 hr and 2 hr after methanol addition. One biological replicate with two technical replicates (dye swap) were analyzed for time = 0 (chemostat) vs time = 0 (flask transfer), and time = 0 (chemostat) vs time = 4 hr, 6 hr and 30 min no methanol addition.

Dataset Information

Structure of the quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli modelled on that of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets