Dataset Information

Sugar transport in rat liver lysosomes. Direct demonstration by using labelled sugars.

ABSTRACT: Purified rat liver lysosomes ('tritosomes') were prepared from rats injected with Triton WR-1339. 2. The water space of tritosomes, measured by using [3H]water and [14C]sucrose, was 2.15 +/- 0.72 microliter/mg of protein (mean +/- S.E.M., n = 12). 3. Tritosomes, when compared with a crude preparation of normal lysosomes by an indirect method of study, showed sugar specificity but decreased stereospecificity of sugar uptake. 4. At 125 mM the relative rates of net uptake of D-[14C]ribose, D-[14C]- or D-[3H]glucose and 2-deoxy-D-[3H]glucose were the same as that inferred from the indirect study. 5. The entry of D-[3H]glucose into tritosomes showed concentration-dependence suggestive of saturation, with a Km of 48 +/- 18 mM (4). 6. D- and L-glucose, D-ribose, 2-deoxy-D-glucose and D-mannose competed with D-[14C]glucose or D-[14C]ribose for uptake. 7. Cytochalasin B inhibited D-[3H]glucose uptake. 8. Uptake of 1 mM-L-[14C]glucose was slower than for 1 mM-D-[14C]glucose. 9. It is concluded that a facilitated-diffusion transport system is present in purified rat liver lysosomes.

SUBMITTER: Maguire GA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1152031 | biostudies-other | 1983 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:We measured the distribution of sugar solution within groups of caged honey bees (Apis mellifera) under standard in vitro laboratory conditions using 14C polyethylene glycol as a radioactive marker to analyze ingestion by individual bees after group feeding. We studied the impact of different experimental setups by varying the number of bees, age of bees, origin of bees, duration of experiment, the amount of available diet, and the influence of the neurotoxic pesticide imidacloprid in the diet on the feeding and food sharing behavior (trophallaxis). Sugar solution was non-uniformly distributed in bees in 36 out of 135 cages. As a measure of the extent to which the sugar diet was equally distributed between caged bees, we calculated the (inner 80%) intake ratio by dividing the intake of the 90th percentile bee by the intake of the 10th percentile bee. This intake ratio ranged from 1.3 to 94.8 in 133 individual cages, further supporting a non-uniform distribution of food among caged bees. We can expect a cage with 10 or 30 bees containing one bee that ingests, on average, the 8.8-fold of the bee in the same cage ingesting the smallest quantity of food. Inner 80% intake ratios were lower in experiments with a permanent or chronic offering of labelled sugar solution compared to temporary or acute feedings. After pooling the data of replicates to achieve a higher statistical power we compared different experimental setups. We found that uniform food distribution is best approached with 10 newly emerged bees per cage, which originate from a brood comb from a single colony. We also investigated the trophallaxis between caged honey bees which originally consumed the diet and newly added bees. Color marked bees were starved and added to the cages in a ratio of 10:5 or 20:20 after the initial set of bees consumed all the labelled sugar solution. The distribution of the labelled sugar solution by trophallaxis within 48 hours to added bees was 25% (10:5) or 45% (20:20) of the initial sugar solution. Imidacloprid at its median lethal dose (LD50) in the sugar solution reduced this post-feeding food transmission to 27% (20:20). Our results show that differences in food intake exist within caged bees that may lead to differential exposure that can influence the interpretation of toxicity tests.

Project description:BackgroundThe gastrointestinal tract is responsible for the assimilation of nutrients and plays a key role in the regulation of nutrient metabolism and energy balance. The molecular mechanisms by which intestinal sugar transport are regulated are controversial. Based on rodent studies, two models currently exist that involve activation of the sweet-taste receptor, T1R2/3: an indirect model, whereby luminal carbohydrates activate T1R2/3 expressed on enteroendocrine cells, resulting in the release of gut peptides which in turn regulate enterocyte sugar transport capacity; and a direct model, whereby T1R2/3 expressed on the enterocyte regulates enterocyte function.AimsTo study the direct model of intestinal sugar transport using CaCo-2 cells, a well-established in vitro model of the human enterocyte.MethodsUptake of 10mM 14C D-Glucose and D-Fructose into confluent CaCo-2/TC7 cells was assessed following 3hr preincubation with sugars and artificial sweeteners in the presence and absence of the sweet taste receptor inhibitor, lactisole. Expression of the intestinal sugar transporters and sweet-taste receptors were also determined by RT-PCR.ResultsIn response to short term changes in extracellular glucose and glucose/fructose concentrations (2.5mM to 75mM) carrier-mediated sugar uptake mediated by SGLT1 and/or the facilitative hexose transporters (GLUT1,2,3 and 5) was increased. Lactisole and artificial sweeteners had no effect on sugar transport regulated by glucose alone; however, lactisole increased glucose transport in cells exposed to glucose/fructose. RT-PCR revealed Tas1r3 and SGLT3 gene expression in CaCo-2/TC7 cells, but not Tas1r2.ConclusionsIn the short term, enterocyte sugar transport activities respond directly to extracellular glucose levels, but not fructose or artificial sweeteners. We found no evidence of a functional heterodimeric sweet taste receptor, T1R2/3 in CaCo-2 cells. However, when glucose/fructose is administered together there is an inhibitory effect on glucose transport possibly mediated by T1R3.

Dataset Information

Sugar transport in rat liver lysosomes. Direct demonstration by using labelled sugars.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets