Dataset Information

Gastric cancer below the age of 55: implications for screening patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia.

ABSTRACT: AIMS: To test the hypothesis that gastric cancer presenting with uncomplicated dyspepsia is rare below the age of 55. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The area studied was the postcode defined catchment area of a district general hospital (Gloucestershire Royal) serving a population of 280,500. An open access endoscopy service has been available in this district for more than 17 years. All cases of gastric cancer during a seven year period (1986-92) were drawn from the local pathology database. The database of the neighbouring hospital and the South West Cancer Registry were searched for missed cases from the postcoded area. Hospital and general practitioner records were retrospectively reviewed with respect to duration of symptoms, and previous consultation and investigation for dyspepsia; and alarming symptoms and signs suggestive of underlying malignancy (unexplained recent weight loss, dysphagia, haematemesis or melaena, anaemia, previous gastric surgery, palpable mass, and perforation). RESULTS: Twenty five of 319 cases of gastric cancer detected during the seven year period were aged less than 55. Twenty four of these 25 patients presented with one or more suspicious symptoms or signs. Only one patient (4%) aged less than 55 presented with uncomplicated dyspepsia. In two patients there was a delay in diagnosis of more than six months after first presenting to the general practitioner. Both these patients had significant symptoms at presentation. CONCLUSION: Gastric cancer is rare below the of 55 (7.8% of all cases) and, even in the presence of established open access endoscopy, presents with suspicious symptoms or signs in 96% of cases. The age limit for screening uncomplicated dyspepsia can be raised safely to 55.

SUBMITTER: Christie J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1891526 | biostudies-other | 1997 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIt is very necessary to implement gastric cancer screening in China to reduce the mortality of gastric cancer, but there are no national screening guidelines and programs. Understanding of individual preferences is conducive to formulating more acceptable screening strategies, and discrete choice experiments can quantify individual preferences. In addition, the first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients are at high risk for gastric cancer. Compared with those without a family history of gastric cancer, the risk of gastric cancer in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients is increased by 60%. Therefore, a discrete choice experiment was carried out to quantitatively analyse the preferences of first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients for gastric cancer screening to serve as a reference for the development of gastric cancer screening strategies.MethodsA questionnaire was designed based on a discrete choice experiment, and 342 first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients were investigated. In STATA 15.0 software, the data were statistically analysed using a mixed logit model.ResultsThe five attributes included in our study had a significant influence on the preferences of first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients for gastric cancer screening (P < 0.05). Participants most preferred the sensitivity of the screening program to be 95% (coefficient = 1.424, P < 0.01) with a willingness to pay 2501.902 Yuan (95% CI, 738.074-4265.729). In addition, the participants' sex and screening experiences affected their preferences. An increase in sensitivity 35 to 95% had the greatest impact on the participants' willingness to choose a gastric cancer screening program.ConclusionThe formulation of gastric cancer screening strategies should be rooted in people's preferences. The influence of sex differences and screening experiences on the preferences of people undergoing screening should be considered, and screening strategies should be formulated according to local conditions to help them play a greater role.

Project description:BackgroundMultiple guidelines seek to alter rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening. The costs borne by payers associated with PSA-based screening for men of different age groups-including the costs of screening and subsequent diagnosis, treatment, and adverse events-remain uncertain. We sought to develop a model of PSA costs that could be used by payers and health care systems to inform cost considerations under a range of different scenarios.MethodsWe determined the prevalence of PSA screening among men aged 50 and higher using 2013-2014 data from a large, multispecialty group, obtained reimbursed costs associated with screening, diagnosis, and treatment from a commercial health plan, and identified transition probabilities for biopsy, diagnosis, treatment, and complications from the literature to generate a cost model. We estimated annual total costs for groups of men ages 50-54, 55-69, and 70+ years, and varied annual prostate cancer screening prevalence in each group from 5 to 50% and tested hypothetical examples of different test characteristics (e.g., true/false positive rate).ResultsUnder the baseline screening patterns, costs of the PSA screening represented 10.1% of the total costs; costs of biopsies and associated complications were 23.3% of total costs; and, although only 0.3% of all screen eligible patients were treated, they accounted for 66.7% of total costs. For each 5-percentage point decrease in PSA screening among men aged 70 and older for a single calendar year, total costs associated with prostate cancer screening decreased by 13.8%. For each 5-percentage point decrease in PSA screening among men 50-54 and 55-69 years old, costs were 2.3% and 7.3% lower respectively.ConclusionsWith constrained financial resources and with national pressure to decrease use of clinically unnecessary PSA-based prostate cancer screening, there is an opportunity for cost savings, especially by focusing on the downstream costs disproportionately associated with screening men 70 and older.

Project description:Background Survival prediction for cervical cancer is usually based on its stage at diagnosis or a multivariate nomogram. However, few studies cared whether long-term survival improved after they survived for several years. Meanwhile, traditional survival analysis could not calculate this dynamic outcome. We aimed to assess the improvement of survival over time using conditional survival (CS) analysis and developed a novel conditional survival nomogram (CS-nomogram) to provide individualized and real-time prognostic information. Methods Cervical cancer patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan–Meier method estimated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and calculated the conditional CSS (C-CSS) at year y+x after giving x years of survival based on the formula C-CSS(y|x) =CSS(y+x)/CSS(x). y indicated the number of years of further survival under the condition that the patient was determined to have survived for x years. The study identified predictors by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and used multivariate Cox regression to demonstrate these predictors’ effect on CSS and to develop a nomogram. Finally, the CSS possibilities predicted by the nomogram were brought into the C-CSS formula to create the CS-nomogram. Results A total of 18,511 patients aged <65 years with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2019 were included in this study. CS analysis revealed that the 15-year CSS increased year by year from the initial 72.6% to 77.8%, 84.5%, 88.8%, 91.5%, 93.5%, 94.8%, 95.7%, 96.4%, 97.3%, 98.0%, 98.5%, 99.1%, and 99.4% (after surviving for 1-13 years, respectively), and found that when survival exceeded 5-6 years, the risk of death from cervical cancer would be less than 5% in 10-15 years. The CS-nomogram constructed using tumor size, lymph node status, distant metastasis status, and histological grade showed strong predictive performance with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.805 and a stable area under the curve (AUC) between 0.795 and 0.816 over 15 years. Conclusions CS analysis in this study revealed the gradual improvement of CSS over time in long-term survived cervical cancer patients. We applied CS to the nomogram and developed a CS-nomogram successfully predicting individualized and real-time prognosis.

Project description:ImportanceThe World Health Organization is developing a global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer, with goals for screening prevalence among women aged 30 through 49 years. However, evidence on prevalence levels of cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is sparse.ObjectiveTo determine lifetime cervical cancer screening prevalence in LMICs and its variation across and within world regions and countries.Design, setting, and participantsAnalysis of cross-sectional nationally representative household surveys carried out in 55 LMICs from 2005 through 2018. The median response rate across surveys was 93.8% (range, 64.0%-99.3%). The population-based sample consisted of 1 136 289 women aged 15 years or older, of whom 6885 (0.6%) had missing information for the survey question on cervical cancer screening.ExposuresWorld region, country; countries' economic, social, and health system characteristics; and individuals' sociodemographic characteristics.Main outcomes and measuresSelf-report of having ever had a screening test for cervical cancer.ResultsOf the 1 129 404 women included in the analysis, 542 475 were aged 30 through 49 years. A country-level median of 43.6% (interquartile range [IQR], 13.9%-77.3%; range, 0.3%-97.4%) of women aged 30 through 49 years self-reported to have ever been screened, with countries in Latin America and the Caribbean having the highest prevalence (country-level median, 84.6%; IQR, 65.7%-91.1%; range, 11.7%-97.4%) and those in sub-Saharan Africa the lowest prevalence (country-level median, 16.9%; IQR, 3.7%-31.0%; range, 0.9%-50.8%). There was large variation in the self-reported lifetime prevalence of cervical cancer screening among countries within regions and among countries with similar levels of per capita gross domestic product and total health expenditure. Within countries, women who lived in rural areas, had low educational attainment, or had low household wealth were generally least likely to self-report ever having been screened.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study of data collected in 55 low- and middle-income countries from 2005 through 2018, there was wide variation between countries in the self-reported lifetime prevalence of cervical cancer screening. However, the median prevalence was only 44%, supporting the need to increase the rate of screening.

Dataset Information

Gastric cancer below the age of 55: implications for screening patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets