Dataset Information

A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function.

ABSTRACT: The West, Brown, and Enquist (WBE) theory for the origin of allometric scaling laws is centered on the idea that the geometry of the vascular network governs how a suite of organismal traits covary with each other and, ultimately, how they scale with organism size. This core assumption has been combined with other secondary assumptions based on physiological constraints, such as minimizing the scaling of transport and biomechanical costs while maximally filling a volume. Together, these assumptions give predictions for specific "quarter-power" scaling exponents in biology. Here we provide a strong test of the core assumption of WBE by examining how well it holds when the secondary assumptions have been relaxed. Our relaxed version of WBE predicts that allometric exponents are highly constrained and covary according to specific quantitative functions. To test this core prediction, we assembled several botanical data sets with measures of the allometry of morphological traits. A wide variety of plant taxa appear to obey the predictions of the model. Our results (i) underscore the importance of network geometry in governing the variability and central tendency of biological exponents, (ii) support the hypothesis that selection has primarily acted to minimize the scaling of hydrodynamic resistance, and (iii) suggest that additional selection pressures for alternative branching geometries govern much of the observed covariation in biological scaling exponents. Understanding how selection shapes hierarchical branching networks provides a general framework for understanding the origin and covariation of many allometric traits within a complex integrated phenotype.

SUBMITTER: Price CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1941814 | biostudies-other | 2007 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function.

Price Charles A CA Enquist Brian J BJ Savage Van M VM

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20070730 32

The West, Brown, and Enquist (WBE) theory for the origin of allometric scaling laws is centered on the idea that the geometry of the vascular network governs how a suite of organismal traits covary with each other and, ultimately, how they scale with organism size. This core assumption has been combined with other secondary assumptions based on physiological constraints, such as minimizing the scaling of transport and biomechanical costs while maximally filling a volume. Together, these assumpti ...[more]

PMID: 17664421

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo explore and apply multimodel inference to test the relative contributions of latent genetic, environmental and direct causal factors to the covariation between two variables with data from the classical twin design by estimating model-averaged parameters.MethodsBehavior genetics is concerned with understanding the causes of variation in phenotypes and the causes of covariation between two or more phenotypes. Two variables may correlate as a result of genetic, shared environmental or unique environmental factors contributing to variation in both variables. Two variables may also correlate because one or both directly cause variation in the other. Furthermore, covariation may result from any combination of these sources, leading to 25 different identified structural equation models. OpenMx was used to fit all these models to account for covariation between two variables collected in twins. Multimodel inference and model averaging were used to summarize the key sources of covariation, and estimate the magnitude of these causes of covariance. Extensions of these models to test heterogeneity by sex are discussed.ResultsWe illustrate the application of multimodel inference by fitting a comprehensive set of bivariate models to twin data from the Virginia Twin Study of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders. Analyses of body mass index and tobacco consumption data show sufficient power to reject distinct models, and to estimate the contribution of each of the five potential sources of covariation, irrespective of selecting the best fitting model. Discrimination between models on sample size, type of variable (continuous versus binary or ordinal measures) and the effect size of sources of variance and covariance.ConclusionsWe introduce multimodel inference and model averaging approaches to the behavior genetics community, in the context of testing models for the causes of covariation between traits in term of genetic, environmental and causal explanations.

Dataset Information

A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function.

Publications

A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets