Operative considerations in resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Parikh AA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2043101 | biostudies-other | 2005
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically challenging because it involves complicated laparoscopic procedures that include laparoscopic hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy, hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, and hepaticojejunostomy. There are currently very few reports describing this type of surgery. Between August 2014 and December 2014, 5 patients underwent total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Two patients with type I or II hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent radical hilar resection. Three patients with type IIIa or IIIb cholangiocarcinoma underwent extended hemihepatectomy together with caudate lobectomy. The median (range) age, operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 63 years (43-76 years), 610 minutes (410-665 minutes), 650 mL (450-1,300 mL), and 12 days (9-21 days), respectively. Four patients had a negative margin, but 1 patient was diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia on the proximal resection margin. The median tumor size was 3.0 cm. One patient experienced postoperative biliary leakage, which resolved spontaneously. Laparoscopic resection is a feasible surgical approach in selected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
| S-EPMC4595825 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSurgery is the only curative therapy for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). Combined portal vein resection (PVR) could achieve negative resection margins in HCCA patients with portal vein invasion. This systematic review aimed to analysis the efficiency of combined PVR for HCCA.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and clinical trial registries were searched through April 2015. Risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.ResultsThe analysis included 21 retrospective studies, altogether involving 2403 patients (patients with PVR, n=637; patients without PVR, n=1766). Patients with PVR were likely to have more advanced HCCA (lymphatic invasion: RR=1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.28; perineural invasion: RR=1.31, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.63) and suffered less curative resections (RR=0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). Postoperative morbidity was similar between patients with or without PVR (RR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.02). Patients with PVR suffered higher mortality rate (RR=1.52, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.18), and worse 5-year survival rate (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.91).ConclusionCombined PVR for HCCA patients would not increase postoperative morbidity rate. However, ascribed to PVR group concluded more advanced HCCA patients; patients with PVR had increased postoperative mortality rate and worse survival rate. The results still need further high quality trails for validation.
| S-EPMC4723880 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA right trisectionectomy with portal vein resection represents the conventional approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Here, we present a technical modification of hilar en bloc resection in order to increase the remnant volume by partially preserving liver segment 4.MethodsThe caudal parenchymal dissection line starts centrally between the left lateral and left medial segments. Cranially, the resection line switches to the right towards Cantlie's line and turns again upwards perpendicularly. Hence, segment 4a and subtotal segment 4b are partially preserved by this novel technique. The left hepatic duct is dissected at the segmental ramification and reconstruction is performed as a single hepaticojejunostomy. The feasibility of the novel parenchyma-sparing approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma was proven in a case series and medical records were reviewed retrospectively.ResultsTen patients (6 male, 4 female) underwent segment 4 partially preserving right trisectionectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Estimated future liver remnant volume was significantly increased (FLRV 38.3%), when compared to standard right trisectionectomy (FLRV 23.9%; p < 0.01). Three of 10 liver resections were associated with major surgical complications (≥IIIb; n = 3); categorized according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. No patient died due to complications associated with postoperatively impaired liver function. Tumor-free margins could be achieved in 8 patients while median overall survival and disease-free survival were 547 and 367 days, respectively.ConclusionThis novel parenchyma-sparing modification of hilar en bloc resection by partially preserving segment 4 allows to safely increase the remnant liver volume without neglecting principles of local radicality.
| S-EPMC6223732 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:This study is aimed at investigating the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic radical resection for treating type III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma (III/IV Hilar C). Methods:Six patients with III/IV Hilar C were enrolled in our hospital. All patients underwent total laparoscopic surgery, including basic surgery (laparoscopic gallbladder, hilar bile duct, and common bile duct resection and hepatoduodenal ligament lymph node dissection) combined with left hepatic and caudate lobe resection/portal resection. The tumor size, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were observed. The follow-up of the patients after discharge was recorded. Results:Surgery was successfully completed in 6 patients. We found that the tumor size of 6 patients ranged from 1.5 to 3.6?cm, with 4 lymph nodes. The operation time was 540-660 minutes, and the blood loss was 300-500?ml. One patient developed bile leakage after surgery, healed within 2 weeks after drainage. The postoperative hospital stay was 16 (13-24) days. There were 4 cases of negative bile duct margin tumor, 1 case was positive, and 1 case was not reported. All 6 patients were discharged smoothly without perioperative death. Regular examinations were conducted every 3 months after discharge, and the median duration was 7 months. Only 1 patient had a marginal dysplasia, and 5 patients had no obvious signs of recurrence. Conclusions:Application of laparoscopic radical resection for III/IV Hilar C is safe and feasible and has good short-term efficacy with adequate preoperative evaluation, appropriate case selection, and precise operative strategy.
| S-EPMC7060852 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is still in its infancy. The biliary-enteric reconstruction represents one of the most delicate parts of this minimally invasive procedure.MethodsIn this study, a 78-year old woman with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) type 3b underwent a hepaticojejunostomy performed by a parachute technique.ResultsThe operation, performed totally by minimally invasive resections, was completed in 386 min, with a blood loss of less than 400 ml and no transfusion requirements. Two intraluminal stents were placed during the hepaticojenunostomy for splinting of the biliary-enteric anastomosis. The patient required prolonged antibiotic treatment for postoperative cholangitis and finally was discharged on postoperative day 15. The histopathologic grading displayed a G 2-3 adenocarcinoma, pT3 pN0, M0, L1, V1, pN1, UICC IIIc R0, and the patient was referred to adjuvant chemotherapy.ConclusionResections of pCCAs, performed totally by minimally invasive techniques, may be feasible and safe for a selected group of patients. With this approach, a running-suture hepaticojejunostomy using the parachute technique represents a worthwhile strategy for biliary-enteric reconstruction.
| S-EPMC7940288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with R0 resection being currently the only option for long-term survival. With the improvement in the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT), the indications for LT have expanded to include other malignant tumors, such as hCCA. The aim of the present analysis is to demonstrate and critically evaluate the outcomes of LT compared to resection with curative intent in patients with hCCA.MethodsWe systematically searched the literature for articles published up to May 2018. The following algorithm was applied ((hilar cholangiocarcinoma) OR (perihilar cholangiocarcinoma) OR klatskin$ OR (bile duct neoplasm) OR cholangiocarcinoma) AND (transplant$ OR graft$).ResultsNeoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy was far more common in the LT group, with very few patients having received preoperative therapy in the resection group (p = 0.0005). Moreover, length of hospital stay was shorter after LT than after resection (p<0.00001). In contrast, no difference was found between the two treatment methods concerning postoperative mortality (p = 0.57). There was a trend towards longer overall survival after LT in comparison with resection. This was not obvious in the first year postoperatively, however, the advantage of LT over resection became obvious at 3 years after the operation (p = 0.02).ConclusionsIn non-disseminated unresectable tumors, LT seems to have a non-inferior survival. In the same patients, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and/or strict selection criteria may contribute to superior survival outcomes compared to curative-intent resection. Due to the scarcity of level 1 evidence, it remains unclear whether LT should be increasingly considered for technically resectable early stage hCCA.
| S-EPMC6668826 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn light of recent advances in multimodality treatment, an analysis of vascular resection outcomes in surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is lacking.ObjectiveThe aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the currently available evidence on outcomes of patients undergoing arterial resection for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsA systematic literature search in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, and the trial registries ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be carried out. Predefined outcomes are mortality (100-day and in-hospital), morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification, any type of complication), vascular complications (thrombosis or stenosis of the portal vein or hepatic artery, pseudoaneurysms), liver failure, postoperative bleeding, duration of surgery, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, survival time, actuarial survival (2-, 3-, and 5-year survival), complete/incomplete resection rates, histologic arterial invasion, and lymph node positivity (number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio).ResultsDatabase searches will commence in December 2020. The meta-analysis will be completed by December 2021.ConclusionsOur findings will enable us to present the current evidence on the feasibility, safety, and oncological effectiveness of surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with arterial resection. Our data will support health care professionals and patients in their clinical decision-making.Trial registrationPROSPERO 223396; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=223396.International registered report identifier (irrid)DERR1-10.2196/31212.
| S-EPMC8527376 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a rare and highly aggressive biliary tract neoplasm. As such, the data driving the management of this disease generally are not based on prospective clinical trial data but rather consist of retrospective experiences and limited level 1 data. Surgical resection offers the best chance of a long-term survival, but local and distant recurrences are common. This report presents landmark articles that form the basis of preoperative, operative, and adjuvant strategies for HC.
| S-EPMC9273057 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: The numbers of margin-negative resections and survival times have greatly improved because of a more aggressive surgical approach to resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumour). It was shown initially by Japanese authors that complete resection of the caudate lobe together with partial hepatectomy leads to more margin-negative resections. However, this concept has not been unanimously taken up by Western authors. The aim of this study was to examine the role of complete caudate lobe resection in our series of resected hilar cholangiocarcinomas. METHODS: Between January 1993 and January 2003, 54 patients underwent resection for Klatskin tumours. These patients were divided into two groups, according to the two 5-year periods in which they had been operated. In the first period, patients did not routinely undergo complete excision of the caudate lobe, whereas in the second period, partial liver resection was combined with complete excision of the caudate lobe in 15 patients. These two patient groups were evaluated with respect to postoperative morbidity and mortality, microscopic tumour margins and survival time. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 59% of patients in total, while overall mortality was 11%. No difference was found in postoperative morbidity or mortality between the two periods. A significantly higher number of margin-negative resections was found in the second 5-year period, together with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Concomitant complete excision of segment 1 for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma did not lead to increased morbidity or mortality. Therefore the addition of complete excision of segment 1 is a safe procedure contributing to a higher rate of R0 resections and improved survival.
| S-EPMC2043102 | biostudies-other
Project description:Cancer arising from the proximal biliary tree, or hilar cholangiocarcinoma, remains a difficult clinical problem. Significant experience with these uncommon tumors has been limited to a small number of centers, which has greatly hindered progress. Complete resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most effective and only potentially curative therapy, and it now clear that concomitant hepatic resection is required in most cases. Simply stated, long-term survival is generally possible only with an en bloc resection of the liver with the extrahepatic biliary apparatus, leaving behind a well perfused liver remnant with adequate biliary-enteric drainage. Preoperative imaging studies should aim to assess this possibility and must evaluate a number of tumor-related factors that influence resectability. Advances in imaging technology have improved patient selection, but a large proportion of patients are found to have unresectable disease only at the time of exploration. Staging laparoscopy and (13)fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may help to identify some patients with advanced disease; however, local tumor extent, an equally critical determinant of resectability, may be underestimated on preoperative studies. This paper reviews issues pertaining to diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of patients with hilar biliary obstruction. Knowledge of the imaging features of hilar tumors, particularly as they pertain to resectability, is of obvious importance for clinicians managing these patients.
| S-EPMC2043098 | biostudies-other