Dataset Information

Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle biopsy for metastatic melanoma and its implications for patient management.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The use of fine needle biopsy (FNB) for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma can lead to the early removal and treatment of metastases, reduce the frequency of unnecessary surgery, and facilitate the staging of patients enrolled in clinical trials of adjuvant therapies. In this study, the accuracy of FNB for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was investigated. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with 2204 consecutive FNBs performed on 1416 patients known or suspected to have metastatic melanoma. Almost three-quarters (1582) of these FNBs were verified by either histopathologic diagnosis following surgical resection or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: FNB for metastatic melanoma was found to have an overall sensitivity of 92.1% and a specificity of 99.2%, with 69 false-negative and 5 false-positive findings identified. The sensitivity of the procedure was found to be influenced by six factors. The use of immunostains, reporting of the specimen by a cytopathologist who had reported >500 cases, lesions located in the skin and subcutis, and patients with ulcerated primary melanomas were factors associated with a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the test. However, FNBs performed in masses located in lymph nodes of the axilla and FNBs that required more than one needle pass to obtain a sample were far more likely to result in false-negative results. CONCLUSIONS: FNB is a rapid, accurate, and clinically useful technique for the assessment of disease status in patients with suspected metastatic melanoma.

SUBMITTER: Doubrovsky A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2190340 | biostudies-other | 2008 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles were designed to improve histologic yield, while maintaining the flexibility to permit ease of use. However, the diagnostic benefit of EUS-FNB needles as compared to the conventional fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the diagnostic accuracy of combined needle use of a new 20-gauge ProCore FNB needle and a 25-gauge FNA needle. Methods: For this study, cases were selected in which both the 20-gauge ProCore FNB needle and the 25-gauge FNA needle were used during a single EUS procedure for sampling of a solid pancreatic mass, lymph node, or submucosal mass. Tissue acquisition was performed in the course of the ASPRO trial, a multicenter randomized study comparing the diagnostic value of 20-gauge ProCore FNB and 25-gauge FNA needles (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02167074). The protocol allowed additional sampling with the nonassigned needle, at the discretion of an endosonographer. Results: Of all 615 patients who were randomized for the ASPRO study, 74 were sampled with both needle types. In these combined needle cases, FNA was used first in 24 and ProCore FNB in 50 cases. Target lesions encompassed 39 solid pancreatic lesions, 18 submucosal masses, and 17 lymph nodes. Most pancreatic lesions were located in the head (25/39), lymph nodes were mainly located in the abdomen (15/18), and submucosal lesions were located in the stomach (8/20), esophagus (4/20), small intestines (3/20), and rectum (3/20). The main reason to use ProCore in addition to FNA was to collect more tissue for ancillary testing (79%). FNA was generally used in addition to ProCore to allow for on-site pathological assessment (76%). The regimen of FNA followed by ProCore resulted in 100% accuracy, while for ProCore followed by FNA, 88% was reached (P = 0.086). The type of target lesion, either pancreatic or nonpancreatic, did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of the two sampling regimens (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.22–6.61, P = 0.834). Conclusion: FNA followed by ProCore FNB provides for a 100% diagnostic accuracy and tends to outperform ProCore FNB followed by FNA. Accuracy rates were independent of the type of target lesion.

Project description:ImportanceFine-needle biopsy (FNB) became a critical part of thyroid nodule evaluation in the 1970s. It is not clear how diagnostic accuracy of FNB has changed over time.ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the accuracy of thyroid FNB for diagnosis of malignancy in adults with a newly diagnosed thyroid nodule and to characterize changes in accuracy over time.Data sourcesPubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1975 to 2020 using search terms related to FNB accuracy in the thyroid.Study selectionEnglish-language reports of cohort studies or randomized trials of adult patients undergoing thyroid FNB with sample size of 20 or greater and using a reference standard of surgical histopathology or clinical follow-up were included. Articles that examined only patients with known thyroid disease or focused on accuracy of novel adjuncts, such as molecular tests, were excluded. Two investigators screened each article and resolved conflicts by consensus. A total of 36 of 1023 studies met selection criteria.Data extraction and synthesisThe MOOSE guidelines were used for data abstraction and assessing data quality and validity. Two investigators abstracted data using a standard form. Studies were grouped into epochs by median data collection year (1975 to 1990, 1990 to 2000, 2000 to 2010, and 2010 to 2020). Data were pooled using a bivariate mixed-effects model.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was accuracy of FNB for diagnosis of malignancy. Accuracy was hypothesized to increase in later time periods, a hypothesis formulated prior to data collection.ResultsOf 16 597 included patients, 12 974 (79.2%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 47.3 (12.9) years. The sensitivity of FNB was 85.6% (95% CI, 79.9-89.5), the specificity was 71.4% (95% CI, 61.1-79.8), the positive likelihood ratio was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3-4.1), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.2-0.3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 86.1%. Epoch was not significantly associated with accuracy. None of the available covariates could explain observed heterogeneity.Conclusions and relevanceAccuracy of thyroid FNB has not significantly changed over time. Important developments in technique, preparation, and interpretation may have occurred too heterogeneously to capture a consistent uptrend over time. FNB remains a reliable test for thyroid cancer diagnosis.

Dataset Information

Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle biopsy for metastatic melanoma and its implications for patient management.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets