Dataset Information

Comparison of idiopathic, post-trauma and post-surgery frozen shoulder after manipulation under anesthesia.

ABSTRACT: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been used to speed up the recovery of frozen shoulder, which is said to be a self-limiting process. We would like to elucidate the short- and long-term results of the treatment of frozen shoulders by manipulation under anesthesia and compare the results of idiopathic, post-trauma and post-surgery frozen shoulders. We applied an adjusted Constant score (Constant score after excluding the 25 points allocated for the assessment of muscle strength) to assess all patients. In our series, 47 cases with 51 frozen shoulders were collected and evaluated retrospectively. The adjusted Constant score at pre-manipulation was on average 22.8+/-4.9 (10-31) points. The score from the 3-week follow-up was 52.6+/-9.2 (31-67) points on average. The score from the averaged 82-month follow-up was on average 70.1+/-6.2 (54-75) points, with 23 shoulders scored for a maximum point number of 75. The score at the early and late follow-ups was significantly lower for the post-surgery group (63.2+/-6.7) when compared to the other two groups (P<0.001). Our results revealed that manipulation under anaesthesia is a very simple and noninvasive procedure for shortening the course of an apparently self-limiting disease and can improve shoulder function and symptoms within a short period of time. However, we found less improvement in post-surgery frozen shoulders, especially in residual pain and limited range of motion (ROM), which may be influenced by the initial injury or initial surgery. Although less improvement in pain and ROM was noted, manipulation is still a good and simple way to treat post-surgery frozen shoulders.

SUBMITTER: Wang JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2267597 | biostudies-other | 2007 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThere are a myriad of available treatment options for patients with frozen shoulder, which can be overwhelming to the treating health care professional.ObjectiveTo assess and compare the effectiveness of available treatment options for frozen shoulder to guide musculoskeletal practitioners and inform guidelines.Data sourcesMedline, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINHAL were searched in February 2020.Study selectionStudies with a randomized design of any type that compared treatment modalities for frozen shoulder with other modalities, placebo, or no treatment were included.Data extraction and synthesisData were independently extracted by 2 individuals. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Random-effects models were used.Main outcomes and measuresPain and function were the primary outcomes, and external rotation range of movement (ER ROM) was the secondary outcome. Results of pairwise meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MDs) for pain and ER ROM and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for function. Length of follow-up was divided into short-term (≤12 weeks), mid-term (>12 weeks to ≤12 months), and long-term (>12 months) follow-up.ResultsFrom a total of 65 eligible studies with 4097 participants that were included in the systematic review, 34 studies with 2402 participants were included in pairwise meta-analyses and 39 studies with 2736 participants in network meta-analyses. Despite several statistically significant results in pairwise meta-analyses, only the administration of intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid was associated with statistical and clinical superiority compared with other interventions in the short-term for pain (vs no treatment or placebo: MD, -1.0 visual analog scale [VAS] point; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.5 VAS points; P < .001; vs physiotherapy: MD, -1.1 VAS points; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.5 VAS points; P < .001) and function (vs no treatment or placebo: SMD, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9; P < .001; vs physiotherapy: SMD 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7; P < .001). Subgroup analyses and the network meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of a home exercise program with simple exercises and stretches and physiotherapy (electrotherapy and/or mobilizations) to IA corticosteroid may be associated with added benefits in the mid-term (eg, pain for IA coritocosteriod with home exercise vs no treatment or placebo: MD, -1.4 VAS points; 95% CI, -1.8 to -1.1 VAS points; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this study suggest that the early use of IA corticosteroid in patients with frozen shoulder of less than 1-year duration is associated with better outcomes. This treatment should be accompanied by a home exercise program to maximize the chance of recovery.

Project description:BackgroundDistal radius fractures (DRF) are frequently treated with internal fixation under general anesthesia or a brachial plexus block. Recently, the wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique has been suggested as a method that results in higher patient satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of DRF plating surgery under both the WALANT and balanced anesthesia (BA).MethodsNinety-three patients with DRFs who underwent open reduction and plating were included. Regarding the anesthetic technique, 38 patients received WALANT, while 55 received BA, comprised of multimodal pain control brachial plexus anesthesia with light general support. The patient's overall satisfaction in both groups and the intraoperative numerical rating scale of pain and anxiety (0-10) in the WALANT group were recorded. The peri-operative radiographic parameters were measured; the clinical outcomes, including Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, wrist mobility, and grip strength, were recorded in up to 1-year follow-up. Results presented with a mean difference and 95% confidence intervals and mean ± standard deviation.ResultsThe mean age of patients in the WALANT group was higher than in the BA group (63 ± 17 vs. 54 ± 17, P = 0.005), and there were fewer intra-articular DRF fractures in the WALANT group than in the BA group (AO type A/B/C: 30/3/5 vs. 26/10/19, P = 0.009). The reduction and plating quality were similar in both groups. The clinical outcomes at follow-up were comparable between the two groups, except the WALANT group had worse postoperative 3-month pronation (88% vs. 96%; - 8.0% [ - 15.7 to - 0.2%]) and 6-month pronation (92% vs. 100%; - 9.1% [ - 17.0 to - 1.2%]), and better postoperative 1-year flexion (94% vs. 82%; 12.0% [2.0-22.1%]). The overall satisfaction was comparable in the WALANT and BA groups (8.7 vs. 8.5; 0.2 [ - 0.8 to 1.2]). Patients in the WALANT group reported an injection pain scale of 1.7 ± 2.0, an intraoperative pain scale of 1.2 ± 1.9, and an intraoperative anxiety scale of 2.3 ± 2.8.ConclusionThe reduction quality, functional outcomes, and overall satisfaction were comparable between the WALANT and BA groups. With meticulous preoperative planning, the WALANT technique could be an alternative for DRF plating surgery in selected patients. Trial registration This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUHIRB-E(I)-20210201).

Project description:BackgroundThe ideal treatment of early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment effect, including variability, and feasibility of a multimodal physical therapy program as compared to manipulation under anesthesia.MethodsThis was a prospective feasibility study with a retrospective cohort comparison. Ten consecutive patients (aged 64 ± 9 years, 7 females) with early-stage arthrofibrosis were enrolled 6 weeks after primary total knee arthroplasty and participated in the multimodal physical therapy program. The multimodal physical therapy program consisted of manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, and static progressive splinting delivered over 4 weeks. The outcomes included knee range of motion (ROM), adherence, patient satisfaction, and safety. Data were compared to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients with arthrofibrosis (aged 65 ± 9 years, 20 females) who underwent manipulation under anesthesia followed by physical therapy.ResultsOverall, knee ROM outcomes were similar between multimodal physical therapy (110° ± 14) and manipulation under anesthesia (109° ± 11). Seven out of ten patients achieved functional ROM (≥ 110°) and avoided manipulation under anesthesia with the multimodal physical therapy program. Three out of 10 multimodal physical therapy patients required manipulation under anesthesia secondary to failure to demonstrate progress within 4 weeks of the multimodal physical therapy program. Adherence to the multimodal physical therapy program was 87 ± 9%. The median patient satisfaction with the multimodal physical therapy program was "very satisfied." Safety concerns were minimal.ConclusionThe use of the multimodal physical therapy program is feasible for treating early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty, with 70% of patients avoiding manipulation under anesthesia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the multimodal physical therapy program and to determine the optimal patient selection for the multimodal physical therapy program versus manipulation under anesthesia.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04837872 .

Dataset Information

Comparison of idiopathic, post-trauma and post-surgery frozen shoulder after manipulation under anesthesia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets