Dataset Information

Comparison of three methods for extraction of viral nucleic acids from blood cultures.

ABSTRACT: Reliable nucleic acid extraction techniques for blood specimens are required for the sensitive detection of viral DNA. Standardized procedures for processing blood specimens for the molecular detection of herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus [CMV], herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]) have not been established. Three methods were used to extract DNA from blood specimens from healthy donors and asymptomatic immunocompromised patients: (i) IsoQuick treatment of whole blood, (ii) extraction of the peripheral blood leukocytes by lysis (lysis buffer and proteinase K), and (iii) extraction of peripheral blood leukocytes with phenol-chloroform (sodium docecyl sulfate solution and proteinase K). All blood specimens from 25 healthy blood donors were negative for CMV, herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus nucleic acid sequences, regardless of the extraction method, while three samples (12%) extracted by the lysis technique were positive for EBV DNA. Of 25 blood samples from asymptomatic immunocompromised patients, CMV and EBV each were detected in nine specimens by lysis extraction, four each by IsoQuick and four (CMV) and six (EBV) by the phenol-chloroform method. Our results indicate that the lysis method is optimal for the detection of CMV and EBV DNA sequences by PCR from the leukocytic fraction of blood specimens. DNA of these viruses is frequently present in blood specimens from asymptomatic immunocompromised patients and occasionally from healthy donors.

SUBMITTER: Espy MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC227876 | biostudies-other | 1995 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of three methods for extraction of viral nucleic acids from blood cultures.

Espy M J MJ Patel R R Paya C V CV Smith T F TF

Journal of clinical microbiology 19950101 1

Reliable nucleic acid extraction techniques for blood specimens are required for the sensitive detection of viral DNA. Standardized procedures for processing blood specimens for the molecular detection of herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus [CMV], herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]) have not been established. Three methods were used to extract DNA from blood specimens from healthy donors and asymptomatic immunocompromised patients: (i) IsoQuick treatment of who ...[more]

PMID: 7699063

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNumerous protocols for viral enrichment and genome amplification have been created. However, the direct identification of viral genomes from clinical specimens using next-generation sequencing (NGS) still has its challenges. As a selected viral nucleic acid extraction method may determine the sensitivity and reliability of NGS, it is still valuable to evaluate the extraction efficiency of different extraction kits using clinical specimens directly.ResultsIn this study, we performed qRT-PCR and viral metagenomic analysis of the extraction efficiency of four commonly used Qiagen extraction kits: QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (VRMK), QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (MVSK), RNeasy Mini Kit (RMK), and RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (RPMK), using a mixed respiratory clinical sample without any pre-treatment. This sample contained an adenovirus (ADV), influenza virus A (Flu A), human parainfluenza virus 3 (PIV3), human coronavirus OC43 (OC43), and human metapneumovirus (HMPV). The quantity and quality of the viral extracts were significantly different among these kits. The highest threshold cycle(Ct)values for ADV and OC43 were obtained by using the RPMK. The MVSK had the lowest Ct values for ADV and PIV3. The RMK revealed the lowest detectability for HMPV and PIV3. The most effective rate of NGS data at 67.47% was observed with the RPMK. The other three kits ranged between 12.1-26.79% effectiveness rates for the NGS data. Most importantly, compared to the other three kits the highest proportion of non-host reads was obtained by the RPMK. The MVSK performed best with the lowest Ct value of 20.5 in the extraction of ADV, while the RMK revealed the best extraction efficiency by NGS analysis.ConclusionsThe evaluation of viral nucleic acid extraction efficiency is different between NGS and qRT-PCR analysis. The RPMK was most applicable for the metagenomic analysis of viral RNA and enabled more sensitive identification of the RNA virus genome in respiratory clinical samples. In addition, viral RNA extraction kits were also applicable for metagenomic analysis of the DNA virus. Our results highlighted the importance of nucleic acid extraction kit selection, which has a major impact on the yield and number of viral reads by NGS analysis. Therefore, the choice of extraction method for a given viral pathogen needs to be carefully considered.

Dataset Information

Comparison of three methods for extraction of viral nucleic acids from blood cultures.

Publications

Comparison of three methods for extraction of viral nucleic acids from blood cultures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets