Late results of absorbable pin fixation in the treatment of radial head fractures.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Givissis PK
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2311474 | biostudies-other | 2008 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:The purpose of this technical note and accompanying video is to describe a modified arthroscopic suture fixation technique to treat tibial spine avulsion fractures. Twenty-one patients underwent arthroscopic treatment for tibial spine avulsion with our technique; they were clinically and biomechanically evaluated at 2 years' follow-up and showed optimal clinical and radiographic outcomes. Repair with this arthroscopic technique provides a significant advantage in the treatment of type III and IV fractures of the tibial eminence by obtaining arthroscopic fixation within the substance of the anterior cruciate ligament: suture methods based on the avulsed bone fragment are technically impossible, but sutures through the base of the ligament itself provide secure fixation, reducing the risks of comminution of the fracture fragment and eliminating the time for hardware removal. This arthroscopic technique restores the length and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament and provides a simplified, reproducible method of treating patients, including young patients, with low hardware costs in comparison to sutures using anchors or other hardware.
| S-EPMC3986477 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: We conducted a retrospective study to compare reoperation/conversion rates and costs between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA) in patients with radial head/neck fractures. Methods: We examined the Humana Orthopedic data sets using the PearlDiver Application from January 2007 to June 2016 to identify patients with radial head and neck fractures with and without a concurrent elbow dislocation. Time to revision surgery, odds ratios, and survival curves for reoperations/conversions were calculated comparing ORIF and RHA. Results: A total of 7520 patients were identified who had undergone either ORIF or RHA. Overall, ORIF patients were less likely to undergo a conversion procedure (2.76% vs 7.03%) but more likely to undergo any reoperation (21.36% vs 17.63%) with a higher average cost ($19 688.46 vs $11 626.64). Patients who underwent ORIF without a concurrent elbow dislocation were also less likely to undergo a conversion procedure (2.12% vs 7.24%) but more likely to undergo any reoperation (20.22% vs 16.99%) with a higher average cost ($19 420.21 vs $11 123.61). Patients who underwent ORIF with a concurrent elbow dislocation were more likely to undergo both a conversion procedure (15.86% vs 6.39%) and any reoperation (44.98% vs 19.63%) with a higher average cost per patient ($24 999.62 vs $13 192.00). The average time to reoperation/conversion surgery was less than a year for all patient groups. Conclusions: Overall reoperation rates are high in patients undergoing operative treatment of radial head and neck fractures. RHA is less expensive and has fewer reoperations/conversions in short-term follow-up when compared with ORIF in radial head/neck fracture dislocations of the elbow.
| S-EPMC7818041 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:The differences in the clinical and functional outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) using plate and screws have been systematically synthesized by one meta-analysis. With newer studies being published, an effort to update the earlier meta-analysis is necessary. METHODS:Comprehensive searches were done systematically through PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google scholar databases. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, prospective comparative non-randomized studies, and even studies reporting findings from retrospective chart review were eligible to be included. Statistical analysis was done using STATA version 13.0. GRADE assessment was done to assess the quality of pooled evidence. RESULTS:A total of 9 studies were included. The pooled estimates did not suggest any significant differences in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score [WMD -?0.77; 95% CI, -?3.55, 2.00; I2 = 75.5%], range of movement (ROM) of the metacarpophalangeal joint (o) [WMD 4.44; 95% CI, -?4.19, 13.07; I2 = 86.0%], and grip strength [WMD -?4.63; 95% CI, -?14.52, 5.26; I2 = 86.9%] among the two intervention modalities. No difference was seen in the risk of complications between the two interventions (RR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.57, 1.53; I2 = 31.2%). For all the outcomes, the quality of pooled evidence was judged as low to very low. CONCLUSION:No significant long-term differences were noted in the functional outcomes suggesting that both these techniques are comparable. The choice of modality should be made based on the skills and preference of the surgeon and availability of resources.
| S-EPMC7678208 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although several treatment options for radial head fractures are available, no clear solutions exist. In this study we therefore compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement in treatment of radial head fractures of Mason type III. Cement stem and bipolar radial prosthesis were used to treat 12 fresh cases and two old cases of Mason type III radial head fracture. As a control group, another eight cases of radial head type III fracture were treated with ORIF with cannulated screws and Kirschner (K) wires. The 14 patients who received radial head prosthesis replacement were followed-up for 15.9 months (range 10-27 months). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, we found excellent results in nine cases, good in four, and fair in one. Mean follow-up of the eight cases in the ORIF group was 14 months (range 10-21 months), with good results in one case, fair in four, and poor in three. The result was good or excellent in 92.9% of prosthesis replacement patients and in 12.5% of ORIF patients. This difference is statistically significant (P = 0.0004; Fisher's exact test). We concluded that bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement is better than ORIF in treatment of Mason type III radial head fracture.
| S-EPMC2899229 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLateral humeral condyle fractures are the second most common elbow fracture in children. Displaced and rotated fractures require stabilization and reduction. Kirschner wires (K-wires) are most commonly used in the fixation of these fractures. Here, we introduce a new fixation method that uses an absorbable screw. We aim to determine if it is feasible to treat lateral humeral condyle fractures with an absorbable screw by comparing functional outcomes following absorbable screw fixation vs. K-wire fixation.MethodsBetween May 2007 and September 2010, 86 patients were treated with absorbable screws (43 patients) or K-wire (43 patients). All patients had been diagnosed with lateral condyle fractures that were classified as either Jacob type II (unstable) or III. One absorbable screw (3.5 mm-diameter) was used for fixation in 1 group, while two 1.6 to 1.8 mm K-wires were used in the other group. Patients were followed 6 months about the elbow function according to Broberg and Morrey standard. On 5-7 years, the patients were followed about the carrying angle (valgus deformities and varus deformities), range of motion (flexion loss and extension loss), prominent lateral condyle, symptomatic implants, and fishtail deformity.ResultsAnatomic reduction was achieved in all patients. Each group had one radial nerve injury that were present preoperatively. Nerve function recovered spontaneously within 3 to 4 weeks of surgery in both patients. No patient developed necrosis of the capitulum in both groups. Nine patients in K-wires group and 2 in absorbable screw group developed symptomatic implants (P = .048). On the sixth month, there was no significant difference on elbow function according to Broberg and Morrey standard. On 5 to 7 years (average, 6.7 ± 1.3 years), valgus deformities was 6.8 ± 1.2 vs 5.7 ± 0.8, varus deformities was 7.2 ± 1.5 vs 5.1 ± 1.9, flexion loss was 12.4 ± 2.2 vs 9.5 ± 3.1, extension loss was 11.1 ± 3.1 vs 10.2 ± 2.7, prominent lateral condyle was 27.9% vs 37.2%, fishtail deformity was 7.3% vs 4.9%, no significant difference between these groups.ConclusionsOpen reduction with absorbable screw fixation is feasible and safe for the treatment of lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children.Level of evidenceTherapeutic III.
| S-EPMC6946392 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Unstable distal ulna fractures in the setting of distal radius fractures can present a challenging problem, especially in the elderly population. Operative fixation of the subcapital distal ulna fracture may help to provide a stable ulnar buttress for attempting to reduce the distal radius fracture. Traditional fixation techniques of the distal ulna may prove unsatisfactory in the setting of osteoporosis and comminution. Description The intrafocal pin plate is placed through a small incision distally and uses the curve of the plate to obtain multiple points of fixation within the intramedullary canal. The overhang of the distal aspect of the plate helps to reduce the fracture. The plate is secured using unicortical locking screws in the ulnar head. Patients and Methods The most ideal fracture pattern for this fixation technique is a subcapital distal ulna fracture that is unstable and associated with a distal radius fracture. This technique is contraindicated in ulnar head fractures, segmental fractures with proximal extension, and open fractures with gross contamination as well as in the setting of active infection. Results This technique has provided a stable ulnar buttress and aided in the reduction of grossly unstable distal radius fractures. All of these patients have gone on to union, and we have not experienced a need for plate removal due to pain or soft tissue irritation. Conclusions We have found the intrafocal pin plate to provide both a stable ulnar buttress as well as intramedullary fixation to aid in the fixation of distal radius fractures associated with unstable distal ulna subcapital fractures.
| S-EPMC3922842 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to compare the complete visible surface area of the radial head, neck, and coronoid in the Kaplan and Kocher approaches to the lateral elbow. The hypothesis was that the Kaplan approach would afford greater visibility due to the differential anatomy of the intermuscular planes. METHODS:Ten cadavers were dissected with the Kaplan and Kocher approaches, and the visible surface area was measured in situ using a 3-dimensional digitizer. Six measurements were taken for each approach by 2 surgeons, and the mean of these measurements were analyzed. RESULTS:The mean surface area visible with the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) preserved in the Kaplan approach was 616.6 mm2 in comparison with the surface area of 136.2 mm2 visible in the Kocher approach when the LCL was preserved. Using a 2-way analysis of variance, the difference between these 2 approaches was statistically significant. When the LCL complex was incised in the Kocher approach, the average visible surface area of the Kocher approach was 456.1 mm2 and was statistically less than the Kaplan approach. The average surface area of the coronoid visible using a proximally extended Kaplan approach was 197.8 mm2. CONCLUSIONS:The Kaplan approach affords significantly greater visible surface area of the proximal radius than the Kocher approach.
| S-EPMC6436133 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Intramedullary fixation of comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures has traditionally been employed with satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, pins with smooth surfaces may protrude from the bone and are prone to migration, while some threaded pins are difficult to remove post-operatively. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to develop and evaluate the biomechanical strength of a novel intramedullary Echidna pin device designed to maintain fracture reduction, resist migration and facilitate ease of post-operative removal.Thirty human clavicle specimens were harvested and fractured in a comminuted mid-shaft butterfly configuration. Each specimen was randomly allocated to three surgical repair groups including intramedullary fixation using the Echidna pin and Herbert Cannulated Bone Screw System, as well as plate fixation using bi-cortical locking screws. Using a biomechanical testing apparatus, construct bending and torsional stiffness were measured, as well as ultimate bending strength.There was no significant difference in torsional stiffness and ultimate bending moment between the Echidna pin and Herbert screw repair constructs (p > 0.05); however, the Echidna pin construct demonstrated a significantly greater bending stiffness compared to that of the Herbert screw construct (mean difference 0.55 Nm/deg., p = 0.001). The plate construct demonstrated significantly greater torsional stiffness, bending stiffness and ultimate bending moment compared to those of the Herbert screw and Echidna pin (p < 0.05).An intramedullary Echidna pin device was designed to stabilize comminuted fractures of the clavicle, maintain fracture compression and provide ease of removal post-operatively. Since the results suggest equivalent or superior torsional and bending stability in the Echidna pin compared to that of the Herbert screw, the Echidna pin concept may represent an alternative fixation device to conventional intramedullary screws, nails and pins; however, superior plating using bi-cortical locking screws provides substantially higher construct structural rigidity than intramedullary devices, and may therefore be useful in cases of osteoporotic bone, or where high fracture stability is required.
| S-EPMC5553590 | biostudies-other
Project description:From 1990 to 2005 our department treated nine patients with chronic radial head dislocation by an ulnar osteotomy and indirect reduction by interosseous membrane. The patients varied in age from 2 years and 8 months to 10 years, and the time from the injury to operation ranged from 40 days to 3 years. The range of functional motion and carrying angle was restored in all nine patients, and no complications, such as recurrent dislocation, infection, or neurovascular injury were observed. This technique has proven to be a successful approach to treating such cases, with a low range of complications and good functional results.
| S-EPMC2267559 | biostudies-other
Project description:UnlabelledTo tests the hypothesis that classification and characterization of fractures of the radial head is more accurate with 3D than 2D computed tomography images and radiographs, using a prospective study design with intraoperative inspection as the reference standard. Treating surgeons and first assistants completed a questionnaire assigning a fracture type according to the Broberg and Morrey modification of Mason's classification, evaluating selected fracture characteristics, and electing preferred management based upon radiographs and 2D images alone; then adding 3D-CT; then 3D printed physical models; and finally intra-operative visualization. The addition of the 3D CT and physical models improved the sensitivity for fracture line separating the entire head from the neck, comminution of the radial neck, fracture involving the articular surface, articular fracture gap greater than 2 mm, impacted fracture fragments, greater than 3 articular fragments, and articular fragments judged too small to repair. There were no significant differences in diagnostic performance with the addition of 3D models. The addition of 3D CT and models improved the reliability of Broberg and Morrey classification. We conclude that 3DCT and 3D physical modeling provide more accurate fracture classification and characterization of fracture of the radial head with less proposed variability in treatment. We did not demonstrate a clear advantage for modeling over 3DCT reconstructions.Level of evidenceDiagnostic, Level I.
| S-EPMC4037434 | biostudies-literature