Dataset Information

Long-term followup of vascularized fibular grafting for femoral head necrosis.

ABSTRACT: Vascularized fibular grafting has been used for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and although some reports demonstrate successful short- to mid-term outcomes, long-term results are still unknown. We retrospectively reviewed 135 patients (151 hips) who underwent vascularized fibular grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. One-hundred and ten patients (124 hips) were followed for a minimum 10 years (mean, 13.9 years; range, 10-23.7 years). The mean Harris hip score improved from 72 to 88. At the latest followup, we found improved or unchanged radiographs in 37 of 59 hips initially Stage II hips and 39 of 65 Stage III hips. Thirteen hips (13 patients) (10.5%) failed treatment and underwent total hip arthroplasty. The location and size of the necrotic lesion and the patient's age influenced long-term survival of the graft. Postoperative complications included clawing of the big toe in 17 patients, partial peroneal nerve palsy in two, and superficial infection in two. Subtrochanteric fracture occurred in two hips. The data suggest free vascularized fibular grafting was successful in maintaining joint function and delaying the need for joint replacement procedure. Graft survival was associated with the patient's age and size and location of the lesion but not etiology and stages of the disease.

SUBMITTER: Yoo MC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2311477 | biostudies-other | 2008 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOsteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating condition affecting primarily young patients. Free vascularized fibular grafting (FVFG) may provide a durable means to preserve the femoral head. When used in the precollapse stages of ONFH, this treatment may alter the course of disease.Questions/purposesWe asked: (1) In what percentage of patients does FVFG preserve the femoral head beyond 10 years? (2) When long-term preservation is not achieved, what is the duration of femoral head preservation? (3) Do demographic or etiologic factors predict FVFG survivorship? (4) What long-term improvements in function and activity can be anticipated?MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 61 patients (65 hips) who underwent FVFG for precollapse ONFH. We calculated graft survivorship, SF-12 scores, activity levels, and Harris hip scores. Minimum followup was 10.5 years (mean, 14.4 years; range, 10.5-26 years). Results Forty-nine of 65 hips (75%) had surviving FVFG for at least 10 years. At last followup, 39 of 65 hips (60%) had surviving FVFG, with a mean graft survival time of 15 years (range, 10.5-26.1 years). Twenty-six of the 65 hips with FVFG (40%) underwent conversion to THA at a mean of 8 years postoperatively. Demographic factors, lesion size, additional procedures, and low preoperative function were not associated with changes in graft survivorship. Pain and function were similar in patients with surviving FVFG and patients who had conversion to THA. Patients with surviving FVFG were more likely to engage in impact sports or active events than were patients who had conversion to THA.ConclusionsWhen patients with precollapse ONFH undergo FVFG, the majority have preservation of the hip lasting for greater than 10 years with low levels of pain and reasonable function. In patients who ultimately undergo conversion surgery to THA, the mean duration of hip preservation before conversion is 8 years. We continue to use FVFG for treating patients younger than 50 years with symptomatic, precollapse ONFH.Level of evidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Free vascularized fibula graft (FVFG) techniques have most consistently demonstrated beneficial effects in young patients diagnosed with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (NONFH), and the core track technique (CTT) in particular is the most commonly used technique. As an alternative to CTT, the modified light bulb technique (LBT) has been reported to have a higher success rate. However, its biomechanical outcomes are poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of modified LBT with those of CTT in treating NONFH. METHODS:Two types (C1 and C2) of NONFH finite element models were established on the basis of a healthy subject and the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification system, and the CTT and LBT procedures were simulated in each type of model. The average von Mises stresses and stiffness of the proximal femur were calculated by applying a load of 250% of the body weight on the femoral head to simulate walking conditions. In addition, two patient-specific models were built and simulated under the same boundary conditions to further validate the LBT. RESULTS:In the healthy subject-derived models, both the LBT and CTT resulted in reduced stresses in the weight-bearing area, central femoral head, femoral neck, and trochanteric and subtrochanteric regions and increased structural stiffness after surgery. In the weight-bearing area, the CTT reduced the stress more than the LBT did (36.19% vs 31.45%) for type C1 NONFH and less than the LBT did (23.63% vs 26.76%) for type C2 NONFH. In the patient-specific models, the stiffness and stresses also increased and decreased, respectively, from before to after surgery, which is consistent with the results of healthy subject-derived models. CONCLUSION:The biomechanical effects of the LBT and CTT differ by the JIC type of NONFH. In terms of preventing the collapse of the femoral head, the LBT may be more effective for JIC type C2 NONFH and may be a suitable alternative to the CTT, while for JIC type C1 NONFH, the CTT is still a better choice. Both techniques can improve the biomechanical properties of NONFH by reducing the proximal femoral stress and increasing the structural stiffness.

Dataset Information

Long-term followup of vascularized fibular grafting for femoral head necrosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure