Dataset Information

Protecting a patellar ligament reconstruction after proximal tibial resection: a simplified approach.

ABSTRACT: UNLABELLED: Limb salvage in tumor surgery has encouraged the development of megaprostheses. However, reattaching the ligamentum patellae poses a particular problem: avulsion and/or extensor lag may lead to poor function. We describe a new technique of patellar ligament reconstruction. The technique involves reattachment of the patellar ligament to the tibial tuberosity of the proximal tibial megaprosthesis, which has a porous surface created, and the repair is protected with a cerclage wire through the patella and the prosthesis. In 10 consecutive patients, the range of motion averaged 95 degrees (median, 90 degrees ; range, 70 degrees -120 degrees ), and the mean extension lag averaged 4 degrees (median, 0 degrees ; range, 0 degrees -20 degrees ). We had one case of patellar ligament avulsion. This technique resulted in good quadriceps function and a low incidence of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

SUBMITTER: Titus V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2505243 | biostudies-other | 2008 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To determine whether adding tibial tuberosity medialization to medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction reduces lateral patellar maltracking during a dynamic multidirectional activity and to investigate when medial patellofemoral contact pressures are elevated during daily activities, such as squatting. Methods Seven computational models representing knees with patellar instability, including lateral patellar maltracking, were evaluated following simulated MPFL reconstruction (bisect offset index > .75). Tibial tuberosity medialization was added to MPFL reconstruction for each model. Patellar tracking during multidirectional motion was evaluated by simulating pivot landing. Analysis of pivoting focused on early flexion (5° to 40°). Patellofemoral contact pressures during daily function were evaluated by simulating knee squatting. Data were analyzed with paired comparisons between MPFL reconstruction with and without tuberosity medialization. Results The patella dislocated during pivoting for 2 models with an isolated MPFL reconstruction and for 1 model including tibial tuberosity medialization. Adding tibial tuberosity medialization to MPFL reconstruction significantly decreased bisect offset index by ∼0.1 from 5° to 40° (P < .03). For knee squatting, medializing the tibial tuberosity significantly increased maximum medial contract pressure by ∼0.5 MPa from 30° to 85° (P < .05) but did not significantly influence maximum lateral pressure. Conclusions In this study of simulated multidirectional motion, MPFL reconstruction did not sufficiently constrain the patella for some knees. Adding tibial tuberosity medialization to MPFL reconstruction in these models reduced lateral patellar maltracking during multidirectional motion but increased pressure applied to medial cartilage during squatting. Clinical Relevance After establishing the influence of tibial tuberosity medialization on patellar maltracking for an idealized population, as was done in the current study, future simulation studies can be performed to better determine the anatomical characteristics of patients for whom tibial tuberosity medialization is needed to reduce the risk of postoperative patellar maltracking.

Project description:PurposeTo confirm which method provides lower rate of recurrent instability and superior clinical outcomes.MethodWe searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for the trials involving one intervention or both for patellar instability: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). The postoperative Kujala score, Lysholm score, Tegner scores and the rate of recurrent instability (dislocation or subluxation) were analyzed as the primary clinical outcome parameters in a random or fixed effects meta-analysis.ResultsIn total, 43 articles met inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 2046 patients were analyzed. The overall mean age was 20.3 years (range, 9.5-60.0 years), with a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years (range, 1-8 years). The mean Kujala scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 89.04 and 84.44, respectively. There was significant difference in Kujala scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 4.60, 95%CI: 1.07-8.13; P = 0.01). The mean Lysholm scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 90.59 and 88.14, respectively. There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 2.45, 95%CI: -3.20-8.10; P = 0.40). The mean Tegner scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 5.30 and 4.88, respectively. There was no significant difference in Tegner scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 0.42, 95%CI: -0.39-1.23; P = 0.31). At final follow-up, the rates of recurrent instability in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 3% and 4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rates between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.96-1.02; P = 0.4848).ConclusionMPFLR and MPFLR + TTO are effective and reliable treatments in the setting of patellofemoral instability. MPFLR seems to show a better performance in functional outcomes than MPFLR + TTO. Moreover, their rates of recurrent instability are very low, and no significant difference exists.

Dataset Information

Protecting a patellar ligament reconstruction after proximal tibial resection: a simplified approach.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets