Dataset Information

Impact of duty hour regulations on medical students' education: views of key clinical faculty.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Teaching faculty have valuable perspectives on the impact of residency duty hour regulations on medical students. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to elicit faculty views on the impact of residency duty hour regulations on medical students' educational experience on inpatient medicine rotations. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a National Survey of Key Clinical Faculty (KCF) at 40 internal medicine residency programs affiliated with U.S. medical schools using a random sample stratified by National Institutes of Health funding and program size. MEASUREMENTS: This study measures KCF opinions on the effect of duty hour regulations on students' education. RESULTS: Of 154 KCF targeted, 111 responded (72%). Fifty-two percent of KCF reported worsening in the overall quality of students' education compared to just 2.7% reporting improvement (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis adjusted for gender, academic rank, specialty, and years of teaching experience, faculty who spent >/=15 hours per week teaching were more likely to report worsening in medical students' level of responsibility on inpatient teams [odds ratio (OR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-7.6], ability to follow patients throughout hospitalization (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.3-7.9), ability to develop working relationships with residents (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.2), and the overall quality of students' education (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.4-8.1) compared to faculty who spent less time teaching. CONCLUSION: Key clincal faculty report concerns about the impact of duty hour regulations on aspects of medical students' education in internal medicine. Medical schools and residency programs should identify ways to ensure optimal educational experiences for students within duty hour requirements.

SUBMITTER: Reed DA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2517919 | biostudies-other | 2008 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Concern persists that inflexible duty-hour rules in medical residency programs may adversely affect the training of physicians. METHODS:We randomly assigned 63 internal medicine residency programs in the United States to be governed by standard duty-hour policies of the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) or by more flexible policies that did not specify limits on shift length or mandatory time off between shifts. Measures of educational experience included observations of the activities of interns (first-year residents), surveys of trainees (both interns and residents) and faculty, and intern examination scores. RESULTS:There were no significant between-group differences in the mean percentages of time that interns spent in direct patient care and education nor in trainees' perceptions of an appropriate balance between clinical demands and education (primary outcome for trainee satisfaction with education; response rate, 91%) or in the assessments by program directors and faculty of whether trainees' workload exceeded their capacity (primary outcome for faculty satisfaction with education; response rate, 90%). Another survey of interns (response rate, 49%) revealed that those in flexible programs were more likely to report dissatisfaction with multiple aspects of training, including educational quality (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.73) and overall well-being (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.65). In contrast, directors of flexible programs were less likely to report dissatisfaction with multiple educational processes, including time for bedside teaching (response rate, 98%; odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.49). Average scores (percent correct answers) on in-training examinations were 68.9% in flexible programs and 69.4% in standard programs; the difference did not meet the noninferiority margin of 2 percentage points (difference, -0.43; 95% CI, -2.38 to 1.52; P=0.06 for noninferiority). od Institute and the ACGME; iCOMPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02274818 .). CONCLUSIONS:There was no significant difference in the proportion of time that medical interns spent on direct patient care and education between programs with standard duty-hour policies and programs with more flexible policies. Interns in flexible programs were less satisfied with their educational experience than were their peers in standard programs, but program directors were more satisfied. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blo

Dataset Information

Impact of duty hour regulations on medical students' education: views of key clinical faculty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets