Dataset Information

Quality of care for decompensated heart failure: comparable performance between academic hospitalists and non-hospitalists.

ABSTRACT: Hospitalists improve efficiency, but little information exists regarding whether they impact quality of care.To determine hospitalists' effect on the quality of acute congestive heart failure care.Using data from the Multicenter Hospitalist Study, we retrospectively evaluated quality of care in patients admitted with congestive heart failure who were assigned to hospitalists (n = 120) or non-hospitalists (n = 252) among six academic hospitals.Quality measures included the percentage of patients who had ejection fraction (EF) measurement, received appropriate medications [i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or beta-blockers] at discharge, measures of care coordination (e.g., follow-up within 30 days), testing for cardiac ischemia (e.g., cardiac catheterization), as well as hospital length of stay, cost, and combined 30-day readmissions and mortality.Compared to non-hospitalist physicians, hospitalists' patients had similar rates of EF measurement (85.3% vs. 87.5%; P = 0.57), ACE-I (91.5% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.52), or beta-blocker (46.9% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.57) prescriptions. Multivariable adjustment did not change these findings. Hospitalists' patients had higher odds of 30-day follow-up (adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.44 - 2.93). There were no significant differences between the groups' frequency of cardiac testing, length of stay, costs, or risk for readmission or death by 30-days.Academic hospitalists and non-hospitalists provide similar quality of care for heart failure patients, although hospitalists are paying more attention to longitudinal care. Future efforts to improve quality of care in decompensated heart failure may require attention towards system-level factors.

SUBMITTER: Vasilevskis EE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2517998 | biostudies-other | 2008 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The management of acute decompensated heart failure often requires intensive care. However, the effects of early intensive care unit/coronary care unit admission on activities of daily living (ADL) in acute decompensated heart failure patients have not been precisely evaluated. Thus, we retrospectively assessed the association between early intensive care unit admission and post-discharge ADL performance in these patients. Acute decompensated heart failure patients (New York Heart Association I-III) admitted on emergency between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were selected from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database and divided into intensive care unit/coronary care unit (ICU) and general ward (GW) groups according to the hospitalization type on admission day 1. The propensity score was calculated to create matched cohorts where admission style (intensive care unit/coronary care unit admission) was independent of measured baseline confounding factors, including ADL at admission. The primary outcome was ADL performance level at discharge (post-ADL) defined according to the Barthel index. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and total hospitalization cost (expense). Overall, 12231 patients were eligible, and propensity score matching created 2985 pairs. After matching, post-ADL was significantly higher in the ICU group than in the GW group [mean (standard deviation), GW vs. ICU: 71.5 (35.3) vs. 78.2 (31.2) points, P<0.001; mean difference: 6.7 (95% confidence interval, 5.1-8.4) points]. After matching, length of stay was significantly shorter and expenses were significantly higher in the ICU group than in the GW group. Stratified analysis showed that the patients with low ADL at admission (Barthel index score <60) were the most benefited from early intensive care unit/coronary care unit admission. Thus, early intensive care unit/coronary care unit admission was associated with improved post-ADL in patients with emergency acute decompensated heart failure admission.

Project description:Introduction Hospitalized COVID-19 patients commonly develop pulmonary complications and respiratory insufficiency. Prediction of respiratory deterioration in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is an unmet goal. Aim To assess monitoring of lung fluid status of hospitalized COVID-19 patients to predict respiratory deterioration and prognosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406493. Methods Study population comprised 51 patients hospitalized in Hillel Yaffe Medical Center with COVID-19 infection. Patient lung fluid status was monitored by repeat measurements of the lung impedance (LI), a technique found to be very effective for monitoring and guiding treatment of heart failure patients. Decreasing LI reflects lung fluid accumulation. Clinical and laboratory parameters, chest X-ray and LI level were recorded during hospitalization. Results Of 51 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection (37- men and 14- women, 55.7±12.6 years-old), 46 were discharged alive after successful treatment and of these 27 returned for follow-up evaluation 3-6 months after discharge. In these patients’ admission LI was 72.6±18.4 Ohms (Figure 1) and discharge LI was 83.8±20.7 Ohms, which is 15% higher than the admission value (p< 0.04). LI at the follow up visit was surprisingly low (63.7±15 Ohms), or 31.6% lower than discharge value (p<0.01, figure 1). At follow up, examination of the patients and the NT-proBNP tests were within normal limits. Using our previous experience we calculated the normal (“dry”) LI based on the age, sex, weight, height and anthropology of the chest. The calculated values of the normal LI of patients in time of post-discharge visits were exactly same as measured. Therefore, the LI values of patients in time of hospitalization were higher than their normal values. This finding contrasts with our experience with heart failure patients, where decreasing LI reflects lung fluid accumulation. The possible explanation of this finding is that the lung fluid of COVID-19 patients, containing a high concentration of proteins, has different conductivity properties than the lung fluid of heart failure patients. Conclusions Decreasing of LI level at post-discharge visits of COVID-19 patients 3-6 months after hospitalization differs significantly from the pattern in heart failure patients.

Dataset Information

Quality of care for decompensated heart failure: comparable performance between academic hospitalists and non-hospitalists.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets