Management of combined open fractures of thumb metacarpal and trapezium (surgical tip).
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Pehlivan O
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2526043 | biostudies-other | 2007 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:Fracture of the base of the thumb metacarpal (M1) is a common finding in hand trauma. Closed reduction and K-wire fixation and open reduction-internal fixation are traditional treatments of choice. The arthroscopic assisted technique has been introduced to improve intra-articular fragment reduction and to preserve fragment vascularization and capsular and ligamentous integrity along with joint stability. Indications for arthroscopic assistance are all types of intra-articular fractures or pending malunions involving the base of M1 and/or the trapezium. The aim of this article is to describe the surgical technique used in managing articular fractures of the base of M1, with arthroscopic assistance. Our experience with this technique confirms the advantages of a minimally invasive method that provides articular reduction under direct vision, with limited soft-tissue damage, and allows early rehabilitation (from day 1 after surgery). This technique is extremely valuable for high-demand patients such as manual workers or athletes. The relative disadvantage of the technique is its technical difficulty, which requires experience with small-joint arthroscopy.
| S-EPMC8322571 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Adequate positioning of the hand is a critical step in hand fracture operative repair that can impact both the clinical outcome and the efficiency of the operation. In this paper, we introduce the use of a thermoplastic splint with an added thumb stabilizing component as a means to increase the surgeon's autonomy and to streamline the patient care pathway. The thermoplastic splint is custom fabricated preoperatively by the specialist hand therapist. The splint is used prior, during, and post operation with minimal modification. The thumb component assists maintaining the forearm in a stable pronated position whilst drilling and affixing metal work. This is demonstrated in the video of removal of metal work and open reduction and internal fixation of a metacarpal fracture.
| S-EPMC8342248 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMetacarpal shaft fractures (MSF) are common traumatic hand injuries that usually affect young people of working age. They place a significant burden on healthcare resources and society; however, there is a lack of evidence to guide their treatment. Identifying the most beneficial and cost-efficient treatment will ensure optimisation of care and provide economic value for the National Health Service. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment for MSF in adults.Methods and analysisThis is a multicentre prospective cohort study, with a nested qualitative study consisting of patient interviews and focus groups, and an embedded factorial randomised substudy evaluating the use of text messages to maximise data collection and participant retention. The outcomes of interest include eligibility, recruitment and retention rates, completion of follow-up, evaluation of primary outcome measures, calculation of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for selected outcome measures and establishing the feasibility of data collection methods and appropriate time-points for use in a future trial. Data will be captured using a secure online data management system. Data analyses will be descriptive and a thematic inductive analysis will be used for qualitative data. Minimum clinically important effects for each patient-reported outcome measure will be estimated using anchor-based responsiveness statistics and distribution-based methods.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority (REC reference 20/EE/0124). Results will be made available to patients, clinicians, researchers and the funder via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Social media platforms, local media and feedback from the Patient Advisory Group will be used to maximise circulation of findings to patients and the public.Trial registration numberISRCTN13922779.
| S-EPMC8245430 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundFifth metacarpal fractures are common and comprise a significant proportion of traditional orthopaedic fracture clinic workload. We reviewed the functional outcome and the satisfaction of patients managed with a new protocol that promoted "self-care" and resulted in the discharge of most of these patients from the emergency department with no further follow-up.MethodsA retrospective study was performed of patients discharged with a fifth metacarpal fracture between April 2012 to October 2012. A postal questionnaire was sent to each patient, followed by a telephone call. Patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D, QuickDASH) and patient satisfaction were assessed. Of the 167 patients eligible for the study, 5 were excluded. Of the remaining 162, 64 were uncontactable or declined to participate. The mean follow-up time was 21.6 months (SD 1.9, range 18.1 to 24.7).ResultsThe median EQ-5D health index score was 0.87 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), and the median QuickDASH score was 2.3 (IQR 0 to 6.8). Seventy-nine (80.6 %) patients were satisfied with the outcome of their injury, while 83 (84.9 %) reported being satisfied with the process. There was no difference between those with a fracture or those without a fracture in EQ-5D (p = 0.307) or QuickDASH (p = 0.820).ConclusionFifth metacarpal fractures can be managed effectively through an Emergency Department protocol without any formal orthopaedic follow-up. This pathway lead to excellent patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction. This protocol has reduced unnecessary hospital attendances for patients and increased the time available for clinicians to deal with more challenging injuries.
| S-EPMC4641074 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe treatment of Dubberley type B capitellar fractures, which are frequently complicated, is widely debated. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of Dubberley type B capitellar fractures treated with Herbert screws combined with posterior buttress plates.MethodsSeven men and nine women (aged 30-68 years) with Dubberley type B capitellar fractures were operated on with Herbert screws combined with posterior buttress plates. The patients were classified into Dubberley types IB (seven), IIB (four), and IIIB (five). Complications and bone union were observed, and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).ResultsAll patients were followed up for a mean period of 23.5 months (12-30 months). All fractures healed in 8-14 weeks (mean, 10.5 weeks). No cases of non-union, elbow instability, or avascular necrosis occurred. Degenerative arthritis occurred in 7 (44%) and heterotopic ossification in 11 (69%) patients. The median MEPI score was 92.5 (interquartile range, 85-100) points, with 11 reporting excellent, 3 good, and 2 fair outcomes. The MEPI scores of type IIIB fractures were significantly lower than those of types IB and IIB fractures, while the MEPI scores of type IB and IIB fractures did not differ significantly.ConclusionsDubberley type IIIB capitellar fractures with multiple articular fragments have a poorer prognosis than type IB and IIB fractures. However, Herbert screw fixation combined with posterior metacarpal locking plates is feasible, providing satisfactory recovery of elbow joint function.
| S-EPMC10694941 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Ankle fractures are one of the most common injuries treated by orthopedic surgeons worldwide. However, operative indications, techniques, and reported outcomes following operative fixation vary widely in the literature. This evidence-based review focuses on recent advances in the operative management of ankle fractures including arthroscopic-assisted surgery, deltoid ligament complex repair, expanded indications for posterior malleolus fixation, fibula intramedullary nailing, and dynamic syndesmosis repair.Level of evidenceLevel V, expert opinion.
| S-EPMC8697288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Fractures of the phalangeal or metacarpal bones of the hand are common. Many of these fractures are treated without surgery. However, both conservative and operative management of fractures of the hand can result in stiffness. Stiffness is the most common complication in the management of hand fractures. The key to preventing stiffness is early range of motion exercises. This article challenges many of the current treatment regimens offered to patients with the so-called unstable fractures. The evaluation of the patients' function is the primary factor that should determine the course of conservation versus operative management. X-rays do not demonstrate function and therefore act as an adjunct only to the care of the patient. The goal of treating hand fractures is to restore function. Early motion may not only improve healing but may also hasten the return to normal hand function. The tenets of how to prevent stiffness are described in this review.
| S-EPMC8553242 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Mandibular condylar fractures are among the most common facial fractures and some of the most difficult to manage. Opinions about the management of mandibular condylar fractures differ among surgeons. With the implementation of new technology, an increased understanding of fracture management, and better functional and morphological outcomes reported in the literature, open reduction and internal fixation is becoming many surgeons' preferred choice for the treatment of condylar fractures. Because surgical treatment of such fractures is complex, certain factors must be considered to achieve satisfactory outcomes. In this article, we summarise six key points in the management of mandibular condylar fractures: virtual evaluation of condylar fracture, a suitable surgical approach, good reduction, stable internal fixation, repair of the articular disc, and restoration of the mandibular arch width. We believe that these points will help to improve the prognosis of mandibular condyle fractures.
| S-EPMC7156880 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Open tibial fractures are complex injuries with variable outcomes that significantly impact patients' lives. Surgical debridement is paramount in preventing detrimental complications such as infection and non-union; however, the exact timing of debridement remains a topic of great controversy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between timing of surgical debridement and outcomes such as infection and non-union in open tibial fractures. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to capture studies evaluating the association between timing of initial surgical debridement and infection or non-union, or other reported outcomes. We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed Central, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central and Web of Science electronic databases. Our methodology was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The systematic review included 20 studies with 10,032 open tibial fractures. The overall infection rate was 14.3% (314 out of 2193) and the overall non-union rate 14.2% (116 out of 817). We did not find any statistically significant association between delayed debridement and infection rate (OR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.11; p = 0.23) or non-union rate (OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.15; p = 0.13). These findings did not change when we accounted for the effect of different time thresholds used for defining early and late debridement, nor with the Gustilo-Anderson classification or varying study characteristics. The findings of this meta-analysis support that delayed surgical debridement does not increase the infection or non-union rates in open tibial fracture injuries. Consequently, we propose that a reasonable delay in the initial debridement is acceptable to ensure that optimal management conditions are in place, such that the availability of surgical expertise, skilled staff and equipment are prioritised over getting to surgery rapidly. We recommend changing the standard guidance around timing for performing surgical debridement to 'as soon as reasonably possible, once appropriate personnel and equipment are available; ideally within 24-h'.
| S-EPMC8228778 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: The optimal management of pediatric thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) avulsion fractures remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to elucidate patient outcomes based on initial management and fracture characteristics. Methods: A retrospective study of all patients younger than 18 years of age presenting with a thumb UCL avulsion fracture was performed. Patients were grouped by their initial management. The primary outcome of the study was time to return to full activity. Fractures were characterized by articular surface involvement, displacement, and rotation. Results: Forty-seven patients with thumb UCL avulsion fractures were identified. Ten patients underwent surgery as initial treatment; all healed without complication, with a mean recovery time of 6.2 ± 1.8 weeks. Thirty-seven patients were treated conservatively; although most healed, the recovery time was longer (9.2 ± 8.3 weeks, adjusted hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-5.5). Four cases (11%) required conversion to surgery that all healed without complications. Fractures treated with immobilization alone were significantly smaller, less displaced, and less rotated than those initially treated with surgery; however, 19 fractures that would have met criteria for surgery were treated with immobilization and successfully healed within 7.1 ± 2.9 weeks. Fracture characteristics did not predict which patients would fail conservative treatment or have prolonged recovery times. Conclusions: While surgery provided definitive treatment without delay in recovery, immobilization may not be an unreasonable treatment choice even for patients with large or displaced fractures. In cases where patients failed immobilization, surgery as a second-line treatment had good results.
| S-EPMC7850252 | biostudies-literature