Serum interleukin-6 response to elective total hip replacement surgery.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Minetto MA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2532100 | biostudies-other | 2006 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of switching therapy from low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; enoxaparin) to dabigatran for prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement surgery (THR/TKR).MethodsThis was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, observational, study in patients undergoing THR or TKR who were to receive enoxaparin 40 mg for thromboprophylaxis. Enoxaparin was initiated before or after surgery according to local practice, and was switched to dabigatran 220 mg once daily at a time point chosen by the investigator. The coprimary endpoints were major bleeding events, and the composite of symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality, from last use of enoxaparin to 24 h after last intake of dabigatran.ResultsAltogether, 168 (81 THR, 87 TKR) patients were enrolled, of whom 161 received both enoxaparin and dabigatran, 2 received dabigatran only and 5 received enoxaparin only. The median time of the first dabigatran tablet was 24.0 h after the last LMWH dosage and the median number of days on dabigatran treatment was 36 days. No symptomatic VTE or death occurred during the study. One major bleeding event was seen at the surgical site and required treatment cessation. Three minor bleeding events were observed.ConclusionsIn the normal clinical setting, switching from LMWH to dabigatran in patients who had undergone THR and TKR was safe and effective in preventing VTE. The reported adverse events and serious adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile for dabigatran. Switching from a subcutaneous to an oral anticoagulant may offer greater convenience in the outpatient setting after discharge.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01153698.
| S-EPMC4660827 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveAn assessment of the feasibility of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) combined with nonopioid analgesics and patient controlled analgesia (PCA), oxycodone, in the perioperative anaesthetic management for elective total hip replacement (THR).DesignA randomised, single-center, open-label study.SettingA single hospital. The study was conducted from October 2018 to May 2019.ParticipantsIn total, 109 patients were scheduled for elective total hip replacement.InterventionsPostoperative FICB with 0.375% ropivacaine in conjunction with nonopioid analgesics (paracetamol, metamizole, and pregabalin) and oxycodone as rescue analgesia.MeasurementsPain intensity was measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during rehabilitation, the total dose of postoperative oxycodone required, the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events, patient hospitalisation time, and level of satisfaction. Follow-up period: 48 h.Main resultsA total of 109 patients were randomised into two groups and, of these, 9 were subsequently excluded from the analysis (three conversions to general anaesthesia, two failures to perform FICB, four failures to use the PCA pump). Patients in the FICB group received standard intravenous analgesia with FICB, and those in the control group were managed with standard intravenous analgesia only. Pain level measured with NRS was significantly lower at rest and during rehabilitation in the FICB group. Oxycodone use in the first 48 h was significantly higher in the control group (p < 0.001); additionally, the time to the first dose of rescue analgesia was significantly shorter (p < 0.001). In the control group, there was a higher rate of side effects and a significantly longer hospitalisation time (p < 0.001). Similarly, higher satisfaction with the applied analgesic treatment was noted in the FICB group.ConclusionsFICB in elective THR treatments is an effective form of analgesia, which reduces the need for opioids, the number of complications, the length of hospitalisation, and which ensures a high level of patient satisfaction with the analgesic treatment used.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT04690647.
| S-EPMC8124308 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6485776 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAn ageing population has resulted in a rise in the number of hip and knee replacement surgeries in the UK. The pre-operative pathway is plagued with issues causing long delays and cancellations. Virtual healthcare technologies have a growing evidence base to help solve these issues. One problem of implementing these technologies is the resistance to change mentality from healthcare professionals. By getting their opinions on the place of these technologies within the pre-operative pathway, a united front can be formed to help deliver change.MethodsSixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders within the orthopaedic pre-operative pathway at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. General topics included the different technologies that could be used within the pathway, their uses and associated benefits and problems. Interviews were audio-recorded, before being manually transcribed and then analysed to form categories and themes.ResultsVarious uses, benefits and problems were identified by healthcare professionals for each modality of technology. E-forms were seen as a high reward, low-risk intervention. Remote patient monitoring and teleconsultations had their bonuses, but feasibility was a primary concern. Web-based interventions were seen as an intervention of the past, whereas virtual reality was seen as perhaps being ahead of its time. M-health was very positively viewed due to its all-encompassing nature. Digital illiteracy emerged as a consistent problem for most technologies.ConclusionsCurrent literature, the results from this study and technology trends within society highlight both M-health and E-forms as the 2 most promising virtual healthcare technologies for use in the pre-operative pathway for orthopaedics. Areas such as pre-operative assessment, triaging and prehabilitation are prime candidates for virtual intervention. Future research should also consider including patient opinions on any proposed interventions, as well as taking into account barriers to implementation.
| S-EPMC7667783 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveIn recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the contribution of genetic factors to variability in patient pain threshold and the efficacy of pain management. One of the genes implicated in pain pathology and treatment response is interleukin 6 (IL6). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between IL6 (rs1800795: -174G>C) and opioid requirements in patients after total hip replacement (THR).MethodsA total of 196 patients eligible for the study (126 women, 70 men) were subjected to THR. The THR procedure was performed using spinal anaesthesia after implementing routine peri-operative monitoring. After the procedure each patient was individually observed, and the patient-specific chart of dynamic changes in pain perception was recorded, using the five-level Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). The multimodal analgesic treatment after THR was defined by the operating surgeons after considering indications and contraindications to the use of different groups of drugs (opioid and non-opioid analgesics). Postoperative pain was controlled by the patient-controlled analgesia method and VRS during the day-time, as well as night-time nurse-controlled analgesia. All medication adjustments were recorded in the individual patient files. In the case of moderate pain intensity (VRS-assessed), a patient was administered the non-opioid analgesic drug, and for high intensity pain the opioid. The analysis of pain relief therapy included information on the drugs applied, mode of dosing (single or multiple), daily dose, route of administration, and drug refusal due to the absence of pain recorded each study day, i.e. on the day of surgery and recovery in the postoperative room (day 0), and then daily from day 1 to day 6. Polymorphism rs1800795:G>C in the promoter region of the IL6 gene (-174G>C) was determined using the PCR-RFLP method.ResultsThe patients carrying at least one IL6 -174G allele (GG homozygote and GC heterozygote) were administered opioids significantly more often on days 0 (p = 0.0029), 3 (p = 0.019) and 4 (p = 0.031) after surgery compared with CC homozygous patients. Those patients also required a significantly higher opioid dose on days 3 (p = 0.029) and 4 (p = 0.030). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of the -174G allele was an independent factor predisposing patients to the administration of opioids during the first 24 h [p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 7.1, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.17-22.7], on day 3 (p = 0.01, OR 2.79, 95 % CI 1.25-6.26) and day 4 (p = 0.01, OR = 2.61, 95 % CI 1.17-5.79).ConclusionThe presence of the G allele IL6 gene (-174G>C) polymorphism was found to be an independent factor predisposing to a higher dose and more frequent administration of opioids in the first days after total hip replacement.
| S-EPMC4956693 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Our aim was to identify which patients are likely to stay in hospital longer following total hip replacement surgery. Longitudinal, observational study used routinely collected data. Data were collected from an NHS Trust in South-West England between 2016 and 2019. 2352 hip replacement patients had complete data and were included in analysis. Three measures of length of stay were used: a count measure of number of days spent in hospital, a binary measure of ≤7 days/>7 days in hospital and a binary measure of remaining in hospital when medically fit for discharge. The mean length of stay was 5.4 days following surgery, with 18% in hospital for more than 7 days, and 11% staying in hospital when medically fit for discharge. Longer hospital stay was associated with older age (OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.08), being female (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.81) and more comorbidities (OR=3.52, 95% CI 1.45 to 8.55) and shorter length of stay with not having had a recent hospital admission (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.60). Results were similar for remaining in hospital when medically fit for discharge, with the addition of an association with highest socioeconomic deprivation (OR=2.08, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.16). Older, female patients with more comorbidities and from more socioeconomically deprived areas are likely to remain in hospital for longer following surgery. This study produced regression models demonstrating consistent results across three measures of prolonged hospital stay following hip replacement surgery. These findings could be used to inform surgery planning and when supporting patient discharge following surgery.
| S-EPMC11340698 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Afabicin (formerly Debio 1450, AFN-1720) is a prodrug of afabicin desphosphono (Debio 1452, AFN-1252), a novel antibiotic in development which targets the staphylococcal enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) and exhibits selective potent antibacterial activity against staphylococcal species, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus As part of clinical development in bone and joint infections, a distribution study in bone was performed in 17 patients who underwent elective hip replacement surgery. Patients received 3 doses of 240 mg afabicin orally (every 12 h) at various time points before surgery. Afabicin desphosphono concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in plasma, cortical bone, cancellous bone, bone marrow, soft tissue, and synovial fluid collected during surgery at 2, 4, 6, or 12 h after the third afabicin dose. The study showed good penetration of afabicin desphosphono into bone tissues, with mean area under the curve ratios for cortical bone-, cancellous bone-, bone marrow-, soft tissue-, and synovial fluid-to-total plasma concentrations of 0.21, 0.40, 0.32, 0.35, and 0.61, respectively. When accounting for the free fraction in plasma (2%) and synovial fluid (9.4%), the mean ratio was 2.88, which is indicative of excellent penetration and which showed that the afabicin desphosphono concentration was beyond the MIC90 of S. aureus over the complete dosing interval. These findings, along with preclinical efficacy data, clinical efficacy data for skin and soft tissue staphylococcal infection, the availability of both intravenous and oral formulations, and potential advantages over broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of staphylococcal bone or joint infections, support the clinical development of afabicin for bone and joint infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02726438.).
| S-EPMC6395911 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Total hip replacement (THR) is a surgical procedure indicated for patients affected by severe hip osteoarthritis. Although this technique has proved to be effective in relieving pain and restoring function, gait limitations may persist following this procedure. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate gait kinematics after THR and compare the results with those of the pre-operative state and with healthy control individuals. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched until December 2019. Methodological quality and internal validity score of each study were assessed using the PEDro and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales. In all, ten studies met our inclusion criteria. Following THR, statistically significant improvements were seen in dynamic hip and knee range of motion of both the affected and the contralateral limb, single-limb support time symmetry, step length, stride length, walking speed and gait pattern. However, deficits were observed in all the previous parameters, as well as in hip adduction angle in comparison with healthy subjects. In conclusion, gait patterns improve after THR in comparison with the pre-operative state, although there are deficits relative to healthy individuals.
| S-EPMC7573021 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Sport rehabilitation is a reimbursable intervention assisting reintegration and self-help. In this study, we measured the effects of sport rehabilitation on muscle strength around the hip joint at 1 year after surgery, as well as cardiopulmonary endurance performance and stability of stance, in patients who had undergone a first implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis (total hip replacement, THR) as a treatment for osteoarthritis of the hip. METHODS:160 patients were randomly allotted either to an intervention group with intensive sport rehabilitation for the first year or to a control group. At three time points (baseline, six and twelve months after surgery), measurements were made of muscular strength around the hip joint (with isokinetic dynamometry), stability of stance, and endurance performance. The primary endpoint was the change in strength of the hip extensors, abductors, flexors, and adductors at twelve months after surgery. RESULTS:With respect to the primary endpoint, the results were not significantly better in patients who had received sport rehabilitation than in those who had not. At one year, the patients in the intervention group had less pain as measured by the WOMAC pain score (p = 0.023), though the size of this effect was small (r = 0.27). Health-related quality of life was higher in the intervention group at six months, albeit with a small effect size (p = 0.036, r = 0.25); this was no longer demonstrable at one year. The other parameters studied displayed no significant changes. CONCLUSION:This trial did not demonstrate any significant benefit of sports rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients who had undergone total hip replacement. Nonetheless, positive trends after the intervention were seen in some parameters. The unexpectedly high dropout rate had been underestimated in the planning phase of the trial; further trials with larger numbers of patients should be performed.
| S-EPMC6384522 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInpatient satisfaction with care is a standard indicator of the quality of care delivered during hospitalization. Total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) for osteoarthritis (OA) are among the most successful orthopaedic interventions having a positive impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim was to evaluate the effect of satisfaction shortly after hospital discharge on 1-month, 6-month and 1-year Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) scores for OA patients after THR and TKR, controlling for patient characteristics, clinical presentation and preoperative SF-36 scores.MethodsA multicenter prospective cohort study recruited 231 patients with OA scheduled to receive THR or TKR. Satisfaction was assessed by the Patients Judgment of Hospital Quality (PJHQ) questionnaire and HRQoL by the SF-36 questionnaire. Linear models for repeated measures assessed the relation between satisfaction (scores were dichotomized) and postoperative SF-36 scores.ResultsOf 231 participants, 189 were followed up 12 months after discharge (mean age 69 SD = 8; 42.6% male). The mean length of hospital stay was 13.5 (SD = 4) days. After adjustment for preoperative SF-36 scores, sociodemographic and clinical patient characteristics, satisfied patients (PJHQ score > 70) had higher SF-36 scores 1 year after surgery than did less-satisfied patients. Admission, medical care, and nursing and daily care scores mainly predicted bodily pain, mental health, social functioning, vitality and general health scores of the SF-36.ConclusionBesides being a quality-of-care indicator, immediate postoperative patient satisfaction with care may bring a new insight into clinical practice, as a predictor of self-perceived health status after surgery.
| S-EPMC2795735 | biostudies-literature