Dataset Information

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

ABSTRACT: Avoidance of admission through provision of hospital care at home is a scheme whereby health care professionals provide active treatment in the patient's home for a condition that would otherwise require inpatient treatment in an acute care hospital. We sought to compare the effectiveness of this method of caring for patients with that type of in-hospital care.We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EconLit databases and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group register from the earliest date in each database until January 2008. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated a service providing an alternative to admission to an acute care hospital. We excluded trials in which the program did not offer a substitute for inpatient care. We performed meta-analyses for trials for which the study populations had similar characteristics and for which common outcomes had been measured.We included 10 randomized trials (with a total of 1327 patients) in our systematic review. Seven of these trials (with a total of 969 patients) were deemed eligible for meta-analysis of individual patient data, but we were able to obtain data for only 5 of these trials (with a total of 844 patients [87%]). There was no significant difference in mortality at 3 months for patients who received hospital care at home (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.09, p = 0.15). However, at 6 months, mortality was significantly lower for these patients (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.87, p = 0.005). Admissions to hospital were greater, but not significantly so, for patients receiving hospital care at home (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.96-2.33, p = 0.08). Patients receiving hospital care at home reported greater satisfaction than those receiving inpatient care. These programs were less expensive than admission to an acute care hospital ward when the analysis was restricted to treatment actually received and when the costs of informal care were excluded.For selected patients, avoiding admission through provision of hospital care at home yielded similar outcomes to inpatient care, at a similar or lower cost.

SUBMITTER: Shepperd S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2621299 | biostudies-other | 2009 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Shepperd Sasha S Doll Helen H Angus Robert M RM Clarke Mike J MJ Iliffe Steve S Kalra Lalit L Ricauda Nicoletta Aimonio NA Tibaldi Vittoria V Wilson Andrew D AD

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 20090101 2

<h4>Background</h4>Avoidance of admission through provision of hospital care at home is a scheme whereby health care professionals provide active treatment in the patient's home for a condition that would otherwise require inpatient treatment in an acute care hospital. We sought to compare the effectiveness of this method of caring for patients with that type of in-hospital care.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EconLit databases and the Cochrane Effective Practice and ...[more]

PMID: 19153394

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsTo synthesize quantitative evidence on levels of dignity during acute hospital admission and identify barriers and facilitators to patients' dignity or dignified care from the perspective of hospitalized patients. The secondary aim was to examine the relationship between dignity and demographic, clinical and psychological characteristics of patients.DesignA systematic review based on the protocol of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for reporting systematic reviews.Data sourcesFive electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, AgeLine) were searched in February 2021, followed by backward-forward searching using Web of Science and Scopus databases.Review methodsPotentially eligible articles were scrutinized by two reviewers. Articles that met the eligibility criteria were appraised for quality using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Two reviewers extracted data for the review and resolved differences by consensus.ResultsOut of 3052 potentially eligible studies, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Levels of dignity for hospitalized patients vary widely across geographic locations. Patients' dignity is upheld when healthcare professionals communicate effectively, maintain their privacy, and provide dignity therapy. Patients' perceptions of dignity were, in some studies, reported to be associated with demographic (e.g. age, marital status, gender, employment, educational status), clinical (e.g. hospitalization, functional impairment, physical symptoms) and psychological (e.g. depression, anxiety, demoralization, coping mechanisms) variables whilst other studies did not observe such associations.ConclusionPatients in acute care settings experience mild to a severe loss of dignity across different geographic locations. Patients' dignity is influenced by several demographic, clinical and psychological characteristics of patients.ImpactThe findings of the review support impetus for improvement in dignified care for hospitalized patients, addressing factors that facilitate or impede patients' dignity. Measures aimed at alleviating suffering, fostering functional independence and addressing patients' psychosocial needs can be used to promote dignity.

Project description:ImportanceUnderstanding the patient's perspective of their care transition process from hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) to home may highlight gaps in care and inform system improvements.ObjectiveTo gather data about patients' care transition experiences and factors associated with follow-up appointment completion.Design, setting, and participantsA survey tool was developed with input from patient advisors and organizations participating in a collaborative quality initiative. Seventeen hospitals, 12 practitioner organizations, and 6 SNFs in Michigan collaborated to identify shared patients who were aged 18 years and older, had a working telephone number, recently returned home or to an assisted living facility with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or after an SNF stay. Using consecutive sampling, interviewers collected 5 telephone surveys per month. From October 2018 to December 2019, patients or caregivers were surveyed via telephone 8 to 12 days after discharge from a hospital or SNF. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to January 2022.ExposureCare transition experiences.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was to identify patient-perceived gaps during care transition experiences, including postdischarge follow-up.ResultsOn the basis of pilot data, the response rate was estimated at 34%, yielding 1257 surveys. Of 1257 survey respondents (mean [SD] age, 70 [12.94] years for 968 patients for whom age data was available), 654 (52%) were female; 829 (74%) were White, 250 (22%) were Black or African American, and 40 (4%) were another race. Eleven percent of patients reported not receiving a telephone number to call for postdischarge questions. Nearly 80% of patients (977 patients) received a follow-up telephone call, and most found it valuable. Twenty percent of patients (255 patients) reported at least 1 social determinant of health issue. Lack of transportation was associated with reduced likelihood of completing a follow-up visit, decreasing the odds of completing a follow-up by nearly 70% (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53; P < .001). Compared with other patient groups, Black patients were less likely to report completing a postdischarge follow-up visit (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67; P < .001) or to receive prescribed medical equipment (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 1.30-13.83; P = .02).Conclusions and relevanceAn examination of patient discharge experiences from a hospital or SNF identified inconsistencies in care transition processes, social determinants of health issues needing to be addressed after discharge, and racial disparities between patients who attend follow-up appointments. Physicians should be aware of these findings and their consequences for patient experiences.

Project description:BackgroundResearch shows that feeding back patient-reported outcome information to clinicians and/or patients could be associated with improved care processes and patient outcomes. Quantitative syntheses of intervention effects on oncology patient outcomes are lacking.ObjectiveTo determine the effects of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) feedback intervention on oncology patient outcomes.Data sourcesWe identified relevant studies from 116 references included in our previous Cochrane review assessing the intervention for the general population. In May 2022, we conducted a systematic search in five bibliography databases using predefined keywords for additional studies published after the Cochrane review.Study selectionWe included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of PROM feedback intervention on processes and outcomes of care for oncology patients.Data extraction and synthesisWe used the meta-analytic approach to synthesize across studies measuring the same outcomes. We estimated pooled effects of the intervention on outcomes using Cohen's d for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval for dichotomous data. We used a descriptive approach to summarize studies which reported insufficient data for a meta-analysis.Main outcome(s) and measures(s)Health-related quality of life (HRQL), symptoms, patient-healthcare provider communication, number of visits and hospitalizations, number of adverse events, and overall survival.ResultsWe included 29 studies involving 7071 cancer participants. A small number of studies was available for each metanalysis (median = 3 studies, ranging from 2 to 9 studies) due to heterogeneity in the evaluation of the trials. We found that the intervention improved HRQL (Cohen's d = 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.34), mental functioning (Cohen's d = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.26), patient-healthcare provider communication (Cohen's d = 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.62), and 1-year overall survival (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86). The risk of bias across studies was considerable in the domains of allocation concealment, blinding, and intervention contamination.Conclusions and relevanceAlthough we found evidence to support the intervention for highly relevant outcomes, our conclusions are tempered by the high risk of bias relating mainly to intervention design. PROM feedback for oncology patients may improve processes and outcomes for cancer patients but more high-quality evidence is required.

Project description:ImportanceUse of postacute care is common and costly in the United States, but there is significant uncertainty about whether the choice of postacute care setting matters. Understanding these tradeoffs is particularly important as new alternative payment models push patients toward lower-cost settings for care.ObjectiveTo investigate the association of patient outcomes and Medicare costs of discharge to home with home health care vs discharge to a skilled nursing facility.Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective cohort study used Medicare claims data from short-term acute-care hospitals in the United States and skilled nursing facility and home health assessment data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, on Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from the hospital to home with home health care or to a skilled nursing facility. To address the endogeneity of treatment choice, an instrumental variables approach used the differential distance between the beneficiary's home zip code and the closest home health agency and the closest skilled nursing facility as an instrument.ExposuresReceipt of postacute care at home vs in a skilled nursing facility.Main outcomes and measuresReadmission within 30 days of hospital discharge, death within 30 days of hospital discharge, improvement in functional status during the postacute care episode, and Medicare payment for postacute care and total payment for the 60-day episode.ResultsA total of 17 235 854 hospitalizations (62.2% women and 37.8% men; mean [SD] age, 80.5 [7.9] years) were discharged either to home with home health care (38.8%) or to a skilled nursing facility (61.2%) during the study period. Discharge to home was associated with a 5.6-percentage point higher rate of readmission at 30 days compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (95% CI, 0.8-10.3; P = .02). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates (-2.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.8-10.3; P = .12) or improved functional status (-1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -12.0 to 8.2; P = .71). Medicare payment for postacute care was significantly lower for those discharged to home compared with those discharged to a skilled nursing facility (-$5384; 95% CI, -$6932 to -$3837; P < .001), as was total Medicare payment within the first 60 days after admission (-$4514; 95% CI, -$6932 to -$3837; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceAmong Medicare beneficiaries eligible for postacute care at home or in a skilled nursing facility, discharge to home with home health care was associated with higher rates of readmission, no detectable differences in mortality or functional outcomes, and lower Medicare payments.

Dataset Information

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Publications

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets