Dataset Information

Evidence-based assessment of pediatric pain.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To conduct an evidence-based review of pediatric pain measures. METHODS:Seventeen measures were examined, spanning pain intensity self-report, questionnaires and diaries, and behavioral observations. Measures were classified as "Well-established," "Approaching well-established," or "Promising" according to established criteria. Information was highlighted to help professionals evaluate the instruments for particular purposes (e.g., research, clinical work). RESULTS:Eleven measures met criteria for "Well-established," six "Approaching well-established," and zero were classified as "Promising." CONCLUSIONS:There are a number of strong measures for assessing children's pain, which allows professionals options to meet their particular needs. Future directions in pain assessment are identified, such as highlighting culture and the impact of pain on functioning. This review examines the research and characteristics of some of the commonly used pain tools in hopes that the reader will be able to use this evidence-based approach and the information in future selection of assessment devices for pediatric pain.

SUBMITTER: Cohen LL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2639489 | biostudies-other | 2008 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evidence-based assessment of pediatric pain.

Cohen Lindsey L LL Lemanek Kathleen K Blount Ronald L RL Dahlquist Lynnda M LM Lim Crystal S CS Palermo Tonya M TM McKenna Kristine D KD Weiss Karen E KE

Journal of pediatric psychology 20071117 9

<h4>Objective</h4>To conduct an evidence-based review of pediatric pain measures.<h4>Methods</h4>Seventeen measures were examined, spanning pain intensity self-report, questionnaires and diaries, and behavioral observations. Measures were classified as "Well-established," "Approaching well-established," or "Promising" according to established criteria. Information was highlighted to help professionals evaluate the instruments for particular purposes (e.g., research, clinical work).<h4>Results</h ...[more]

PMID: 18024983

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:There is an increasing number of pediatric urgent care centers that are largely staffed by pediatric residency graduates. It is unclear if pediatric residency adequately prepares a physician to fully and successfully provide care in an urgent care setting. The goal of this study is to conduct an assessment of urgent care directors' perceptions of recent pediatric residency graduates' preparedness to successfully provide pediatric urgent care after graduation. METHODS:This is a 2018 cross-sectional survey of all pediatric emergency medicine division chiefs in the United States and all pediatric urgent care directors who are members of the Society for Pediatric Urgent Care. An electronic survey was distributed consisting of eight multiple choice questions regarding perceived preparedness and knowledge gaps of recent pediatric residency graduates for independent practice in urgent care. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results and qualitative data were analyzed via an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS:Forty-two percent (65/154) of surveys were completed. No respondents believed that a recent pediatric residency graduate would be adequately prepared to independently practice in a pediatric urgent care and 81% of respondents recommended some additional training. Most respondents described this training as important (46%) or very important (35%). Most respondents recommended between 6 months and 1 year as the appropriate amount of time to achieve competency. CONCLUSIONS:Despite the growing number pediatric residency graduates staffing pediatric urgent care centers, the majority of surveyed pediatric emergency medicine division chiefs and pediatric urgent care directors do not think that pediatric residency adequately prepares graduates to successfully provide urgent care to pediatric patients. We recommend further exploration of gaps in knowledge of recent pediatric residency graduates as a next step towards developing systems for further training for pediatric residency graduates to gain competency in urgent care management.

Project description:Despite the various different candidate genetic polymorphisms of potential clinical relevance, there is not enough understanding of the inter?individual variability in analgesic administration. The cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype is thought to be one of the most studied. The aim of the present evidence?based review was to determine if there is now sufficient evidence to make clinical recommendations based on a specific genomic profile. The data sources utilized were as follows: PubMed (NLM) database, Evidence Based Medicine Guidelines and Google. Research on clinical guidance standards, systematic reviews, meta?analyses and clinical trials, published prior to January 2018, were evaluated in English, using the MeSH terms 'cancer pain', 'polymorphism', 'genetic' and 'gene polymorphism'. To assess the level of evidence, the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy of the American Family Physician was applied. From the initial search, 12 systematic reviews and/or meta?analyses, 5 clinical trials and 10 guidelines were selected. The results indicated that genetic variation of µ?opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) may contribute to inter?individual differences in morphine consumption with recommendation grade A for OPRM A118G single nucleotide polymorphism (rs1799971). Polymorphisms associated with the metabolization process of morphine and other opioid drugs are very relevant in opioid titration and ethnic subgroup differences which have to be taken into account (particularly, for the recommendation grade A for the CYP2D6 polymorphism). In human studies, the catechol?O?methyl transferase (COMT) genotype affects the efficacy of opioids in acute and chronic pain under different settings, with recommendation grade B to the COMT single nucleotide polymorphism rs4680 (Val/Met). Finally, polymorphisms of the ATP?binding cassette family of efflux transporters were highlighted. Consistent data on pain polymorphisms is now widely available; however, these results have had very little impact on clinical guidelines and daily oncologist practice. Persisting pain, side effects of grade 3 (NCI?CTCAE v4.0) and breakthrough pain with more than 4 episodes/day should be considered the criteria for pain multidisciplinary team discussions and for polymorphism screening.

Dataset Information

Evidence-based assessment of pediatric pain.

Publications

Evidence-based assessment of pediatric pain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets