Dataset Information

Characterizing pulmonary blood flow distribution measured using arterial spin labeling.

ABSTRACT: The arterial spin labeling (ASL) method provides images in which, ideally, the signal intensity of each image voxel is proportional to the local perfusion. For studies of pulmonary perfusion, the relative dispersion (RD, standard deviation/mean) of the ASL signal across a lung section is used as a reliable measure of flow heterogeneity. However, the RD of the ASL signals within the lung may systematically differ from the true RD of perfusion because the ASL image also includes signals from larger vessels, which can reflect the blood volume rather than blood flow if the vessels are filled with tagged blood during the imaging time. Theoretical studies suggest that the pulmonary vasculature exhibits a lognormal distribution for blood flow and thus an appropriate measure of heterogeneity is the geometric standard deviation (GSD). To test whether the ASL signal exhibits a lognormal distribution for pulmonary blood flow, determine whether larger vessels play an important role in the distribution, and extract physiologically relevant measures of heterogeneity from the ASL signal, we quantified the ASL signal before and after an intervention (head-down tilt) in six subjects. The distribution of ASL signal was better characterized by a lognormal distribution than a normal distribution, reducing the mean squared error by 72% (p < 0.005). Head-down tilt significantly reduced the lognormal scale parameter (p = 0.01) but not the shape parameter or GSD. The RD increased post-tilt and remained significantly elevated (by 17%, p < 0.05). Test case results and mathematical simulations suggest that RD is more sensitive than the GSD to ASL signal from tagged blood in larger vessels, a probable explanation of the change in RD without a statistically significant change in GSD. This suggests that the GSD is a useful measure of pulmonary blood flow heterogeneity with the advantage of being less affected by the ASL signal from tagged blood in larger vessels.

SUBMITTER: Henderson AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2836845 | biostudies-other | 2009 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVR), an important predictor of ischaemic events and a prognostic factor for patients with moyamoya disease (MMD), can be assessed by measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after administration of acetazolamide (ACZ). Often, a single CBF measurement is performed between 5 and 20 min after ACZ injection. Assessment of the temporal response of the vasodilation secondary to ACZ administration using several repeated CBF measurements has not been studied extensively. Furthermore, the high standard deviations of the group-averaged CVRs reported in the current literature indicate a patient-specific dispersion of CVR values over a wide range. This study aimed to assess the temporal response of the CBF and derived CVR during ACZ challenge using arterial spin labeling in patients with MMD. Eleven patients with MMD were included before or after revascularisation surgery. CBF maps were acquired using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling before and 5, 15, and 25 min after an intravenous ACZ injection. A vascular territory template was spatially normalized to patient-specific space, including the bilateral anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries. CBF increased significantly post-ACZ injection in all vascular territories and at all time points. Group-averaged CBF and CVR values remained constant throughout the ACZ challenge in most patients. The maximum increase in CBF occurred most frequently at 5 min post-ACZ injection. However, peaks at 15 or 25 min were also present in some patients. In 68% of the affected vascular territories, the maximum increase in CBF did not occur at 15 min. In individual cases, the difference in CVR between different time points was between 1 and 30% points (mean difference 8% points). In conclusion, there is a substantial variation in CVR between different time points after the ACZ challenge in patients with MMD. Thus, there is a risk that the use of a single post-ACZ measurement time point overestimates disease progression, which could have wide implications for decision-making regarding revascularisation surgery and the interpretation of the outcome thereof. Further studies with larger sample sizes using multiple CBF measurements post-ACZ injection in patients with MMD are encouraged.

Project description:Background and Purpose- Imaging is frequently used to select acute stroke patients for intra-arterial therapy. Quantitative cerebral blood flow can be measured noninvasively with arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral blood flow levels in the contralateral (unaffected) hemisphere may affect capacity for collateral flow and patient outcome. The goal of this study was to determine whether higher contralateral cerebral blood flow (cCBF) in acute stroke identifies patients with better 90-day functional outcome. Methods- Patients were part of the prospective, multicenter iCAS study (Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke) between 2013 and 2017. Consecutive patients were enrolled after being diagnosed with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. Inclusion criteria were ischemic anterior circulation stroke, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ?1, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score ?2, onset-to-imaging time <24 hours, with imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging and arterial spin labeling. Patients were dichotomized into high and low cCBF groups based on median cCBF. Outcomes were assessed by day-1 and day-5 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and day-30 and day-90 modified Rankin Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test whether cCBF predicted good neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) at 90 days. Results- Seventy-seven patients (41 women) met the inclusion criteria with median (interquartile range) age of 66 (55-76) yrs, onset-to-imaging time of 4.8 (3.6-7.7) hours, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 13 (9-20). Median cCBF was 38.9 (31.2-44.5) mL per 100 g/min. Higher cCBF predicted good outcome at day 90 (odds ratio, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.4-14.7]; P=0.01), after controlling for baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume, and intra-arterial therapy. Conclusions- Higher quantitative cCBF at baseline is a significant predictor of good neurological outcome at day 90. cCBF levels may inform decisions regarding stroke triage, treatment of acute stroke, and general outcome prognosis. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02225730.

Project description:Background and purposeThe arterial spin-labeling method for CBF assessment is widely available, but its accuracy is not fully established. We investigated the accuracy of a whole-brain arterial spin-labeling technique for assessing the mean parenchymal CBF and the effect of aging in healthy volunteers. Phase-contrast MR imaging was used as the reference method.Materials and methodsNinety-two healthy volunteers were included: 49 young (age range, 20-30 years) and 43 elderly (age range, 65-80 years). Arterial spin-labeling parenchymal CBF values were averaged over the whole brain to quantify the mean pCBF(ASL) value. Total CBF was assessed with phase-contrast MR imaging as the sum of flows in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries, and subsequent division by brain volume returned the pCBF(PCMRI) value. Accuracy was considered as good as that of the reference method if the systematic difference was less than 5 mL/min/100 g of brain tissue and if the 95% confidence intervals were equal to or better than ±10 mL/min/100 g.ResultspCBF(ASL) correlated to pCBF(PCMRI) (r = 0.73; P < .001). Significant differences were observed between the pCBF(ASL) and pCBF(PCMRI) values in the young (P = .001) and the elderly (P < .001) volunteers. The systematic differences (mean ± 2 standard deviations) were -4 ± 14 mL/min/100 g in the young subjects and 6 ± 12 mL/min/100 g in the elderly subjects. Young subjects showed higher values than the elderly subjects for pCBF(PCMRI) (young, 57 ± 8 mL/min/100 g; elderly, 54 ± 7 mL/min/100 g; P = .05) and pCBF(ASL) (young, 61 ± 10 mL/min/100 g; elderly, 48 ± 10 mL/min/100 g; P < .001).ConclusionsThe limits of agreement were too wide for the arterial spin-labeling method to be considered satisfactorily accurate, whereas the systematic overestimation in the young subjects and underestimation in the elderly subjects were close to acceptable. The age-related decrease in parenchymal CBF was augmented in arterial spin-labeling compared with phase-contrast MR imaging.

Dataset Information

Characterizing pulmonary blood flow distribution measured using arterial spin labeling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets