Dataset Information

Latent class analysis is useful to classify pregnant women into dietary patterns.

ABSTRACT: Empirical dietary patterns are derived predominantly using principal components, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), or cluster analysis. Interestingly, latent variable models are less used despite their being more flexible to accommodate important characteristics of dietary data and despite dietary patterns being recognized as latent variables. Latent class analysis (LCA) has been shown empirically to be more appropriate to derive dietary patterns than k-means clustering but has not been compared yet to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In this article, we derived dietary patterns using EFA, CFA, and LCA on food items, tested how well the classes from LCA were characterized by the factors from CFA, and compared participants' direct classification from LCA on food items compared with 2 a posteriori classifications from factor scores. Methods were illustrated with the Pregnancy, Infection and Nutrition Study, North Carolina, 2000-2005 (n = 1285 women). From EFA and CFA, we found that food items were grouped into 4 factors: Prudent, Prudent with coffee and alcohol, Western, and Southern. From LCA, pregnant women were classified into 3 classes: Prudent, Hard core Western, and Health-conscious Western. There was high agreement between the direct classification from LCA on food items and the classification from the 2-step LCA on factor scores [?=0.70 (95% CI = 0.66, 0.73)] despite factors explaining only 25% of the total variance. We suggest LCA on food items to study the effect for mutually exclusive classes and CFA to understand which foods are eaten in combination. When interested in both benefits, the 2-step classification using LCA on previously derived factor scores seems promising.

SUBMITTER: Sotres-Alvarez D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2981007 | biostudies-other | 2010 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Latent class analysis is useful to classify pregnant women into dietary patterns.

Sotres-Alvarez Daniela D Herring Amy H AH Siega-Riz Anna Maria AM

The Journal of nutrition 20101020 12

Empirical dietary patterns are derived predominantly using principal components, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), or cluster analysis. Interestingly, latent variable models are less used despite their being more flexible to accommodate important characteristics of dietary data and despite dietary patterns being recognized as latent variables. Latent class analysis (LCA) has been shown empirically to be more appropriate to derive dietary patterns than k-means clustering but has not been compare ...[more]

PMID: 20962151

Similar Datasets

Project description:Heterogeneity of injury severity among children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) classified by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) makes comparisons across research cohorts, enrollment in clinical trials, and clinical predictions of outcomes difficult. The present study uses latent class analysis (LCA) to distinguish severity subgroups from a prospective cohort of 433 children 2.5-15 years of age with TBI who were recruited from two level 1 pediatric trauma centers. Indicator variables available within 48 h post-injury including emergency department (ED) GCS, hospital motor GCS, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), Rotterdam Score, hypotension in the ED, and pre-hospital loss of consciousness, intubation, seizures, and sedation were evaluated to define subgroups. To understand whether latent class subgroups were predictive of clinically meaningful outcomes, the Pediatric Injury Functional Outcome Scale (PIFOS) at 6 and 12 months, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function at 12 months, were compared across subgroups. Then, outcomes were examined by GCS (primary) and AIS (secondary) classification alone to assess whether LCA provided improved outcome prediction. LCA identified four distinct increasing severity subgroups (1-4). Unlike GCS classification, mean outcome differences on PIFOS at 6 months showed decreasing function across classes. PIFOS differences relative to the lowest latent class (LC1) were: LC2 2.27 (0.83, 3.72), LC3 3.99 (1.88, 6.10), and LC4 11.2 (7.04, 15.4). Differences in 12 month outcomes were seen between the most and least severely injured groups. Differences in outcomes in relation to AIS were restricted to the most and less severely injured at both time points. This study distinguished four latent classes that are clinically meaningful, distinguished a more homogenous severe injury group, and separated children by 6-month functional outcomes better than GCS alone. Systematic reporting of these variables would allow comparisons across research cohorts, potentially improve clinical predictions, and increase sensitivity to treatment effects in clinical trials.

Project description:BackgroundBeverages, especially sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), have been increasingly subject to policies aimed at reducing their consumption as part of measures to tackle obesity. However, precision targeting of policies is difficult as information on what types of consumers they might affect, and to what degree, is missing. We fill this gap by creating a typology of beverage consumers in Great Britain (GB) based on observed beverage purchasing behaviour to determine what distinct types of beverage consumers exist, and what their socio-demographic (household) characteristics, dietary behaviours, and weight status are.Methods and findingsWe used cross-sectional latent class analysis to characterise patterns of beverage purchases. We used data from the 2016 GB Kantar Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) panel, a large representative household purchase panel of food and beverages brought home, and restricted our analyses to consumers who purchase beverages regularly (i.e., >52 l per household member annually) (n = 8,675). Six categories of beverages were used to classify households into latent classes: SSBs; diet beverages; fruit juices and milk-based beverages; beer and cider; wine; and bottled water. Multinomial logistic regression and linear regression were used to relate class membership to household characteristics, self-reported weight status, and other dietary behaviours, derived from GB Kantar FMCG. Seven latent classes were identified, characterised primarily by higher purchases of 1 or 2 categories of beverages: 'SSB' (18% of the sample; median SSB volume = 49.4 l/household member/year; median diet beverage volume = 38.0 l), 'Diet' (16%; median diet beverage volume = 94.4 l), 'Fruit & Milk' (6%; median fruit juice/milk-based beverage volume = 30.0 l), 'Beer & Cider' (7%; median beer and cider volume = 36.3 l; median diet beverage volume = 55.6 l), 'Wine' (18%; median wine volume = 25.5 l; median diet beverage volume = 34.3 l), 'Water' (4%; median water volume = 46.9 l), and 'Diverse' (30%; diversity of purchases, including median SSB volume = 22.4 l). Income was positively associated with being classified in the Diverse class, whereas low social grade was more likely for households in the classes SSB, Diet, and Beer & Cider. Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) was more prevalent in the class Diet (41.2%, 95% CI 37.7%-44.7%) despite households obtaining little energy from beverages in that class (17.9 kcal/household member/day, 95% CI 16.2-19.7). Overweight/obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2) was above average in the class SSB (66.8%, 95% CI 63.7%-69.9%). When looking at all groceries, households from the class SSB had higher total energy purchases (1,943.6 kcal/household member/day, 95% CI 1,901.7-1,985.6), a smaller proportion of energy from fruits and vegetables (6.0%, 95% CI 5.8%-6.3%), and a greater proportion of energy from less healthy food and beverages (54.6%, 95% CI 54.0%-55.1%) than other classes. A greater proportion of energy from sweet snacks was observed for households in the classes SSB (18.5%, 95% CI 18.1%-19.0%) and Diet (18.8%, 95% CI 18.3%-19.3%). The main limitation of our analyses, in common with other studies, is that our data do not include information on food and beverage purchases that are consumed outside the home.ConclusionsAmongst households that regularly purchase beverages, those that mainly purchased high volumes of SSBs or diet beverages were at greater risk of obesity and tended to purchase less healthy foods, including a high proportion of energy from sweet snacks. These households might additionally benefit from policies targeting unhealthy foods, such as sweet snacks, as a way of reducing excess energy intake.

Dataset Information

Latent class analysis is useful to classify pregnant women into dietary patterns.

Publications

Latent class analysis is useful to classify pregnant women into dietary patterns.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets