Managing the difficult airway in craniomaxillofacial trauma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lock R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3052686 | biostudies-other | 2010 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2023. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2023 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .
| S-EPMC10029275 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIdentifying a potentially difficult airway is crucial both in anaesthesia in the operating room (OR) and non-operation room sites. There are no guidelines or expert consensus focused on the assessment of the difficult airway before, so this expert consensus is developed to provide guidance for airway assessment, making this process more standardized and accurate to reduce airway-related complications and improve safety.MethodsSeven members from the Airway Management Group of the Chinese Society of Anaesthesiology (CSA) met to discuss the first draft and then this was sent to 15 international experts for review, comment, and approval. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is used to determine the level of evidence and grade the strength of recommendations. The recommendations were revised through a three-round Delphi survey from experts.ResultsThis expert consensus provides a comprehensive approach to airway assessment based on the medical history, physical examination, comprehensive scores, imaging, and new developments including transnasal endoscopy, virtual laryngoscopy, and 3D printing. In addition, this consensus also reviews some new technologies currently under development such as prediction from facial images and voice information with the aim of proposing new research directions for the assessment of difficult airway.ConclusionsThis consensus applies to anesthesiologists, critical care, and emergency physicians refining the preoperative airway assessment and preparing an appropriate intubation strategy for patients with a potentially difficult airway.
| S-EPMC10432292 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9805752 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by a coronavirus that is transmitted primarily via aerosol, droplets or direct contact. This may place anesthetists at higher risk of infection due to their frequent involvement in aerosol-generating airway interventions. Many anesthethetic COVID-19 guidelines have emerged, whose underlying management principles include minimizing aerosol contamination and protecting healthcare workers. These guidelines originate from Australia and New Zealand, Canada, China, India, Italy, Korea, Singapore, the United States and the United Kingdom. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients may require airway interventions, and difficult tracheal intubation secondary to laryngeal edema has been reported. Pre-pandemic difficult airway guidelines include those from Canada, France, Germany, India, Japan, Scandinavia, the United States and the United Kingdom. These difficult airway guidelines require modifications in order to align with the principles of the anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines. In turn, most of the anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines do not, or only briefly, discuss an airway strategy after failed tracheal intubation. Our article identifies and compares pre-pandemic difficult airway guidelines with the recent anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines. We combine the principles from both sets of guidelines and explain the necessary modifications to the airway guidelines, to form a failed tracheal intubation airway strategy in the COVID-19 patient. Valuing, and a greater understanding of, these differences and modifications may lead to greater adherence to the new COVID-19 guidelines.
| S-EPMC7341705 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Aim:To describe telenurses' strategies for managing difficult calls. Background:Telenursing is a growing and complex area and places great demands on telenurses' knowledge and skills and on their ability to communicate and listen. To become emotionally concerned is central to telenurses' experiences of difficult calls. Design:A descriptive qualitative study. Methods:The data were collected during February 2017 through individual interviews with 19 telenurses at call centres and primary healthcare centres. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis. Result:The analysis revealed an essential strategy illustrated by the theme "to be calm and secure in themselves." Further categories described telenurses' strategies to manage difficult calls, labelled as: "to show commitment and interest," "to have structure in the call and use support systems," "to pause the call" and "to reflect on difficult calls." The results show that telenurses need multiple strategies to help them to navigate difficult calls.
| S-EPMC7544854 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objective:The existing evidence separately correlates morbid obesity with difficult intubation and bronchospasm. However, there is a lack of data on whether anaesthesia provider manipulations during difficult intubation contribute to an increased ratio of bronchospasm in these patients. Methods:This is a retrospective analysis of data prospectively taken from 50 morbidly obese patients involved in a previously published study. A possible difficult intubation was preoperatively investigated by recording the following specific physical examination indices: Mallampati and Cormack-Lehane (CL) classifications, cervical spine mobility (CSM), thyromental distance (Td) and patients' ability to open their mouth (mouth opening). Bronchospasm was clinically detected by auscultation and confirmed by measuring peak airway pressures during mechanical ventilation. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for data analysis, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test as applicable. Results:Different physical examination prognostic indices, including Mallampati and CL scales (p<0.001; the CSM excluded -p=0.790), showed that they are related to difficult intubation. Bronchospasm not attributable to difficult intubation was observed in six obese patients. Conclusion:Patients with morbid obesity constitute an increased relative risk group as far as difficult intubation is concerned, particularly if preoperative findings support a relationship between the two variables examined. In our study, difficult intubation and the concomitant use of special equipment and manipulations did not contribute to an increased rate of bronchospasm in obese patients, but in view of the lack of data, a large number of more sophisticated studies are required to elucidate such an assumption.
| S-EPMC6101711 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAccurate prediction of the difficult airway (DA) could help to prevent catastrophic consequences in emergency resuscitation, intensive care, and general anesthesia. Until now, there is no nomogram prediction model for DA based on ultrasound assessment. In this study, we aimed to develop a predictive model for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) and difficult laryngoscopy (DL) using nomogram based on ultrasound measurement. We hypothesized that nomogram could utilize multivariate data to predict DTI and DL.MethodsA prospective observational DA study was designed. This study included 2254 patients underwent tracheal intubation. Common and airway ultrasound indicators were used for the prediction, including thyromental distance (TMD), modified Mallampati test (MMT) score, upper lip bite test (ULBT) score temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility and tongue thickness (TT). Univariate and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) stepwise logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors of DTI and DL. Nomograms were constructed to predict DL and DTL based on the AIC stepwise analysis results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of the nomograms.ResultsAmong the 2254 patients enrolled in this study, 142 (6.30%) patients had DL and 51 (2.26%) patients had DTI. After AIC stepwise analysis, ULBT, MMT, sex, TMJ, age, BMI, TMD, IID, and TT were integrated for DL nomogram; ULBT, TMJ, age, IID, TT were integrated for DTI nomogram. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.933 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.912-0.954] and 0.974 (95% CI, 0.954-0.995) for DL and DTI, respectively.ConclusionNomograms based on airway ultrasonography could be a reliable tool in predicting DA.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR-RCS-14004539 ), registered on 13th April 2014.
| S-EPMC8756724 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeNumerous clinical guidelines are available for management of the unanticipated difficult airway. It is unclear if practice recommendations are endorsed on regional, local, or individual levels. The objective of this observational study was to examine local and regional use of airway guidelines by anesthesiologists within a hospital partnership in Southwestern Ontario.MethodsUsing a paper survey, distributed locally to consultant and trainee anesthesiologists in a tertiary hospital, we examined individual clinical and educational practices regarding guideline use in airway management. Respondents were asked to report which published guideline they used for unanticipated airway difficulty. The effectiveness of dissemination of the national Canadian airway guidelines-the Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) Difficult Airway Guidelines-was examined. We invited anesthesia department heads within the regional hospital partnership to complete an electronic survey investigating departmental adoption of guidelines.ResultsThe response rate was 70% locally (79/112 anesthesiologists) and 52% regionally (11/21 department heads). Approximately 80% (64/79) of respondents reported using a formal clinical guideline if unanticipated difficulty with airway management was encountered. Seventy-two per cent of respondents (57/79) were aware of the published CAFG guidelines. Approximately 30% (16/51) of consultant anesthesiologists reported using the CAFG guidelines in clinical practice. Within the hospital partnership, 36% (4/11) of departments formally endorsed use of a specific airway management guideline.ConclusionsDespite widespread awareness of the national CAFG Difficult Airway Guidelines, they are not widely adopted in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to explore barriers to adoption of airway management guidelines for both individual anesthesiologists and anesthesia departments.
| S-EPMC8259770 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivesProcedural simulation training for difficult airway management offers acquisition opportunities. The hypothesis was that 3 hours of procedural simulation training for difficult airway management improves: acquisition, behavior, and patient outcomes as reported 6 months later.MethodsThis prospective comparative study took place in two medical universities. Second-year residents of anesthesiology and intensive care from one region participated in 3h procedural simulation (intervention group). No intervention was scheduled for their peers from the other region (control). Prior to simulation and 6 months later, residents filled-out the same self-assessment form collecting experience with different devices. The control group filled-out the same forms simultaneously. The primary endpoint was the frequency of use of each difficult airway management device within groups at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included modifications of knowledge, skills, and patient outcomes with each device at 6 months. Intervention cost assessment was provided.Results44 residents were included in the intervention group and 16 in the control group. No significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint. In the intervention group, improvement of knowledge and skills was observed at 6 months for each device, and improvement of patient outcomes was observed with the use of malleable intubation stylet and Eschmann introducer. No such improvement was observed in the control group. Estimated intervention cost was 406€ per resident.ConclusionsA 3h procedural simulation training for difficult airway management did not improve the frequency of use of devices at 6 months by residents. However, other positive effects suggest exploring the best ratio of time/acquisition efficiency with difficult airway management simulation. CLINICALTRIALS.Gov identifierNCT02470195.
| S-EPMC9391856 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to analyze position-specific morphological changes of the upper airway and to further assess the impact of these changes in difficult airway during intubation.MethodsThis observational comparative study included two groups (n = 20 patients/group): Group A had normal airway and Group B had difficult airway. Data obtained from two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging were imported to Mimics V20.0 software for processing. We then reconstructed three-dimensional models of upper airway filling in patients in the supine and maximum extension position based on the imaging data. Those models were projected on coronal, sagittal, and horizontal planes to investigate multiple morphological features. We measured the surface area, radial length, and corner angle of the projected areas.ResultsGroup A had larger upper airway filling volumes compared to Group B The volumes for the supine position were 6,323.83 ± 156.06 mm3 for Group A and 5,336.22 ± 316.13 mm3 for Group B (p = 0.003). The volumes the maximum extension position were 9,186.58 ± 512.61 mm3 for Group A and 6,735.46 ± 794.63 mm3 for Group B (p = 0.003). Airway volume increased in the upper airway filling model as the body position varied from the supine to maximum extension position (Group A: volume increase 2,953.75 ± 524.6 mm3, rate of change 31%; Group B: volume increase 1,632.89 ± 662.66 mm3, rate of change 25%; p = 0.052).ConclusionThe three-dimensional reconstruction model developed in this study was used to digitally quantify morphological features of a difficult airway and could be used as a novel airway management assessment tool.
| S-EPMC9632020 | biostudies-literature