Dataset Information

Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

ABSTRACT: Variation of subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles with ambient pressure is numerically investigated for non-invasive monitoring of organ-level blood pressure. Previously, several contrast microbubbles both in vitro and in vivo registered approximately linear (5-15 dB) subharmonic response reduction with 188 mm Hg change in ambient pressure. In contrast, simulated subharmonic response from a single microbubble is seen here to either increase or decrease with ambient pressure. This is shown using the code BUBBLESIM for encapsulated microbubbles, and then the underlying dynamics is investigated using a free bubble model. The ratio of the excitation frequency to the natural frequency of the bubble is the determining parameter--increasing ambient pressure increases natural frequency thereby changing this ratio. For frequency ratio below a lower critical value, increasing ambient pressure monotonically decreases subharmonic response. Above an upper critical value of the same ratio, increasing ambient pressure increases subharmonic response; in between, the subharmonic variation is non-monotonic. The precise values of frequency ratio for these three different trends depend on bubble radius and excitation amplitude. The modeled increase or decrease of subharmonic with ambient pressure, when one happens, is approximately linear only for certain range of excitation levels. Possible reasons for discrepancies between model and previous experiments are discussed.

SUBMITTER: Katiyar A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3087400 | biostudies-other | 2011 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To investigate if the right ventricular (RV) systolic and left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressures can be obtained noninvasively using the subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique with Sonazoid microbubbles. Materials and Methods Individuals scheduled for a left and/or right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board-approved clinical trial from 2017 to 2020. A standard-of-care catheterization procedure was performed by advancing fluid-filled pressure catheters into the LV and aorta (n = 25) or RV (n = 22), and solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheters into the LV and aorta in a subset of participants (n = 18). Study participants received an infusion of Sonazoid microbubbles (GE HealthCare), and SHAPE data were acquired using a validated interface developed on a SonixTablet (BK Medical) US scanner, synchronously with the pressure catheter data. A conversion factor, derived using cuff-based pressure measurements with a SphygmoCor XCEL PWA (ATCOR) and subharmonic signal from the aorta, was used to convert the subharmonic signal into pressure values. Errors between the pressure measurements obtained using the SHAPE technique and pressure catheter were compared. Results The mean errors in pressure measurements obtained with the SHAPE technique relative to those of the fluid-filled pressure catheter were 1.6 mm Hg ± 1.5 [SD] (P = .85), 8.4 mm Hg ± 6.2 (P = .04), and 7.4 mm Hg ± 5.7 (P = .09) for RV systolic, LV minimum diastolic, and LV end-diastolic pressures, respectively. Relative to the measurements with the solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheter, the mean errors in LV minimum diastolic and LV end-diastolic pressures were 7.2 mm Hg ± 4.5 and 6.8 mm Hg ± 3.3 (P ≥ .44), respectively. Conclusion These results indicate that SHAPE with Sonazoid may have the potential to provide clinically relevant RV systolic and LV diastolic pressures. Keywords: Ultrasound-Contrast, Cardiac, Aorta, Left Ventricle, Right Ventricle ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT03245255 © RSNA, 2024.

Project description:Background The current standard for assessing the severity of portal hypertension is the invasive acquisition of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). A noninvasive US-based technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) could reduce risk and enable routine acquisition of these pressure estimates. Purpose To compare quantitative SHAPE to HVPG measurements to diagnose portal hypertension in participants undergoing a transjugular liver biopsy. Materials and Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional trial conducted at two hospitals between April 2015 and March 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02489045). This trial enrolled participants who were scheduled for transjugular liver biopsy. After standard-of-care transjugular liver biopsy and HVPG pressure measurements, participants received an infusion of a US contrast agent and saline. During infusion, SHAPE data were collected from a portal vein and a hepatic vein, and the difference was compared with HVPG measurements. Correlations between data sets were determined by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and statistical significance between groups was determined by using the Student t test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of SHAPE. Results A total of 125 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 12; 80 men) with complete data were included. Participants at increased risk for variceal hemorrhage (HVPG ≥12 mm Hg) had a higher mean SHAPE gradient compared with participants with lower HVPGs (0.79 dB ± 2.53 vs -4.95 dB ± 3.44; P < .001), which is equivalent to a sensitivity of 90% (13 of 14; 95% CI: 88, 94) and a specificity of 80% (79 of 99; 95% CI: 76, 84). The SHAPE gradient between the portal and hepatic veins was in good overall agreement with the HVPG measurements (r = 0.68). Conclusion Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation is an accurate noninvasive technique for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kiessling in this issue.

Project description:Purpose To determine whether three-dimensional subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) and subharmonic imaging can help predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 17 women (age range, 45-70 years) scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer underwent ultrasonography (US) immediately before therapy and at completion of 10%, 60%, and 100% of chemotherapy. All patients provided written informed consent. At each examination, radiofrequency data were collected from SHAPE and subharmonic imaging during infusion of a US contrast agent. Maximum-frequency magnitude and mean intensity were calculated for SHAPE and subharmonic imaging. The signal differences in the tumor relative to the surrounding area were compared with the final treatment response by using the Student t test. Results Four patients left the study, and data from two patients were discarded because of technical problems. Eight patients completed the entire imaging protocol, and an additional three patients dropped out after the imaging session at completion of 10% of chemotherapy as a result of disease progression (these patients were counted as nonresponders). Patients' imaging outcomes consisted of six responders (tumor volume reduction >90%) and five partial responders or nonresponders. The results at completion of 10% of therapy showed that the subharmonic signal increased more in the tumor than in the surrounding area for responders than in partial responders or nonresponders (mean ± standard deviation, 3.23 dB ± 1.41 vs -0.88 dB ± 1.46 [P = .001], respectively, for SHAPE and 1.32 dB ± 0.73 vs -0.82 dB ± 0.88 [P = .002], respectively, for subharmonic imaging). Moreover, three patients whose tumor measurements initially increased were correctly predicted to be responders with SHAPE and subharmonic imaging after completion of 10% of therapy. Conclusion SHAPE and subharmonic imaging have the potential to help predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer as early as completion of 10% of therapy, albeit on the basis of a small sample size. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Dataset Information

Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets