Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Thank you reviewers - CytoJournal 2011.

ABSTRACT: CytoJournal, with its continued contribution of scientific cytopathology literature to the public domain under open access (OA) charter, thanks its dedicated peer reviewers for devoting significant efforts, time, and resources during 2011. The abstracts of poster-platform submissions to the 59(th) Annual Scientific Meeting (November 2011) of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) in Baltimore, MD, USA, were peer reviewed by the ASC Scientific Program Committee.

SUBMITTER: Shidham VB 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3263011 | biostudies-other | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Unknown OUR REVIEWERS
| S-EPMC9151094 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Appreciation to peer reviewers in 2023.
| S-EPMC10834264 | biostudies-literature
Unknown The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers.
| S-EPMC4448813 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Statistical Guidance for Reviewers of Toxicologic Pathology.
| S-EPMC6063795 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
| S-EPMC6310661 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Thank You, Reviewers and E-Letter Contributors!
| S-EPMC7939713 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Thank you to our reviewers of 2021
| S-EPMC8803350 | biostudies-literature
Unknown A thank you to DMM's peer reviewers
| S-EPMC6398495 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Thank You, Reviewers and E-Letter Contributors
| S-EPMC9328704 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.
| S-EPMC4019638 | biostudies-literature