The influence of optimal medical treatment on the 'obesity paradox', body mass index and long-term mortality in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: To assess whether the obesity paradox persists in the long term and to study the effect of optimal medical treatment on this phenomenon.A retrospective cohort study.A tertiary care centre in Rotterdam.From January 2000 to December 2005, 6332 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease were categorised into underweight (body mass index (BMI)<18.5), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9) and obese (>30).Mortality.Cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction.Optimal medical treatment was more common in obese patients as compared with normal weight patients (85% vs 76%; p<0.001). At a mean of 6.1 years, overweight and obese patients had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86 and HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.87, respectively). After adjusting for OMT in the multivariate analysis, BMI did not remain an independent predictor of long-term mortality (HR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.12 and HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.43, respectively).BMI is inversely related to long-term mortality in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with a normal BMI are on suboptimal medical treatment when compared with those with a high BMI. A more optimal medical treatment in the obese group may explain the observed improved outcome in these patients.
SUBMITTER: Schenkeveld L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3277907 | biostudies-other | 2012
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
ACCESS DATA