Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Margolis RH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3292602 | biostudies-other | 2012 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:A previous report [Margolis and Stiepan (2012). "Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 1221-1225] described a reliable, inexpensive, acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators. As a follow up to that report harmonic distortion measurements were made with the standard electromechanical method and the acoustic method using five Radioear B71 vibrators and one Radioear B81 prototype vibrator. Lower distortion was seen for measurements made with the acoustic method compared to the electromechanical method and for the Radioear B81 vibrator compared to the Radioear B71 vibrator.
| S-EPMC3689822 | biostudies-other
Project description:Integrating quantitative morphological and qualitative molecular methods to analyze soil nematode community responses to plant range expansion
| PRJEB24755 | ENA
Project description:ObjectiveSingle-ear hearing measurements, such as better-ear, worse-ear or left/right ear, are often used as outcomes in auditory research, yet, measurements in the two ears of the same individual are often strongly but not perfectly correlated. We propose a both-ear method using the Generalized Estimating Equation approach for analysis of correlated binary ear data to evaluate determinants of ear-specific outcomes that includes information from both ears of the same individual.DesignWe first theoretically evaluated bias in odds ratio (OR) estimates based on worse-ear and better-ear hearing outcomes. A simulation study was conducted to compare the finite sample performances of single-ear and both-ear methods in logistic regression models. As an illustrative example, the single-ear and both-ear methods were applied to estimate the association of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension adherence scores with hearing threshold elevation among 3135 women, aged 48 to 68 years, in the Nurses' Health Study II.ResultsBased on statistical theories, the worse-ear and better-ear methods could bias the OR estimates. The simulation results led to the same conclusion. In addition, the simulation results showed that the both-ear method had satisfactory finite sample performance and was more efficient than the single-ear method. In the illustrative example, the confidence intervals of the estimated ORs for the association of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension scores and hearing threshold elevation using the both-ear method were narrower, indicating greater precision, than for those obtained using the other methods.ConclusionsThe worse-ear and better-ear methods may lead to biased estimates, and the left/right ear method typically results in less-efficient estimates. In certain settings, the both-ear method using the Generalized Estimating Equation approach for analyses of audiometric data may be preferable to the single-ear methods.
| S-EPMC9398921 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study examined outstanding issues of sensitivity calibration methods for ultrasonic and acoustic emission transducers and provides workable solutions based on physically measureable quantities, laser-based displacement measurement in particular. This leads to mutually consistent determination of transmitting and receiving sensitivities of sensors and transducers. Methods of circumventing problems of extraneous vibrations on free transmitters are used, giving the foundation for face-to-face calibration methods. Working on many ultrasonic and acoustic emission transducers, their receiving and transmitting sensitivities are found to be always different, while their ratios exhibit unexpected similarity. This behavior is attributed to monopolar pulse generation and bipolar received signals due to electrical charge transfer during elastic wave motion and reflection on the back face. This is verified through a quantitative piezoelectric sensing experiment. Displacement vs. velocity calibration terminology is clarified, redefining the "V/µbar" reference for contact sensor calibration. With demonstrated differences in the transmitting and receiving sensitivities of transducers, the requirement of the Hill-Adams equation invalidates the basic premise of the currently formulated reciprocity calibration methods for acoustic emission transducers. In addition, the measured reciprocity parameter for the case of through-transmission significantly deviates from the approximate theoretical prediction. It is demonstrated that three methods provide reliable sensor calibration results that are complimentary among them.
| S-EPMC5456930 | biostudies-other
Project description:Measurement and calibration of an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) using a histogram-based method requires a large volume of data and a long test duration, especially for a high resolution ADC. A fast and accurate calibration method for pipelined ADCs is proposed in this research. The proposed calibration method composes histograms through the outputs of each stage and calculates error sources. The digitized outputs of a stage are influenced directly by the operation of the prior stage, so the results of the histogram provide the information of errors in the prior stage. The composed histograms reduce the required samples and thus calibration time being implemented by simple modules. For 14-bit resolution pipelined ADC, the measured maximum integral non-linearity (INL) is improved from 6.78 to 0.52 LSB, and the spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR) and signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio (SNDR) are improved from 67.0 to 106.2dB and from 65.6 to 84.8dB, respectively.
| S-EPMC4466524 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Calibration of the gain and digital conversion factor of an EMCCD is necessary for accurate photon counting. We present a new method to quickly calibrate multiple gain settings of an EMCCD camera. Acquiring gain-series calibration data and analyzing the resulting images with the EMCCD noise model more accurately estimates the gain response of the camera. Furthermore, we develop a method to compare the results from different calibration approaches. Gain-series calibration outperforms all other methods in this self-consistency test.
| S-EPMC8443689 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There is direct evidence of risks at moderate and high levels of radiation dose for highly radiogenic cancers such as leukaemia and thyroid cancer. For many cancer sites, however, it is necessary to assess risks via extrapolation from groups exposed at moderate and high levels of dose, about which there are substantial uncertainties. Crucial to the resolution of this area of uncertainty is the modelling of the dose-response relationship and the importance of both systematic and random dosimetric errors for analyses in the various exposed groups. It is well recognised that measurement error can alter substantially the shape of this relationship and hence the derived population risk estimates. Particular attention has been devoted to the issue of shared errors, common in many datasets, and particularly important in occupational settings. We propose a modification of the regression calibration method which is particularly suited to studies in which there is a substantial amount of shared error, and in which there may also be curvature in the true dose response. This method can be used in settings where there is a mixture of Berkson and classical error. In fits to synthetic datasets in which there is substantial upward curvature in the true dose response, and varying (and sometimes substantial) amounts of classical and Berkson error, we show that the coverage probabilities of all methods for the linear coefficient [Formula: see text] are near the desired level, irrespective of the magnitudes of assumed Berkson and classical error, whether shared or unshared. However, the coverage probabilities for the quadratic coefficient [Formula: see text] are generally too low for the unadjusted and regression calibration methods, particularly for larger magnitudes of the Berkson error, whether this is shared or unshared. In contrast Monte Carlo maximum likelihood yields coverage probabilities for [Formula: see text] that are uniformly too high. The extended regression calibration method yields coverage probabilities that are too low when shared and unshared Berkson errors are both large, although otherwise it performs well, and coverage is generally better than these other three methods. A notable feature is that for all methods apart from extended regression calibration the estimates of the quadratic coefficient [Formula: see text] are substantially upwardly biased.
| S-EPMC10499875 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A novel calibration method based on polar coordinate is proposed. The world coordinates are expressed in the form of polar coordinates, which are converted to world coordinates in the calibration process. In the beginning, the calibration points are obtained in polar coordinates. By transformation between polar coordinates and rectangular coordinates, the points turn into form of rectangular coordinates. Then, the points are matched with the corresponding image coordinates. At last, the parameters are obtained by objective function optimization. By the proposed method, the relationships between objects and cameras are expressed in polar coordinates easily. It is suitable for multi-camera calibration. Cameras can be calibrated with fewer points. The calibration images can be positioned according to the location of cameras. The experiment results demonstrate that the proposed method is an efficient calibration method. By the method, cameras are calibrated conveniently with high accuracy.
| S-EPMC5087901 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Online calibration technique has been widely employed to calibrate new items due to its advantages. Method A is the simplest online calibration method and has attracted many attentions from researchers recently. However, a key assumption of Method A is that it treats person-parameter estimates θ^s (obtained by maximum likelihood estimation [MLE]) as their true values θs , thus the deviation of the estimated θ^s from their true values might yield inaccurate item calibration when the deviation is nonignorable. To improve the performance of Method A, a new method, MLE-LBCI-Method A, is proposed. This new method combines a modified Lord's bias-correction method (named as maximum likelihood estimation-Lord's bias-correction with iteration [MLE-LBCI]) with the original Method A in an effort to correct the deviation of θ^s which may adversely affect the item calibration precision. Two simulation studies were carried out to explore the performance of both MLE-LBCI and MLE-LBCI-Method A under several scenarios. Simulation results showed that MLE-LBCI could make a significant improvement over the ML ability estimates, and MLE-LBCI-Method A did outperform Method A in almost all experimental conditions.
| S-EPMC5978521 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In structure light measurement systems or 3D printing systems, the errors caused by optical distortion of a digital projector always affect the precision performance and cannot be ignored. Existing methods to calibrate the projection distortion rely on calibration plate and photogrammetry, so the calibration performance is largely affected by the quality of the plate and the imaging system. This paper proposes a new projector calibration approach that makes use of photodiodes to directly detect the light emitted from a digital projector. By analyzing the output sequence of the photoelectric module, the pixel coordinates can be accurately obtained by the curve fitting method. A polynomial distortion representation is employed to reduce the residuals of the traditional distortion representation model. Experimental results and performance evaluation show that the proposed calibration method is able to avoid most of the disadvantages in traditional methods and achieves a higher accuracy. This proposed method is also practically applicable to evaluate the geometric optical performance of other optical projection system.
| S-EPMC4634452 | biostudies-literature