Dataset Information

Balloon-occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO): Follow-Up and Postprocedural Imaging.

ABSTRACT: The majority of patients undergoing balloon retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) are decompensated cirrhotic for either bleeding gastric varices (GV) or hepatic encephalopathy. These patients will require close follow-up and assessments pre- and post-BRTO including clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging evaluations. It is essential that clinicians are aware of the potential benefits and complications that may result from BRTO. These complications may include fever, chest or epigastric pain, hemoglobinuria, transient hypertension, nausea or vomiting, and many more. These complications usually resolve within the first 10 days. Laboratory abnormalities are transient and uncommon. Radiologic and endoscopic follow-up are required including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), routine upper endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), which are detailed in this review. Patients undergoing BRTO are usually complicated and will require a team approach. This team should include the hepatologist, endoscopist, and interventional radiologist. Understanding and open dialogue are essential in the management of post-BRTO patients. The authors review the possible benefits, potential complications, and the evaluation tools needed to improve outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Sauer BG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3312166 | biostudies-other | 2011 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesGastric varices (GV) with spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) are associated with ectopic embolism in endoscopic cyanoacrylate. This study targeted to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for GV with high-risk ectopic embolism.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed six tertiary hospitals' 104 patients with GV at high-risk ectopic embolism (the narrowest diameter of SPSS was greater than or equal to 5 mm and the maximum diameter usually >8 mm) who underwent EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection or BRTO from January 2014 to December 2020. The outcomes included rebleeding, survival, and complications.ResultsThe EUS group and BRTO group contained 59 and 45 patients, respectively. The technical success rate between the two groups was similar (96.6% vs. 95.6%, P = 1.000). During the follow-up, both groups' 5-day rebleeding rate and 6-week mortality rate were 0%. One-year all-cause rebleeding rate (20.0% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.900) and 1-year mortality rate (2.0% vs. 0%, P = 1.000) in the EUS group were similar to the BRTO group. One patient experienced ectopic embolism in the EUS group, while the BRTO group did not. Both groups had similar mean days (16.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 12.0-19.0] vs. 16.5 [IQR, 11.8-26.0], P = 0.165) and cost of hospitalization (¥ 45950.6 [IQR, 39330.2-55768.2] vs. ¥ 51205.8 [IQR, 31628.8-74251.5], P = 0.680). Multivariate analysis showed that the narrowest diameter of the shunt (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.062-3.258; P = 0.03) and content of hemoglobin (OR = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.892-0.992; P = 0.025) were the prognostic factors for survival.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for GV with high-risk ectopic embolism are comparable to BRTO.

Dataset Information

Balloon-occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO): Follow-Up and Postprocedural Imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets