Dataset Information

Intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation secondary to angioid streaks.

ABSTRACT: AIMS: To assess the medium to long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to angioid streaks (AS). METHODS: A total of 12 eyes of nine patients treated with intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg in 0.05 ml) for CNV secondary to AS were retrospectively identified. Efficacy of treatment was determined by changes in best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography. Changes with respect to baseline BCVA were defined as improved or reduced with a gain or loss of more than 10 letters, respectively, or stable if remaining within 10 letters. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 21.75 months (range: 1-54), patients received mean 5.75 (range: 2-15) intravitreal ranibizumab injections per affected eye. BCVA improved in three eyes (25%), stabilised in eight eyes (66.67%), and deteriorated in one eye (8.33%). There was no significant change in central retinal thickness (CRT) over the follow-up period (P=0.1072). No drug-related systemic side effects were recorded. CONCLUSION: The long-term treatment of CNV secondary to AS with intravitreal ranibizumab showed a stabilisation in CRT and an improvement or stabilisation of BCVA. The absence of systemic side effects was reassuring. Further long-term prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

SUBMITTER: Shah M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3443824 | biostudies-other | 2012 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe EVEREST II trial showed that for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), intravitreal ranibizumab in combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy improves visual acuity relative to ranibizumab monotherapy. However, whether combination therapy is incrementally cost-effective relative to monotherapy during a lifetime is unclear.ObjectiveTo assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of combination therapy compared with ranibizumab monotherapy in patients with PCV.Design, setting, and participantsThis model-based, economic evaluation used 2018 unit cost data from a tertiary eye hospital in Singapore, first- and second-year outcomes and resource use data from a multicenter trial across various Asian countries (EVEREST II) to model a hypothetical cohort of patients with symptomatic PCV. Scenario analyses and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine uncertainty. Data were collected from October 2018 through April 2019 and analyzed from March through October 2019.InterventionsThis model used data from the EVEREST II trial, in which all participants were given 0.5 mg of intravitreal ranibizumab once every 4 weeks for the first 3 months. Subsequent administration occurred as needed. For participants receiving combination therapy, standard fluence (50 J/cm3) photodynamic therapy with 6-mg/m2 verteporfin was administered once during the first 3 months and thereafter as needed.Main outcomes and measuresIncremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for combination therapy relative to monotherapy for patients with PCV.ResultsIn this model based on a cohort of 1000 patients aged 68 years, a patient with PCV incurred a total cost in Singapore dollars (SGD) of 92 327 (US $67 399) with combination therapy and SGD 92 371 (US $67 431) with monotherapy during a lifetime horizon, generating a modest cost savings of SGD 44 (US $32) per patient undergoing combination therapy. Lifetime QALYs were estimated to be 7.87 for combination therapy and 7.85 for monotherapy, for an incremental gain of 0.02 QALYs. Combination therapy remained cost-saving or cost-effective in all lifetime scenarios modeled, but during shorter time horizons and at lower monotherapy costs, it may not be cost-effective.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found combination therapy to be a dominant (more effective and less costly) strategy, being similar in costs and slightly more effective than ranibizumab monotherapy during a lifetime horizon. However, decreasing the time horizon to less than 10 years and/or reductions in the cost of monotherapy may result in combination therapy no longer being cost-effective.

Dataset Information

Intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation secondary to angioid streaks.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure