Dataset Information

Are rehabilitation services for patients in UK eye clinics adequate? A survey of eye care professionals.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific services such as emotional and family support are currently available in the United Kingdom for people with visual impairment.A validated online survey was created and distributed to clinical staff in eye clinics (for example, ophthalmologists and optometrists) and rehabilitation staff (for example, social and rehabilitation workers) in the community, who worked with people with visual impairment. A total of 67 clinical and 42 rehabilitation staff completed the entire survey online.Only 67% of the respondents claimed their clinics provide emotional support and 44% of respondent's clinics provided family support. Clinical and rehabilitation staff have differences in opinion over what constitutes an essential service for a visually impaired patient. Rehabilitation staff considered emotional support and referral to social services as essential more often than clinical staff (P<0.05). There is some confusion over the type of personnel who provides each type of service, with some services showing substantial repetition.In the clinics sampled, there appears to be an underprovision of emotional support (attentive listening plus constructive suggestions) and family support (emotional support and advice for family members) for visually impaired patients in the United Kingdom. There also seems to be some discrepancy in services that eye care professionals feel are available and previous reports by visually impaired patients of the service they receive. There is a need to develop standardised pathways across the United Kingdom, to solve some of these issues.

SUBMITTER: Gillespie-Gallery H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3470053 | biostudies-other | 2012 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesBreast cancer survivors experience a wide spectrum of physical sequelae from cancer treatment. National and international guidelines recommend that rehabilitation is offered from the point of diagnosis. However, there is a lack of data on the translation of these recommendations into clinical care. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer survivors, rehabilitation professionals and breast surgeons on current rehabilitation services including preferences for care delivery, specific ways to promote early detection and timely management of upper body issues and attitudes towards self-managed surveillance and rehabilitation.DesignQualitative focus groups. Breast cancer survivors completed a questionnaire about rehabilitation services received and experience of upper body issues. These quantitative data were collected to provide context for the qualitative data and increase transferability. Transcripts were analysed using content analysis.SettingFive geographically distinct health authorities in British Columbia, Canada.ParticipantsEleven focus groups were conducted with 35 breast cancer survivors, 29 rehabilitation professionals and 5 breast surgeons.ResultsThree categories captured participants' concern and wish for improved care: (1) cut the cancer out and goodbye; (2) you have to look out for yourself and (3) in a perfect world. All breast cancer survivors reported chronic upper body issues (mean 4.5 unique issues). Breast cancer survivors expressed worry and uncertainty in their solo management of the rehabilitation. The current services were reported to not enable early detection and timely management. Suggestions included reorganising the timing of patient education and improving the quality of and access to rehabilitation services by elevating the knowledge among healthcare professionals and providing multimodal self-management resources.ConclusionsThe results revealed a gap between oncology guidelines and the current clinical reality. The rehabilitation services were reported in need of revamping to increase equity of care. Multiple upper body issues were reported by many breast cancer survivors.

Project description:ObjectiveTo comprehensively update and survey the current provision of recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services for adult critical care patients across the UK.DesignCross-sectional, self-administered, predominantly closed-question, electronic, online survey.SettingInstitutions providing adult critical care services identified from national databases.ParticipantsMultiprofessional critical care clinicians delivering services at each site.ResultsResponses from 176 UK hospital sites were included (176/242, 72.7%). Inpatient recovery and follow-up services were present at 127/176 (72.2%) sites, adopting multiple formats of delivery and primarily delivered by nurses (n=115/127, 90.6%). Outpatient services ran at 130 sites (73.9%), predominantly as outpatient clinics. Most services (n=108/130, 83.1%) were co-delivered by two or more healthcare professionals, typically nurse/intensive care unit (ICU) physician (n=29/130, 22.3%) or nurse/ICU physician/physiotherapist (n=19/130, 14.6%) teams. Clinical psychology was most frequently lacking from inpatient or outpatient services. Lack of funding was consistently the primary barrier to service provision, with other barriers including logistical and service prioritisation factors indicating that infrastructure and profile for services remain inadequate. Posthospital discharge physical rehabilitation programmes were relatively few (n=31/176, 17.6%), but peer support services were available in nearly half of responding institutions (n=85/176, 48.3%). The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in either increasing, decreasing or reformatting service provision. Future plans for long-term service transformation focus on expansion of current, and establishment of new, outpatient services.ConclusionOverall, these data demonstrate a proliferation of recovery, follow-up and rehabilitation services for critically ill adults in the past decade across the UK, although service gaps remain suggesting further work is required for guideline implementation. Findings can be used to enhance survivorship for critically ill adults, inform policymakers and commissioners, and provide comparative data and experiential insights for clinicians designing models of care in international healthcare jurisdictions.

Project description:Pregnancy-related complications and insufficiencies in antenatal care services are leading causes of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings. However, there has been an undue focus on achieving a minimum number of Antenatal Care (ANC) visits without adequate focus on the factors affecting ANC service utilization. This secondary data analysis from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21) was conducted to estimate the coverage of adequate quality ANC service and its determinants in India. The study sample included 176,877 women aged 15-49 years who had experienced a pregnancy in the last 5 years. The primary outcome variable was the utilization of ANC services by women during their last pregnancy assessed by the frequency of ANC visits and the quality of ANC services. Quality of ANC service utilisation was categorised as adequate quality, inadequate quality and ≥ 4 ANC visits and, inadequate quality and < 4 ANC visits. We performed multinomial logistic regression and reported relative risk ratio (RRR) along with 95% confidence intervals. We adjusted for sampling weight, clustering, and stratification in the sampling design. The median (IQR) number of ANC visits attended by a woman during her previous pregnancy was 4 (IQR 3-7). A majority (59.25%) of the women reported availing of ≥ 4 antenatal care (ANC) visits during their previous pregnancy while 6.12% of women reported availing no ANC visits in their last pregnancy. Women aged ≥ 30 years were significantly less likely (aRRR 0.73 95% CI 0.66, 0.80) to receive ANC services of inadequate quality, and < 4 ANC visits. Additionally, any exposure to mass media (aRRR 0.69 95% CI 0.66, 0.73), and having health insurance (aRRR 0.71 95% CI 0.68, 0.75) decreased their risk of receiving inadequate quality ANC services and < 4 ANC visits. Women belonging to the richest wealth quintile (aRRR 0.52 95% CI 0.47,0.58) and those with an intended pregnancy (aRRR 0.62 95% CI 0.58 ,0.66) were at significantly lower risk of utilizing inadequate quality ANC services and < 4 ANC visits. Although nearly 3 in 5 women in India utilized a minimum mandated ≥ 4 ANC visits during their last pregnancy, only one in five of those received adequate quality of ANC services indicating suboptimal content. However, only one in five women utilized the WHO-mandated ≥ 8 ANC visits for a positive pregnancy experience. Furthermore, 14.3% of the women received ANC services of inadequate quality despite attending ≥ 4 ANC visits in their previous pregnancy. Our study emphasized the importance of the quality of ANC services utilised irrespective of number of ANC visits availed. Efforts should be undertaken to enhance the utilization of antenatal care (ANC) services by implementing media initiatives that aim to raise awareness, particularly among women belonging to disadvantaged population groups.

Dataset Information

Are rehabilitation services for patients in UK eye clinics adequate? A survey of eye care professionals.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets