Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Characterization of the upper esophageal sphincter response during cough.

ABSTRACT: Vagal reflex initiated by esophageal stimulation and microaspiration can cause chronic cough in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). By raising intraabdominal pressure,cough can, in turn, predispose to GERD. The role of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES)in preventing esophagopharyngeal reflux during coughing is not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the UES response during coughing.We studied 20 healthy young (10 women; age, 27 ± 5 years) and 15 healthy elderly(nine women; age, 73 ± 4 years) subjects. Hard and soft cough-induced pressure changes in the UES, distal esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter, and stomach were determined simultaneously using high-resolution manometry and concurrent acoustic cough recordings.Resting UES pressure was significantly higher in the young compared with the elderly subjects (42 ± 14 mm Hg vs 24 ± 9 mm Hg; P < .001). Cough induced a UES contractile response in all subjects. Despite lower UES resting pressures in the elderly subjects, the maximum UES pressure during cough was similar between the young and the elderly subjects (hard cough, 230 ± 107 mm Hg vs 278 ± 125 mm Hg, respectively; soft cough, 156 ± 85 mm Hg vs 164 ± 119 mm Hg, respectively; P not significant for both). The UES pressure increase over baseline during cough was significantly higher than that in the esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter, and stomach for both groups ( P < .001).Cough induces a rise in UES pressure, and this response is preserved in elderly people. A cough-induced rise in UES pressure is significantly higher than that in the esophagus and stomach,thereby providing a barrier against retrograde entry of gastric contents into the pharynx.

SUBMITTER: Amaris M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3494474 | biostudies-other | 2012 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

The Upper Esophageal Sphincter Distensibility Index Measured Using Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Identifies Defective Barrier Function of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter.

Project description:Background/aimsThe mechanism via which supra-esophageal symptoms are generated is unclear. We assessed upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function in novel fashion using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography. We hypothesize that symptoms related to aspiration of esophageal contents may be associated with a more distensible UES.MethodsFLIP and reflux symptom index score data from patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for an esophageal complaint over a 10-month period were analyzed retrospectively. UES distensibility on FLIP was studied at 40-70 mL volumes with in-depth analysis at 50 and 60 mL. Symptoms were compared between patients with low, middle, and high UES-distensibility index (UES-DI). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine associations between the UES-DI and individual reflux symptom index symptom item scores.ResultsOne hundred and eleven subjects were included. Overall, the associations between UES-DI and symptoms that could be related to supra-esophageal aspiration were strongest at the 50 mL FLIP volume. Choking item score was highest in the high UES-DI group (2.8) vs 1.4 (P < 0.001) in the middle UES-DI and 1.1 (P = 0.004) in the low UES-DI groups. Similarly, the cough item score was highest in the high UES-DI group (2.7) vs 1.5 (P = 0.009) and 0.9 (P = 0.002) groups.ConclusionA higher UES-DI measures defective barrier function which could may be the main pathophysiology that generates supra-esophageal symptoms.

| S-EPMC9274470 | biostudies-literature

The Upper Esophageal Sphincter Assist Device Is Associated With Symptom Response in Reflux-Associated Laryngeal Symptoms.

Project description:Reflux-associated laryngeal symptoms (RALS) is the process in which chronic laryngeal symptoms are related to gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux.1 Impairment of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) reflexes may predispose to esophagopharyngeal reflux.1 The novel noninvasive nonpharmacologic UES assist device (UESAD) applies external cricoid pressure to augment intraluminal UES pressure by 20 to 30 mm Hg and reduce esophagopharyngeal reflux events.2 This study aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of the UESAD in a pragmatic clinical setting, and to identify factors associated with symptom response among patients with suspected RALS.

| S-EPMC6067982 | biostudies-literature

Response of the upper esophageal sphincter to esophageal distension is affected by posture, velocity, volume, and composition of the infusate.

Project description:Studies of the pressure response of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to simulated or spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux have shown conflicting results. These discrepancies could result from uncontrolled influence of variables such as posture, volume, and velocity of distension. We characterized in humans the effects of these variables on UES pressure response to esophageal distension.We studied 12 healthy volunteers (average, 27 ± 5 years old; 6 male) using concurrent esophageal infusion and high-resolution manometry to determine UES, lower esophageal sphincter, and intraesophageal pressure values. Reflux events were simulated by distal esophageal injections of room temperature air and water (5, 10, 20, and 50 mL) in individuals in 3 positions (upright, supine, and semisupine). Frequencies of various UES responses were compared using ?(2) analysis. Multinomial logistical regression analysis was used to identify factors that determine the UES response.UES contraction and relaxation were the overriding responses to esophageal water and air distension, respectively, in a volume-dependent fashion (P < .001). Water-induced UES contraction and air-induced UES relaxation were the predominant responses among individuals in supine and upright positions, respectively (P < .001). The prevalence of their respective predominant response significantly decreased in the opposite position. Proximal esophageal dp/dt significantly and independently differentiated the UES response to infusion with water or air.The UES response to esophageal distension is affected by combined effects of posture (spatial orientation of the esophagus), physical properties, and volume of refluxate, as well as the magnitude and rate of increase in intraesophageal pressure. The UES response to esophageal distension can be predicted using a model that incorporates these factors.

| S-EPMC3327135 | biostudies-literature

Botulinum Toxin Injection for the Treatment of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction.

Project description:Dysphagia associated with upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysfunction remarkably affects the quality of life of patients. UES injection of botulinum toxin is an effective treatment for dysphagia. In comparison with skeletal muscles of the limb and trunk, the UES is a special therapeutic target of botulinum toxin injection, owing to its several anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological features. This review focuses on (1) the anatomy and function of the UES and the pathophysiology of UES dysfunction in dysphagia and why the entire UES rather than the cricopharyngeal muscle before/during botulinum toxin injection should be examined and targeted; (2) the therapeutic mechanisms of botulinum toxin for UES dysfunction, including the choice of injection sites, dose, and volume; (3) the strengths and weaknesses of guiding techniques, including electromyography, ultrasound, computed tomography, and balloon catheter dilation for botulinum toxin injection of the UES.

| S-EPMC9147508 | biostudies-literature

Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) metrics on high-resolution manometry (HRM) differentiate achalasia subtypes.

Project description:The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) reflexively responds to bolus presence within the esophageal lumen, therefore UES metrics can vary in achalasia.Within consecutive patients undergoing esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), 302 patients (58.2±1.0 year, 57% F) with esophageal outflow obstruction were identified, and compared to 16 asymptomatic controls (27.7±0.7 year, 56% F). Esophageal outflow obstruction was segregated into achalasia subtypes 1, 2, and 3, and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO with intact peristalsis) using Chicago Classification v3.0. UES and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) metrics were compared between esophageal outflow obstruction and normal controls using univariate and multivariate analysis. Linear regression excluded multicollinearity of pressure metrics that demonstrated significant differences across individual subtype comparisons.LES integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) had utility in differentiating achalasia from controls (P<.0001), but no utility in segregating between subtypes (P=.27). In comparison to controls, patients collectively demonstrated univariate differences in UES mean basal pressure, relaxation time to nadir, recovery time, and residual pressure (UES-RP) (P?.049). UES-RP was highest in type 2 achalasia (P<.0001 compared to other subtypes and controls). In multivariate analysis, only UES-RP retained significance in comparison between each of the subgroups (P?.02 for each comparison). Intrabolus pressure was highest in type 3 achalasia; this demonstrated significant differences across some but not all subtype comparisons.Nadir UES-RP can differentiate achalasia subtypes within the esophageal outflow obstruction spectrum, with highest values in type 2 achalasia. This metric likely represents a surrogate marker for esophageal pressurization.

| S-EPMC5690813 | biostudies-literature

Effects of Aspiration Prevention Surgery on the Dynamics of the Pharynx and Upper Esophageal Sphincter.

Project description:ObjectiveOral intake after aspiration prevention surgery (APS) is influenced by postoperative pharyngeal pressure and the dynamics of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). We examined the effects of less invasive APS combined with UES relaxation techniques (laryngeal closure with cricopharyngeal myotomy [LC-CPM] and central-part laryngectomy [CPL]) on pharyngeal pressure and UES dynamics.Study designRetrospective, observational study.SettingSingle center.MethodsWe assessed the high-resolution pharyngeal manometric parameters of patients who underwent APS from 2018 to 2020. Then, we compared the effects of bilateral cricopharyngeal myotomy (combined with LC: LC-CPM group) and total cricoidectomy (CPL group) on both pharyngeal pressure and UES dynamics pre- and postoperatively.ResultsEighteen patients (median age, 68 years; 17 men [94%]) were enrolled. Primary diseases associated with severe aspiration were neuromuscular disorders in 13, stroke in 3, and others in 2 patients. Pharyngeal swallowing pressure did not significantly change before and after APS. UES resting pressure and UES relaxation duration were significantly reduced (P < .001) and prolonged (P < .001), respectively, after APS. Only the CPL group (8 patients: median 62 years, all men) showed an increase in the velopharyngeal closure integral after APS (P < .05). More prolonged UES relaxation duration was recognized postoperatively in the CPL group (P < .01) than in the LC-CPM group.ConclusionLess invasive APS minimally affects pharyngeal swallowing pressure, decreases UES resting pressure, and prolongs UES relaxation duration. CPL may be more effective for postoperative UES relaxation in patients with a short UES relaxation time.

| S-EPMC8543729 | biostudies-literature

Treatment for upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction in a patient with poststroke dysphagia: A case report.

Project description:RationaleBotulinum toxin injection is a widely used procedure for the treatment of the dysfunction of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Although the injection can be guided by ultrasound, electromyography, or computed tomography, such techniques cannot determine the exact extent of narrowed UES and ensure that the narrowed extent is fully covered by the treatment. This report describes a dual guiding technique with ultrasound and the balloon catheter in a patient with poststroke dysphagia to improve these weaknesses.Patient concernsThe patient was admitted to a rehabilitation hospital 2 weeks postcerebral infarction.DiagnosesClinical presentation of the patient included severe hemiplegia and dysphagia. The fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) revealed penetration/aspiration when swallowing 1 ml water and 1 ml yogurt and pooling in the postcricoid region.InterventionsBalloon catheter dilatation procedures and Botulinum toxin injection were performed. We used a dual guiding technique with ultrasound and the balloon catheter to determine the whole segment of UES dysfunction by locating the lowest level of the impaired UES opening and to reduce difficulty in differentiating UES from adjacent tissues during Botulinum toxin injection.OutcomesNo persistent progress was observed on the symptoms and volume of the balloon during dilatation. The patient showed quick responses after Botulinum toxin injection. The postinjection balloon catheter dilatation showed an increased maximum volume (preinjection, 5.5 ml vs. postinjection, 14 ml), and the patient was able to eat yogurt, congee, or semi-solid food 100-150 ml 4 weeks after the injection.LessonsThe dual guiding method holds several advantages, suggesting that it may be considered as a promising choice in dealing with UES dysfunction.

| S-EPMC6455981 | biostudies-literature

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Project description:BackgroundThe Reflux Band, an external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, reduces esophago-pharyngeal reflux events. This study aimed to assess device efficacy as an adjunct to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).MethodsThis two-phase prospective clinical trial enrolled adults with at least 8 weeks of laryngeal symptoms (sore throat, throat clearing, dysphonia) not using PPI therapy at two tertiary care centers over 26 months. Participants used double dose PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and the external UES compression device nightly along with PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 2. Questionnaire scores and salivary pepsin concentration were measured throughout the study. The primary endpoint of symptom response was defined as reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and/or > 50% reduction in RSI.ResultsThirty-one participants completed the study: 52% male, mean age 47.9 years (SD 14.0), and mean body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m2 (5.1). Primary endpoint was met in 11 (35%) participants after Phase 1 (PPI alone) and 17 (55%) after Phase 2 (Device + PPI). Compared to baseline, mean RSI score (24.1 (10.9)) decreased at end of Phase 1 (PPI alone) (21.9 (9.7); p = 0.06) and significantly decreased at end of Phase 2 (Device + PPI) (15.5 (10.3); p < 0.01). Compared to non-responders, responders to Device + PPI had a significantly lower BMI (p = 0.02) and higher salivary pepsin concentration (p = 0.01).ConclusionThis clinical trial highlights the potential efficacy of the external UES compression device (Reflux Band) as an adjunct to PPI for patients with LPR (ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03619811).

| S-EPMC8286644 | biostudies-literature

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Metrics across Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Dysphagia: A Pilot Study

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10488079 | biostudies-literature

Older Age Reduces Upper Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Body Responses to Simulated Slow and Ultraslow Reflux Events and Post-Reflux Residue.

Project description:BACKGROUND & AIMS:It is not clear how age affects airway protective mechanisms. We investigated the effects of aging on upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophageal body pressure responses to slow and ultraslow simulated reflux events and post-reflux residue. METHODS:We performed a prospective study of 11 elderly (74 ± 9 years old) and 11 young (28 ± 7 years old) healthy volunteers. Participants were placed in a supine position and evaluated by concurrent high-resolution impedance manometry and an esophageal infusion technique. Potential conditions of gastroesophageal reflux were simulated, via infusion of 0.1 N HCl and saline. UES and esophageal pressure responses were measured during the following: slow infusion (1 mL/s) for 60 seconds, 60 seconds of postinfusion dwell period, ultraslow infusion (0.05 mL/s) for 60 seconds, and 60 seconds of a postinfusion dwell period. All infusions were repeated 3 times. We used the UES high-pressure zone contractile integral (UES-CI) to determine responses of the UES. RESULTS:Young and elderly subjects each had a significant increase in the UES-CI during slow infusions and during entire passive dwell intervals compared with baseline (P < .01, both groups). Ultraslow infusions were associated with a significant increase in UES-CI in only the young group, in the late infusion period, and into the dwell interval (P < .01). During the slow infusions and their associated dwell periods, young subjects had a higher frequency of secondary peristalsis than elderly subjects (P < .05). There was more secondary peristalsis during active infusions than dwell intervals. Secondary peristalsis was scarce during ultraslow infusions in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:UES and esophageal body pressure responses to low-volume ultraslow reflux and associated post-reflux residue are reduced in elderly individuals. This deterioration could have negative effects on airway protection for people in this age group.

| S-EPMC6120791 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data