Use of neoadjuvant data to design adjuvant endocrine therapy trials for breast cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Goncalves R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3518447 | biostudies-other | 2012 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Publications
Use of neoadjuvant data to design adjuvant endocrine therapy trials for breast cancer.
Goncalves Rodrigo R Ma Cynthia C Luo Jingqin J Suman Vera V Ellis Matthew James MJ
Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 20120228 4
Mature outcomes from adjuvant endocrine therapy trials in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer have enabled comparisons with neoadjuvant clinical trials that have parallel randomizations of treatment in terms of the response of disseminated disease versus the local response within the breast. Imprecise end points, such as 'clinical response', have produced inconsistent results regarding the relationship between neoadjuvant and adjuvant endocrine therapy outcomes. However, the proliferation m ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND:In the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) and the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT), the 5-year rates of recurrence of breast cancer were significantly lower among premenopausal women who received the aromatase inhibitor exemestane plus ovarian suppression than among those who received tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression. The addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen did not result in significantly lower recurrence rates than those with tamoxifen alone. Here, we report the updated results from the two trials. METHODS:Premenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive 5 years of tamoxifen, tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, or exemestane plus ovarian suppression in SOFT and to receive tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression or exemestane plus ovarian suppression in TEXT. Randomization was stratified according to the receipt of chemotherapy. RESULTS:In SOFT, the 8-year disease-free survival rate was 78.9% with tamoxifen alone, 83.2% with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, and 85.9% with exemestane plus ovarian suppression (P=0.009 for tamoxifen alone vs. tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression). The 8-year rate of overall survival was 91.5% with tamoxifen alone, 93.3% with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, and 92.1% with exemestane plus ovarian suppression (P=0.01 for tamoxifen alone vs. tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression); among the women who remained premenopausal after chemotherapy, the rates were 85.1%, 89.4%, and 87.2%, respectively. Among the women with cancers that were negative for HER2 who received chemotherapy, the 8-year rate of distant recurrence with exemestane plus ovarian suppression was lower than the rate with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression (by 7.0 percentage points in SOFT and by 5.0 percentage points in TEXT). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 24.6% of the tamoxifen-alone group, 31.0% of the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group, and 32.3% of the exemestane-ovarian suppression group. CONCLUSIONS:Among premenopausal women with breast cancer, the addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen resulted in significantly higher 8-year rates of both disease-free and overall survival than tamoxifen alone. The use of exemestane plus ovarian suppression resulted in even higher rates of freedom from recurrence. The frequency of adverse events was higher in the two groups that received ovarian suppression than in the tamoxifen-alone group. (Funded by Pfizer and others; SOFT and TEXT ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00066690 and NCT00066703 , respectively.).
| S-EPMC6193457 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces the risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer in women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.Tamoxifen has been the standard therapy for decades, and this is still the case for pre-menopausal women.Ovarian suppression is of similar efficacy but currently there is no strong evidence for adding this to tamoxifen and the additional morbidity can be considerable. Results from two important trials addressing this issueare imminent. In post-menopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane)are superior to tamoxifen in preventing recurrence but only letrozole has been shown to improve survival. The main gain is against high-risk cancers, and tamoxifen gives very similar benefit for low-risk disease. Traditionally, treatment has been given for around 5 years, but many women remain at risk of relapse for 10 years or more.The AIs, and more recently tamoxifen, have been shown to reduce further the risk of late recurrence in women still in remission after 5 years of tamoxifen if given for a further 5 years. The comparative benefits of these two options and the selection of patients most likely to benefit from long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy are important topics for further research, as is the optimum duration of AI therapy started upfront.
| S-EPMC4053079 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy has been increasingly employed in clinical practice to improve surgical options for postmenopausal women with bulky hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recent studies indicate that tumour response in this setting may predict long-term outcome of patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy, which argues for its broader application in treating hormone receptor-positive disease. From the research perspective, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy provides a unique opportunity for studies of endocrine responsiveness and the development of novel therapeutic agents.
| S-EPMC2966629 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposePhysician treatment preferences for early stage, estrogen positive breast cancer (ER + BC) patients were evaluated during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US when neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was recommended to allow safe deferral of surgery.MethodsA validated electronic survey was administered May-June, 2020 to US medical oncologists (MO), radiation oncologists (RO), and surgeons (SO) involved in clinical trials organizations. Questions on NET use included practice patterns for locoregional management following NET.Results114 Physicians from 29 states completed the survey-42 (37%) MO, 14 (12%) RO, and 58 (51%) SO. Before COVID-19, most used NET 'rarely' (49/107, 46%) or 'sometimes' (36, 33%) for ER + BC. 46% would delay surgery 2 months without NET. The preferred NET regimen was tamoxifen for premenopausal and aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal women. 53% planned short term NET until surgery could proceed. Most recommended omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for one micrometastatic node after 1, 2, or 3 months of NET (1 month, N = 56/93, 60%; 2 months, N = 54/92, 59%; 3 months, N = 48/90, 53%). With longer duration of NET, omission of ALND decreased, regardless of years in practice, percent of practice in BC, practice type, participation in multidisciplinary tumor board, or number of regional COVID-19 cases.ConclusionMore physicians preferred NET for ER + BC during the pandemic, compared with pre-pandemic times. As the duration of NET extended, more providers favored ALND in low volume metastatic axillary disease. The Covid-19 pandemic affected practice of ER + BC; it remains to be seen how this may impact outcomes.
| S-EPMC7921279 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAdjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) significantly decreases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Notwithstanding the demonstrated efficacy of AET, 31-73% of breast cancer survivors do not persist with AET. The purpose of this study was to explore breast cancer survivors' experiences and perspectives of persisting with AET and to identify the psychosocial and healthcare system factors that influence AET persistence.MethodsInformed by interpretive descriptive methodology and relational autonomy theory, individual interviews were conducted with 22 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who had been prescribed AET. These participants also completed a demographic form and a survey that assessed their perceived risk of recurrence. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic and constant comparative analysis to iteratively compare data and develop conceptualizations of the relationships among data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data.ResultsThe personal, social, and structural factors found to influence AET persistence included AET side effects, perception of breast cancer recurrence risk, medication and necessity beliefs, social support, the patient-provider relationship, and the continuity and frequency of follow-up care. For most women, over time, the decision-making process around AET persistence became a balancing act between quality of life and quantity of life. The interplay between the personal, social, and structural factors was complex and the weight women placed on some factors over others influenced their AET persistence or non-persistence.ConclusionExpanding our understanding of the factors affecting breast cancer survivors' AET persistence from their perspective is the first step in developing efficacious, patient-centered interventions aimed at improving AET persistence. In order to improve AET persistence, enhanced symptom management is required, as well as the development of supportive care strategies that acknowledge the values and beliefs held by breast cancer survivors while reinforcing the benefits of AET, and addressing women's reasons for non-persistence. Improved continuity of health care and patient-healthcare provider communication across oncology and primary care settings is also required. The development and evaluation of supportive care strategies that address the challenges associated with AET experienced by breast cancer survivors hold the potential to increase both women's quality and quantity of life.
| S-EPMC6042363 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Importance:Although adjuvant endocrine therapy confers a survival benefit among females with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, the effectiveness of this treatment among males with HR-positive breast cancer has not been rigorously investigated. Objective:To investigate trends, patterns of use, and effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy among men with HR-positive breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants:This retrospective cohort study identified patients in the National Cancer Database with breast cancer who had received treatment from 2004 through 2014. Inclusion criteria for the primary study cohort were males at least 18 years old with nonmetastatic HR-positive invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery with or without adjuvant endocrine therapy. A cohort of female patients was also identified using the same inclusion criteria for comparative analyses by sex. Data analysis was conducted from October 1, 2017, to December 15, 2017. Exposures:Receipt of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures:Patterns of adjuvant endocrine therapy use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Association between adjuvant endocrine therapy use and overall survival was assessed using propensity score-weighted multivariable Cox regression models. Results:The primary study cohort comprised 10?173 men with HR-positive breast cancer (mean [interquartile range] age, 66 [57-75] years). The comparative cohort comprised 961?676 women with HR-positive breast cancer (mean [interquartile range] age, 62 [52-72] years). The median follow-up for the male cohort was 49.6 months (range, 0.1-142.5 months). Men presented more frequently than women with HR-positive disease (94.0% vs 84.3%, P?<?.001). However, eligible men were less likely than women to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (67.3% vs 79.0%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.63; P?<?.001). Treatment at academic facilities (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25; P?=?.02) and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.55-3.15; P?<?.001) or chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34; P?<?.001) were statistically significantly associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy use in men. A propensity score-weighted analysis indicated that relative to no use, adjuvant endocrine therapy use in men was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77; P?<?.001). Conclusions and Relevance:There is a sex disparate underuse of adjuvant endocrine therapy among men with HR-positive breast cancer despite the use of this treatment being associated with improved overall survival. Further research and interventions may be warranted to bridge gaps in care in this population.
| S-EPMC6233775 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesIn 2003 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) initiated the TEXT and SOFT randomized phase III trials to answer two questions concerning adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: 1-What is the role of aromatase inhibitors (AI) for women treated with ovarian function suppression (OFS)? 2-What is the role of OFS for women who remain premenopausal and are treated with tamoxifen?MethodsTEXT randomized patients to receive exemestane or tamoxifen with OFS. SOFT randomized patients to receive exemestane with OFS, tamoxifen with OFS, or tamoxifen alone. Treatment was for 5 years from randomization.ResultsTEXT and SOFT successfully met their enrollment goals in 2011. The 5738 enrolled women had lower-risk disease and lower observed disease-free survival (DFS) event rates than anticipated. Consequently, 7 and 13 additional years of follow-up for TEXT and SOFT, respectively, were required to reach the targeted DFS events (median follow-up about 10.5 and 15 years). To provide timely answers, protocol amendments in 2011 specified analyses based on chronological time and median follow-up. To assess the AI question, exemestane + OFS versus tamoxifen + OFS, a combined analysis of TEXT and SOFT became the primary analysis (n = 4717). The OFS question became the primary analysis from SOFT, assessing the unique comparison of tamoxifen + OFS versus tamoxifen alone (n = 2045). The first reports are anticipated in mid- and late-2014.ConclusionsWe present the original designs of TEXT and SOFT and adaptations to ensure timely answers to two questions concerning optimal adjuvant endocrine treatment for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Trial Registration TEXT: Clinicaltrials.govNCT00066703 SOFT: Clinicaltrials.govNCT00066690.
| S-EPMC3855346 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 trial demonstrated that neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) increased breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates for postmenopausal patients with clinical tumor stage 2-4c estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. We evaluated national trends in NET use in relation to the conduct of the Z1031 trial and the impact of NET on the rates of BCS.Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified all cT2-4c hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients age ?50 years from 2004 to 2012. The time intervals of pre-Z1031 (2004-2006), during Z1031 (2007-2009), and post-Z1031 (2010-2012) were examined, and adjusted analyses were performed using multivariable logistic regression.Of 77,272 patients, 2294 (3.0 %) received NET. Clinical T-stage distribution was 66,885 (86.6 %) for cT2, 7318 (9.5 %) for cT3, and 3069 (4.0 %) for cT4a-c. A small but statistically significant increase in NET use was noted, from 2.7 % pre-Z1031 to 3.2 % post-Z1031; the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for NET was 1.28 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.45; p < 0.001] for post-Z1031 versus pre-Z1031. NET use varied by clinical T stage, increasing from 1.8 % pre-Z1031 to 2.4 % post-Z1031 in cT2 patients (p < 0.001) and from 6.3 % pre-Z1031 to 7.4 % post-Z1031 in cT3 patients (p = 0.02). Patients receiving NET were more likely to undergo BCS compared with patients undergoing primary surgery (46.4 vs. 43.9 %; p = 0.02) with an adjusted OR of 1.60 (95 % CI 1.46-1.75; p < 0.001).NET use has increased slowly since the Z1031 trial; however, overall use remains low. NET significantly increased the rates of BCS in patients with HR-positive clinical T2-4c breast cancer. Clinicians should consider NET use for patients with HR-positive breast cancer interested in BCS.
| S-EPMC5437722 | biostudies-other
Project description:Nowadays, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is a clinically acceptable (and sometimes preferred) strategy in patients with operable estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Despite the overall effectiveness of endocrine therapy in breast cancer in all settings, de novo (primary) and acquired (secondary) endocrine therapy resistance remains a major clinical problem. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials for breast cancer are not only a great opportunity to determine which ER+ breast cancers can be treated without chemotherapy, but also a great strategy to develop insights into the biologic basis for the efficacy of estrogen-receptor-targeting agents, alone or in combination, in an effort to counteract resistance to endocrine therapy and discover actionable molecular targets that can be the focus of future drug discovery efforts and/or translational/clinical investigation in ER+ breast cancers.
| S-EPMC5524371 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. The latest world cancer statistics calculated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) revealed that 1,677,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2012 and 577,000 died. The TNM classification of malignant tumor (TNM) is the most commonly used staging system for breast cancer. Breast cancer is a group of very heterogeneous diseases. The molecular subtype of breast cancer carries important predictive and prognostic values, and thus has been incorporated in the basic initial process of breast cancer assessment/diagnosis. Molecular subtypes of breast cancers are divided into human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2 +), hormone receptor positive (estrogen or progesterone +), both positive, and triple negative breast cancer. By virtue of early detection via mammogram, the majority of breast cancers in developed parts of world are diagnosed in the early stage of the disease. Early stage breast cancers can be completely resected by surgery. Over time however, the disease may come back even after complete resection, which has prompted the development of an adjuvant therapy. Surgery followed by adjuvant treatment has been the gold standard for breast cancer treatment for a long time. More recently, neoadjuvant treatment has been recognized as an important strategy in biomarker and target evaluation. It is clinically indicated for patients with large tumor size, high nodal involvement, an inflammatory component, or for those wish to preserve remnant breast tissue. Here we review the most up to date conventional and developing treatments for different subtypes of early stage breast cancer.
| S-EPMC4224200 | biostudies-literature