Dataset Information

Systems-based content in medical morbidity and mortality conferences: a decade of change.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Following the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recommendations in 1999 to foster education in the systems-based practice (SBP) competency by examining adverse clinical events, institutions have modified the morbidity and mortality conference (MMC) to increase SBP-related discussion. We sought to examine the extent to which SBP-related content has increased in our department's MMCs compared with MMCs 10 years prior. METHOD: We qualitatively analyzed audio recordings of our MMCs during 2 academic years, 1999-2000 (n = 30) and 2010-2011 (n = 30). We categorized comments and questions from moderators and faculty as SBP or non-SBP and characterized conferences by whether adverse events were presented and which systems issues were discussed. RESULTS: Compared with MMCs in 1999-2000, present-day MMCs included a greater average percentage of SBP comments stated (69% versus 12%; P ≤ .001) and questions asked (13% versus 1%; P = .001) by the moderator, SBP comments stated (44% versus 4%; P ≤ .001) and questions asked (19% versus 1%; P ≤ .001) by faculty, and were more likely to present adverse events (87% versus 13%; P < .001). Interrater reliability for the distinction between SBP and non-SBP content was good (κ = 0.647). Most common categories of systems issues discussed in 2010-2011 were critical laboratory value processing and reporting, institutional policies, and hospital-based factors. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade, our MMC has transformed to include more discussion of SBP-related content and adverse events. The MMC can be used to educate residents in SBP and can also serve as a cornerstone for departmental quality and safety initiatives.

SUBMITTER: Gonzalo JD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3546572 | biostudies-other | 2012 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences provide a forum for discussing adverse events and systems-based practice (SBP) issues; however, few models for implementing multidisciplinary, systems-focused M&M conferences exist. OBJECTIVE: To implement a new systems-focused M&M conference and evaluate success in focusing on adverse events and systems issues in a nonpunitive, multidisciplinary manner. METHODS: We implemented a new M&M conference into our large university-based internal medicine residency program. Using content analysis, we qualitatively analyzed audio recordings of M&M conferences from the first year of implementation (2010-2011) to determine the frequency of adverse events (injury resulting from medical care), SBP discussion, and allocation of blame. Multidisciplinary attendance was evaluated by attendance logs. Surveys assessed change in interns' perceptions of M&M conferences before and after the conference series (measured by median Likert-scale response) and trainee/faculty attitudes regarding the goal of M&M conferences. RESULTS: There were 226 attendees (66 faculty, 160 residents/fellows) at 9 M&M conferences. Average attendance per conference was 71, with representation from 16 disciplines. All M&M conferences (100%) included adverse events, SBP discussion, and lacked explicit individual blame. Interns' perceptions improved, including their belief that the M&M conference's purpose is systems improvement (4.35 versus 4.71, P = .02) and complications are discussed without blame (3.81 versus 4.34, P = .01). After experiencing M&M conferences, trainees/faculty reported favorable ratings, including beliefs that the M&M conference is important for education (97%) and the purpose is systems improvement (95%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a new systems-focused M&M conference resulted in a conference series focusing on adverse events and associated system issues in a nonpunitive, multidisciplinary context.

Project description:BackgroundCOVID-19 rapidly spread around the world, putting health systems under unprecedented pressure and continuous adaptations. Well-established health information systems (HIS) are crucial in providing data to allow evidence-based policymaking and public health interventions in the pandemic response. This study aimed to compare morbidity information between two databases for COVID-19 management in Portugal and identify potential complementarities.MethodsThis is an observational study using records from both COVID-19 cases surveillance (National Epidemiological Surveillance System; SINAVE) and related deaths (National e-Death Certificates Information System; SICO) systems, which were matched on sex, age, municipality of residence and date of death. After the linkage, morbidity reported in SINAVE and identified in SICO, through the application of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indexes algorithms, were compared to evaluate agreement level.ResultsOverall, 2285 matched cases were analyzed, including 53.9% males with a median age of 84 years. According to the method of data reporting assessment, the presence of any morbidity ranged between 26.3% and 62.5%. The reporting of ten morbidities could be compared between the information reported in SINAVE and SICO databases. The proportion of simultaneous reporting in both databases ranged between 5.7% for diabetes and 0.0% for human immunodeficiency virus infection or coagulopathy. Minimal or no agreement was found when assessing the similarity of the morbidity reporting in both databases, with neoplasms showing the highest level of agreement (0.352, 95% IC: 0.277-0.428; p < 0.001).ConclusionDifferent information about reported morbidity could be found in two HIS used to monitor COVID-19 cases and related deaths, as data are independently collected. These results show that the interoperability of SICO and SINAVE databases would potentially improve available HIS and improve available information to decision-making and address COVID-19 pandemic management.

Dataset Information

Systems-based content in medical morbidity and mortality conferences: a decade of change.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets