Dataset Information

The effect of lung-size mismatch on mechanical ventilation tidal volumes after bilateral lung transplantation.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Mechanical ventilation tidal volumes are usually set according to an estimate of patient size in millilitres (ml) per kilogram (kg) body weight. We describe the relationship between donor-recipient lung-size mismatch and postoperative mechanical ventilation tidal volumes according to recipient- and donor-predicted body weights in a cohort of bilateral lung transplant patients. METHODS: A most-undersized (10 patients with lowest predicted total lung capacity [pTLC] ratio = pTLC-donor/pTLC-recipient), a most-oversized (10 patients with highest pTLC ratio) and best-matched subset (10 patients with predicted total lung capacity ratio closest to 1.0) were selected within a cohort of 70 patients. All tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation in the first 96 h after bilateral lung transplantation were recorded. Tidal volumes were expressed in ml and ml/kg-recipient-predicted body weights and ml/kg-donor-predicted body weights. RESULTS: Postoperative absolute tidal volumes (in ml) were comparable between subsets of patients with undersized, matched and oversized allografts (552 ± 103 vs 581 ± 107 vs 582 ± 104 ml), and tidal volumes in ml/kg-recipient-predicted body weights were also similar (8.8 ± 1.4 vs 9.3 ± 1.1 vs 9.8 ± 2.1). However, tidal volumes in ml/kg-donor-predicted body weights revealed significant differences between undersized, matched, and oversized subsets (11.4 ± 3.1 vs 9.4 ± 1.2 vs 8.1 ± 2.1, respectively; P < 0.05). Two patients developed primary graft dysfunction grade 3, both in the undersized subset. Four patients in the undersized group underwent tracheotomy (vs none in matched and one in oversized subset). CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation after bilateral lung transplantation, undersized allografts received relatively higher tidal volumes compared with oversized allografts when the tidal volumes were related to donor-predicted body weights.

SUBMITTER: Dezube R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3568811 | biostudies-other | 2013 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The effect of lung-size mismatch on mechanical ventilation tidal volumes after bilateral lung transplantation.

Dezube Rebecca R Arnaoutakis George J GJ Reed Robert M RM Bolukbas Servet S Shah Ashish S AS Orens Jonathan B JB Brower Roy G RG Eberlein Michael M

Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 20121212 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>Mechanical ventilation tidal volumes are usually set according to an estimate of patient size in millilitres (ml) per kilogram (kg) body weight. We describe the relationship between donor-recipient lung-size mismatch and postoperative mechanical ventilation tidal volumes according to recipient- and donor-predicted body weights in a cohort of bilateral lung transplant patients.<h4>Methods</h4>A most-undersized (10 patients with lowest predicted total lung capacity [pTLC] ratio ...[more]

PMID: 23243035

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Acute lung injury is a life threatening condition often requiring mechanical ventilation. Lung-protective ventilation with tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW, calculated on the basis of a patient's sex and height), is part of current recommended ventilation strategy. Hence, an exact height is necessary to provide optimal mechanical ventilation. However, it is a common practice to visually estimate the body height of mechanically ventilated patients and use these estimates as a reference size for ventilator settings. We aimed to determine if the common practice of estimating visual height to define tidal volume reduces the possibility of receiving lung-protective ventilation. METHODS:In this prospective observational study, 28 mechanically ventilated patients had their heights visually estimated by 20 nurses and 20 physicians. All medical professionals calculated the PBW and a corresponding tidal volume with 6 ml/kg/PBW on the basis of their visual estimation. The patients' true heights were measured and the true PBW with a corresponding tidal volume was calculated. Finally, estimates and measurements were compared. RESULTS:1033 estimations were undertaken by 153 medical professionals. The majority of the estimates were imprecise and resulting data comprised taller body heights, higher PBW and higher tidal volumes (all p?0.01). When estimates of patients´ heights are used as a reference for tidal-volume definition, patients are exposed to mean tidal volumes of 6.5 ± 0.4 ml/kg/PBW. 526 estimation-based tidal volumes (51.1%) did not provide lung-protective ventilation. Shorter subjects (<175cm) were a specific risk group with an increased risk of not receiving lung protective ventilation (OR 6.6; 95%CI 1.2-35.4; p = 0.02), while taller subjects had a smaller risk of being exposed to inadequately high tidal volumes (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.02-0.8; p = 0.02). Furthermore, we found an increased risk of overestimating if the assessor was a female (OR 1.74; 95%CI 1.14-2.65; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION:The common practice of visually estimating body height and using these estimates for ventilator settings is imprecise and potentially harmful because it reduces the chance of receiving lung-protective ventilation. Avoiding this practice increases the patient safety. Instead, height should be measured as a standard procedure.

Project description:Introduction: The ideal ventilation strategy for patients with massive brain damage requires better elucidation. We hypothesized that in the presence of massive brain injury, a ventilation strategy using low (6 mL/kg) tidal volume (VT) ventilation with open lung positive end-expiratory pressure set according to the minimal static elastance of the respiratory system (LVT/OLPEEP), attenuate the impact of massive brain damage on gas-exchange, respiratory mechanics, lung histology and whole genome alterations compared with high (12 mL/kg) VT and low PEEP ventilation (HVT/LPEEP). Methods: Twenty-eight adult male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) no brain damage (NBD) with LVT/OLPEEP; 2) NBD with HVT/LPEEP; 3) brain damage (BD) with LVT/OLPEEP; and 4) BD with HVT/LPEEP. All animals were mechanically ventilated for six hours. Brain damage was induced by an inflated balloon catheter into the epidural space. Hemodynamics was recorded and blood gas analysis was performed hourly. At the end of the experiment, respiratory system mechanics and lung histology were analysed. Whole genome analysis was performed using Affimetrix gene chips and confirmatory real-time PCR. Results: In NBD, both LVT/OLPEEP and HVT/LPEEP did not affect arterial blood gases, as well as whole genome expression changes and real-time PCR. In BD, LVT/OLPEEP, compared to HVT/LPEEP, reduced lung damage according to histology, genome analysis and real-time PCR with decreased interleukin (IL-6), cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC)-1 and angiopoietin-4 expressions. LVT/OLPEEP compared to HVT/LPEEP improved overall survival. Conclusions: In BD, LVT/OLPEEP minimizes lung morpho-functional changes and inflammation compared to HVT/LPEEP. LVT/OLPEEP might represent a suitable ventilatory strategy in massive brain damage. 24 Wistar rats - lung samples, 4 groups, 1. non-braindamaged/braindead high tidal volume ventilation, 2. non-braindamaged/braindead best PEEP ventilation, 3. Braindamaged/braindead high tidal volume ventilation, 4. Braindamaged/braindead best PEEP ventilation

Project description:BackgroundLung inhomogeneity plays a pivotal role in the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), particularly in the context of pre-existing lung injury. The mechanisms that underlie this interaction are poorly understood. We aimed to elucidate the regional transcriptomic response to mechanical ventilation (MV), with or without pre-existing lung injury, and link this to the regional lung volume response to MV.MethodsAdult female BALB/c mice were randomly assigned into one of four groups: Saline, MV, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or LPS/MV. Lung volumes (tidal volume, Vt; end-expiratory volume, EEV) were measured at baseline or after 2 h of ventilation using four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). Regional lung tissue samples corresponding to specific imaging regions were analysed for the transcriptome response by RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics analyses were conducted and the regional expression of dysregulated gene clusters was then correlated with the lung volume response.ResultsMV in the absence of pre-existing lung injury was associated with regional variations in tidal stretch. The addition of LPS also caused regional increases in EEV. We identified 345, 141 and 184 region-specific differentially expressed genes in response to MV, LPS and LPS/MV, respectively. Amongst these candidate genes, up-regulation of genes related to immune responses were positively correlated with increased regional tidal stretch in the MV group, while dysregulation of genes associated with endothelial barrier related pathways were associated with increased regional EEV and Vt when MV was combined with LPS. Further protein-protein interaction analysis led to the identification of two protein clusters representing the PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signalling hubs which may explain the interaction between MV and LPS exposure.ConclusionThe biological pathways associated with lung volume inhomogeneity during MV, and MV in the presence of pre-existing inflammation, differed. MV related tidal stretch induced up-regulation of immune response genes, while LPS combined with MV disrupted PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signalling.

Dataset Information

The effect of lung-size mismatch on mechanical ventilation tidal volumes after bilateral lung transplantation.

Publications

The effect of lung-size mismatch on mechanical ventilation tidal volumes after bilateral lung transplantation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets